She's well-prepared, but superficially-researched.
Luckily she shows up well on radar.
Posted on 10/13/2009 7:45:31 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for a political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer personally attacks opposing parties and disrespects the integrity of the judiciary, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer recklessly accuses a judge of violating the Judicial Code of Conduct with no supporting evidence beyond her dissatisfaction with the judge’s rulings, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law, that lawyer ceases to advance her cause or the ends of justice.
-snip-
Regrettably, the conduct of counsel Orly Taitz has crossed these lines, and Ms. Taitz must be sanctioned for her misconduct. After a full review of the sanctionable conduct, counsel’s conduct leading up to that conduct, and counsel’s response to the Court’s show cause order, the Court finds that a monetary penalty of $20,000.00 shall be imposed upon counsel Orly Taitz as punishment for her misconduct, as a deterrent to prevent future misconduct, and to protect the integrity of the Court. Payment shall be made to the United States, through the Middle District of Georgia Clerk’s Office, within thirty days of today’s Order. If counsel fails to pay the sanction due, the U.S. Attorney will be authorized to commence collection proceedings.
(Full Order at the link.)
Done
The appeal is the thing wherein we'll capture the conscience of the king!
When I see that screen name I think of Koo Koo clock or Cuckoo clock. ;-)
She's well-prepared, but superficially-researched.
Luckily she shows up well on radar.
I'm a monthly donor. I ignore the fund raising threads, but I pay to play. If 1/4 of the FReepers gave 1/2 of what I do, which isn't all that much either, there would be no fund raising threads. For which I would be eternally grateful. :)
I just saw your post under mine. How did you get on my bump?
I was just throwing out the PC terms of the day. African of course makes no sense and is out of nomenclature of 1943 census requirement of descriptor, which they wanted to standardize between the the states.
Post on.
I just clicked on an link to the "Begging Thread V" in post 994 or maybe 995, since they both go to the same thread
~~~~~~~~~~
From the diary of a Pre-School Teacher:
My five-year old students are learning to read. Yesterday one of them pointed at a picture in a zoo book and said, "Look at this! It's a frickin' elephant!"
I took a deep breath, then asked...."What did you call it?"
"It's a frickin' elephant! It says so on the picture!"
And so it does...
" A f r i c a n E l e p h a n t "
I understand it. I just don't agree with it, nor believe some bureaucrat with an MD, (who reportedly took mulitple trys to get her license) is qualified to state it authoritatively. She didn't say what the requirement that could be verified by the "birth record", other than birth in Hawaii, alone that would prove someone was an NBC. At minimum it would take records or knowledge of the parents' citizenship at the time of the birth and that is not even on the long form from 1961 in Hawaii. Birthplace is though, that would give a clue, but would require further documentation, such as naturalization papers from before the birth. If the COLB is correct in every respect, which I highly doubt, his father was still not a US citizen, ever, but that would need to be checked via Visa records, or just be stipulated by all parties that BHO Sr, the presumed father, was not a citizen or even permanent legal resident, at the time of BHO II's birth, or ever.
lol.
Good night.
funny
Good Night.
Yes - I believe that is when I signed up. One can tell the style and verbage of a previous (banned) poster and how they are drawn to the same threads.
LOL!! Thanks, I needed that.
Of course you’re not entitled to know and that answer is side stepping. You did not answer his question and it is a good one because if you don’t care it can only mean that you are an Obama supporter. You don’t care where he came from, what he has done, who he really is or how those facts might influence what he does in the future. Why you have that point of view - you are a lefty, a paid Obot or both - is your business and doesn’t change the bottom line. The bottom line is your disinterest puts you in the same camp with the people who are destroying America. You are not here to contribute anything worthwhile.
Rather, his case against Obama was premised on the argument that Obama might have been born overseas and that the New Jersey SoS hadn't conducted any independent verification of a Hawaiian birth. Nothing about his father's citizenship being a disqualifying factor in-and-of itself.
BS. Donofrio case had everything to do with Obama admitting he had a Kenyan citizenship at birth in October of 2008. His case was solely challenging Obama on his citizenship that he inherited from his Kenyan father.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.