Posted on 09/10/2009 9:42:35 PM PDT by moonpie57
I just talked to Orly:
She has 2 good news items that she is very busy with right now:
1. Judge Carter is giving her expedited discovery - immediately.
2. Judge Land will allow her to present before the court in GA. She is leaving now to fly to GA to appear before Judge Land at the Federal Building in Columbus, GA at 2:00 pm tomorrow (Friday, 9/11/09).
She would like as many military supporters to be there as possible. I called Carl Swensson (RiseUpForAmerica.com), and he will see what he can do. If you have any contacts there, please advise them.
(Excerpt) Read more at resistnet.com ...
Wrong. If there were challenges to McCain’s eligibilty in the courts ( if he had been elected ) then the Congressional Record could be entered as evidence. The CR has been entered as evidence in cases where they were arguing over Constitutional matters in the past.
That has yet to be decided. If Judge Carter grants discovery, as it appears he will, it will be just plain wrong.
If there was nothing to discover, Obama wouldn't have sealed all his records nor would he have an internet war room with paid and volunteer trolls.
So, you said you’re smart (smarter than her at any rate) and some sort of attorney.
Why don’t you offer to help her out, give her the benefit of your wisdom, native intelligence, and experience?
Or do you not want her to succeed?
Akin to criminal behavior.
You are not worth whatever they’re paying you to don kneepads for 0bama, even if you’re a volunteer. You’re so transparent it’s as though you’re not even there.
Not me. That's one of those "other birth records" I spoke of upthread.
It does show that not everything on an official "birth record" is necessarily true, and not subject to challenge, if the issue is important enough to bother doing so. This one is.
That document is no longer issued, but it was when Obama had to have been born, until the early '70s IIRC.
Can a congressional record be entered into evidence in a civil or criminal tribunal? You betcha. Which is exactly why so many people who testify in front Congressional sub-committees during a scandal demand, limited, full or use immunity. But, NON-binding resolutions carry NO weight in a courtroom - none whatsoever. They literally aren't worth the paper they're printed on, legally speaking - of course.
Contemptuous of the fact that 0bama most likely isn’t even eligible to be sitting where he’s sitting and is there an unconstitutional usurper, and every appointment/hire/law signed/monies earmarked etcetcetc is destroying this country faster than you can sing “happy birthday to me”?
No. You’re not contemptuous of that. You’re contemptuous of those who care about the above.
You’re sickening.
Yeah, 96 signed up to help his buddy NS as I was kicking NS's behind all over the place yesterday.
There certainly are enough lefties yelling “Shut-up”. If his ineligibility wasn’t the truth, this would be ignored. Because he is ineligible, they will try to demean, intimidate and marginalize the truth and those who speak it.
In my experience, not that rare. Attorney’s Donofrio and Berg are examples. Donofrio being one of the most prominant Dualer, and Berg being one of the most prominant Birther. Neither of them are both so far as I can tell (by their public statements). Both attorneys have large numbers of folks who agree with them on their positions. There are, of course others as well (ex. Attorney Apuzzo being another prominant dualer).
I did see the change in the law back in June and it was maddening!
It's gone on for so long now that Obama being ineligible is the most likely case.
Cyropaedia challenged that in post 692 stating: McCain also showed his BC to the members of Senate Judiciary committee and that fact was entered into the Congressional Record as evidence
And THAT is the point. McCain produced his long form BC.
Yup. I remember. And we all knew why.
And his trolls show up like clockwork spewing the same talking points.
Title of thread:
Cpt Connie Rhodes, MD refuses deployment to Iraq until Obamas legitimacy for CinC is verified
Your lie starts in post #67
“Obama has a document that is prima fascia evidence of his birth in HI. The evidentiary burden then falls to the plaintiff to prove that it's either fraudulent or invalid in some other way. That's a HUGE mountain to climb, probably insurmountable from a legal standpoint. “
Your next response in post #95
“Obama has a Certification of Live Birth, that at least two HI government officials have publicly stated is legitimate, including the Governor. I'm assuming that those HI officials would swear to that in an affidavit. If so, that Certification of Live Birth is prima fascia evidence of birth - it's settled US law.”
After I and other FReepers questioned your so-called facts, you responded with....
Post #108
“ I haven't seen anything. And, you shouldn't be so defensive when someone, in good faith, tries to explain the legal complexities of this matter, especially if those nuances don't cut your way.
The governor of HI has publicly stated that a properly kept BC is on file. Furthermore, the Director of Records in HI (or some such title) has said that Obama’s Certification of Live Birth is legitimate - you can google it, I'm sure you'll find it.
What I said is - if those things are both true, and the appropriate HI official would sign an affidavit affirming those facts"
_______________________________
You have had your facts wrong from the beginning. When many of us pointed out how you were wrong, instead of apologizing about spreading false info, you decided to whip out a Bill Clinton and lie and say you said “if” about your made up facts.
This is why I don't trust anything you say on this board.
You had no problem peacocking yourself out as an “expert”. You had no problem spreading false facts about this issue.
When cornered by FReepers who know more than you, you decided to lie and then run off to bed like a child.
___________________________________
Sorry for the long post everyone.
I am just so tired of know-it-alls on this board, who lie and spread their crap.
I post this so maybe people new to this subject will not fall for crap from fibbers.
Just because you don't like the facts, doesn't mean someone is lying. Sorry.
But, I will say it again -
Obama DOES have a document that is prima facie evidence of birth - recognized in EVERY courtroom in America. That just a fact.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.