Posted on 09/08/2009 2:15:45 PM PDT by pissant
A California judge today tentatively scheduled a trial for Jan. 26, 2010, for a case that challenges Barack Obama's eligibility to be president based on questions over his qualifications under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.
If the case actually goes to arguments before U.S. District Judge David Carter, it will be the first time the merits of the dispute have been argued in open court, according to one of the attorneys working on the issue.
In a highly anticipated hearing today before Carter, several motions were heard, including a resolution to long-standing questions about whether attorney Orly Taitz properly served notice on the defendants, which she had.
In a second ruling, Carter ordered that attorney Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation can be added to the case to represent defendants Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, who had been removed by an earlier court order. Drake, the vice presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, and Robinson, the party's chairman, were restored as plaintiffs.
But the judge did not immediately rule on Taitz' motion to be granted discovery – that is the right to see the president's still-concealed records. Nor did Carter rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case, submitted by the U.S. government, following discussion over Taitz' challenge to the work of a magistrate in the case.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Simple answer: He can’t produce the RIGHT document, pure and simple!!!
Yes, a ruling which will clarify this once and for all. This is a very serious issue which is related directly to national security.
On top of that he sent Sandy Burglar into the archives to stop up in his socks and pants with some damaging documents!!!
Remember his slip of the tongue when he told Stoopidlis about his muslim faith!!!
I think that maybe is her strong point. She is persistent like a pit-bull with lipstick and not intimidated by the judges. She has taken this issue further than any of her many male colleagues!!!
She alone has brought this issue further than any of her male colleagues. You could help her out with a $50 bill, I have!!!
I am very close to hit the abuse button!!!
This guy has one hand on the keyboard and the other hand some place else to produce an orgasm every time you are in a dialog with him!!!
ORLy post court session video
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2009/09/orly-taitz-debriefs-after-tuesday-court.html
What amazes me is that Jim Robinson seems to not cared that NS is such a deceicer/liar working to dissemble and deceive and foment anger at FR.
***Cheer up, things are improving. A few months ago, JimRob told me and LJ to stop hunting CoLB trolls. It looks like you’ve been given a free pass, so... happy hunting.
We got the mods to come full circle on Star Traveler, maybe they’ll see the light with NS.
COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum. (Trolling 101)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2165967/posts
the problem with your theory is that there on people who post here who have studied the law. And if you try to force people to dummy down, they resist.
DON’T TREAD ON ME.
here is a sample of periodicals:
# Kluwer Law International Journal Library (HeinOnline) [more information]
This HeinOnline Library contains 12 European periodicals published by Wolters Kluwer. Searching can be done by title or author name, as well as by full-text searching of the collection or select periodicals. Coverage is from v. 1, but HeinOnline must delay the release of new content by three complete volumes, per contract with the publisher.
# Kluwer Law International Journals [more information]
Also known as KLI Journals Online. Georgetown has electronic access to those Kluwer Law International Journals (KLI Journals Online) that we subscribe to in print and that are available on the web (KLI Journals Online). NOTE: The Library does not subscribe to all titles that are listed on the Kluwer web site. For a complete list of titles to which we subscribe, see http://gull.georgetown.edu/record=e100104.
# Legal Journals Index [more information]
The LJI Web database, which is part of the Current Legal Information service, comprises entries from both Legal Journals Index and European Legal Journals Index. These provide citations and brief abstracts to over 320 periodicals published in the UK (1986 - present) and Europe (1993 - present). Our link will take you to the main CLI page; choose LJI from the menu there.
# Legal Periodicals and Books (formerly ILP) [more information]
Database of article listings from nearly 1,000 English language legal periodicals & law books published from 1982 to the present. Publications include law reviews, bar association journals, university publications, yearbooks, & government publications. Can be searched together with Legal Periodicals & Books Retro database (1918 to 1981). Available in print in the Williams Library Reading Room and Wolff Library reference at call number KF8 .I4 (Index to Legal Periodicals and Books).
# Legal Periodicals and Books (ILP) Retrospective [more information]
Database of article listings from over 750 legal periodicals & law books published from 1918 to 1981 in the United States, Canada, Great Britain, Ireland, Australia and New Zealand. Publications include law reviews, bar association journals, university publications, yearbooks, & government publications. Content also includes annual surveys of the laws of a jurisdiction, annual surveys of the federal courts, yearbooks, annual institutes, and annual reviews of the work in a given field or on a given topic. Can be searched together with Legal Periodicals and Books database (1982 to present). Available in print in the Williams Library Reading Room and Wolff Library reference at call number KF8 .I4 (Index to Legal Periodicals and Books).
# Legal Scholarship Network [more information]
The goal of LSN is to facilitate the distribution of scholarly information related to law. LSN is part of the Social Science Research Network, a larger collection of working papers that includes scholarly materials from the fields of economics, finance, accounting, and marketing. LSN issues a series of electronic journals of abstracts — of working papers as well as articles accepted for publication — in various areas of law. These abstracts are distributed principally via email, over the Internet, along with weekly announcements. In addition, law school working papers are posted on the LSN website for downloading in Adobe Acrobat format. GULC faculty, staff and students can register to receive email from LSN by using this form.
# LegalTrac (formerly Legal Resource Index) [more information]
Provides cumulative indexing of approximately 875 legal publications. Also includes law related articles from more than 1,000 additional business and general interest periodicals. Coverage begins in 1980. Also available in print as the Current Law Index (Williams Reading
Absolutely. A rare moment of public honesty.
Appreciate the ping! As Representative Davis stated, states falsify BC documents all the time, when adoptions take place. Won’t it be interesting to find out what is in the HI vital records, since Lolo adopted Barry in HI and renamed him Barry Soetoro, as attested to by Stanley Ann’s pleading in her divorce from Lolo in 1980!
The problem with your post is that it doesn’t make any sense. Looks like there wasn’t much need to force you to dummy down.
Then I am relieved that I meet the requirements. Please notify the moderators, which seems to be your responsibility.
The baseball game is on. How's Obama doing?
You truly are clueless about the process. The opposing side has the right to respond to a motion to dismiss. The government had no expectation that their motion would be granted on Tuesday. And I'll also point out that the judge could have denied their motion on Tuesday, as he did with all three of Orly's, but he didn't do that either. If your quote is accurate and the judge said such motions seldom if ever are granted then why didn't he do that? If he was so contemptuous that he hadn't bothered to read it, as you seem to believe, why didn't he toss it along with Orly's frivolous motions? Especially if, as you believe, he wasn't going to give it any thought anyway?
How about we put it to a FR vote who is more clueless you or me? I vote YOU. 1 to zip!
(*yawn*) And I vote you. Tied.
And the Gooberment lawyers played games until Carter told them to except it not make silly excuses.
You haven't read any of the transcripts or the orders that have been printed or issued in this case, have you? Why not, they're all available out there? Instead you post from total ignorance, which is no doubt the state you feel most comfortable in. You really are clueless.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.