According to Larry Sinclair, he ain't that into hot chicks.
Posted on 09/08/2009 2:15:45 PM PDT by pissant
A California judge today tentatively scheduled a trial for Jan. 26, 2010, for a case that challenges Barack Obama's eligibility to be president based on questions over his qualifications under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.
If the case actually goes to arguments before U.S. District Judge David Carter, it will be the first time the merits of the dispute have been argued in open court, according to one of the attorneys working on the issue.
In a highly anticipated hearing today before Carter, several motions were heard, including a resolution to long-standing questions about whether attorney Orly Taitz properly served notice on the defendants, which she had.
In a second ruling, Carter ordered that attorney Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation can be added to the case to represent defendants Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, who had been removed by an earlier court order. Drake, the vice presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, and Robinson, the party's chairman, were restored as plaintiffs.
But the judge did not immediately rule on Taitz' motion to be granted discovery – that is the right to see the president's still-concealed records. Nor did Carter rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case, submitted by the U.S. government, following discussion over Taitz' challenge to the work of a magistrate in the case.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
I bet bammy is all wee wee’s up tonight. I imagine the First wookie is throwing crap around up there in the WH.
Are you related to HOLDONOW?
How long until the trolls show up on this thread?
This makes no sense.
1. Why would Kreep represent “defendants” from the AIP ?
2. How can he schedule a trial without going thru a discovery period ?
I’m looking forward to other info coming out.
“President Obama’s defenders also said they would file a motion seeking to block any discovery of evidence at this point.”
Oh really?
It’s called a typo
According to Larry Sinclair, he ain't that into hot chicks.
Happens to all of us.
Some hot chick could just offer to massage his feet.
______________
He would be far more interested in a hot guy, trust me on that one.
BC TROLL
My mother couldn’t afford to send me to the school where all the AMERICAN kids went.
Once an Indonesian, always an Indonesian? If he thought of himself as an AMERICAN, he would have said:
WHERE ALL THE OTHER AMERICAN KIDS WENT.
_________________
Good catch!!!
You signed up today, just to comment on this?
Dinner says it will never get that far. Motions, motions and more motions and then a 1,500 page Summary Judgment Motion with affidavits and brief. It will never see one day of trial.
That’s BS. That’s just his sob story and justifcation as the reason he went to a Muslim school. His stepfather was Muslim and he changed his name to Barry Soetoro and enrolled him in a Muslim school.
Nor did Carter rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case, submitted by the U.S. government , following discussion over Taitz’ challenge to the work of a magistrate in the case.
What business is it of the “U.S. Government”? This case is against Obama as an individual. Why should our tax money and resources be used to defend a possible criminal who has plenty of his own money to spend and numerous lawyers to defend his position? That STINKS!
+++++++++++++++
Right! This defense should be fully and completely, his legal defense fund, his warchest of overseas internet millions...
ping
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
Obama Says A Baby Is A Punishment
Obama: “If they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”
I want to know why in the f**k he went by the name of Barry Soetoro for several years but stated on documents that he never used any aliases or other names, when he clearly did. I wish Major Garrett would ask that ugly, skinny, gayfer POS that question.
and psssst. you are a troll on the BC threads.
I don't know about all the instances of where he had to swear to never having used another name or alias but in the case of his law license, I think the question meant had he ever been licensed under a different name.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.