Who is behind quashing the birth certificate issue?

In an explosive interview by Dr. Laurie Roth on her syndicated West Coast radio show on August 7th with Douglas Hagmann — a respected journalist, director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, and longtime private investigator, and Judi McLeod, a prolific journalist and the managing editor of Canada Free Press — the reason for the media blackout about the birth-certificate issue was nothing less than organized Mafia-like dire threats to members of the media issued not only from the heads of major TV and radio stations but also from Federal Communication Commission officials!

According to Hagmann and McLeod, who conducted a nine-month investigation and documented their findings scrupulously, after Obama was elected but before he was inaugurated:

A major TV talk-show host reported that he was ordered not to raise the birth certificate issue or risk losing his job.

FCC officials threatened to yank broadcasting licenses, break up conglomerates, and make the enactment of the Fairness Doctrine "look mild" in comparison to other consequences.

In at least one corporate TV headquarters, memos were circulated to all on-air employees not to mention the birth certificate issue, as well as other specific subjects like Obama's Illinois lawyer's license, his college records, etc., under both implied and explicit threats.

Thank you. I am worried for my family and my country. I think many peaceful citizens in the Democratic party have no idea of the objectives of those really in control. Most organizations are paralyzed by threats from both governmental and nongovernmental organizations. I've been critical of our conservative media, who won't take the ineligibility issue on. Now I think I see that should anyone public gain traction, the Obama central committee will have Acorn or SEIU goons, or plants in conservative groups create riots to that the justice department can do what they did to Scooter Libby or worse. These revolutionaries will use our open society to destroy us. Rush, Levine, Hannity, Beck,... are in the public eye, and thus can be held libel for incitement.

The need for secrecy will make it harder to organize, as will the coming control of our public media as well as the threat to our internet communications. I think most of us want constitutional guarantees. I think we are a significant majority. Fidel had under 2000 revolutionaries and established control which survives today. Venezuela is gone. Obama is consorting with Chavez to communize Honduras. There is much more going on than we can see to suppress our ability to respond, while destroying our economic system so that we are entirely dependent upon the government for simple survival.

I've heard, but will wait until there is confirmation, that Obama is securing our military, no longer observing its sworn allegiance to the Constitution. Fidel, Chavez, and the USSR are evidence that a corrupted military can silence even a popular majority. We must organize while we can. Unfortunately, our legislature has already sold us out. We probably cannot replace enough congressmen, even if our voting system wasn't hopelessly compromised, to stop this. 2010, given the variety of exigencies which could befall us, is probably too late.

While I am absolutely convinced of the rigor of the legal analysis - that Obama is patently not a a natural-born citizen. I also think this may be the only path to terminating his path of destruction. Again, that is thanks to the remarkable forsight of our founders. So whenever I see concerned people spending time on birth certificates or other documents which we will almost certainly never see, and which may not bear on the issue - Obama may have been born in the U.S. - I try to steer people to the deceptive truth: Obama said he was born a British subject and no one objected. Since we are presumably still a constitutional republic, it doesn't matter that no one objected, Obama is ineligible for the presidency of this republic. He, like Zalaya and Fidel and Ortega, will change the laws to imbue his dictatorship with a veneer of legitimacy. Obama may release a Hawaiian certificate, and the left will claim "See dummies!" We must communicate that a birth certificate is not important; Obama's British father is. Obama is "naturally ineligible". No law can endow a citizen with the quality of having been "natural-born". Obama's birth status made him ineligible.

There is cause to worry, we agree. And you’ve raised an important distinction.

The underlying question, though, is whether we are now in an era or environment where the reply to any of these issues is “so what?” Are we now under a regime where the cult of 0bama’s personality outweighs *any* Constitutional provisions? If that’s the case, we are truly hosed, because the historical precedents for concern are many and well founded. We’re just going to have to hold our collective breaths (not advocating passivity) to see if the populace ultimately ratifies this new (for the US) mechanism of governance. As I see it, it’s a race between the competing forces of the economic squeeze/collapse versus the cries for help from a traumatized population. Now it’s our side which finds ourselves in hopey changeland. I’m optimistic, but I don’t underestimate the cornered animal we face. It’s in effect a reminder of how good we have it to see how many fronts this enemy can find to attack and destroy.

If the cult of Obama outweighs constitutional provisions we lose the provisions, 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, which protect us. We lose the structure of our government including separation of powers. The inevitable law suits by former owners of GM, Chrysler, Lehman, and others will have no meaning; nor eventually will contract law. Personality rather than the constitution will guide our military, now sworn not to defend and obey the president and commander in chief, but to defend the constitution. Cap and trade will destroy our international competitiveness. Obama’s health-care will eliminate the costs associated with retired people. Obama has, according to state department records, initiated a massive influx of Muslims using a presidential directive to help Palestinians resettle in the U.S. Do we doubt that they, many if not most of whom are Hamas, Hizbollah, or sympathetic to them, that they will constitute part of Obama's internal militia? Without a constitution to protect us the change will be whatever Obama wants it to be. I don't think that will happen without a struggle.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.