Posted on 08/28/2009 8:21:55 PM PDT by rxsid
New Law suit filed in the Western District of Texas. Flight Surgeon Cpt Connie Rhodes, MD refuses to be deployed to Iraq until Obama’s legitimacy for the position of the Commander in Chief is verified Orly Taitz, Esq
Attorney & Counselor at Law
26302 La Paz ste 211
[snip]
(Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice
U.S.D.C. Western District of Texas
Submitted August 28, 2009)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Western district of Texas
CPT Connie Rhodes MD,
Plaintiff,
v.
Dr ROBERT GATES, UNITED
STATES SECRETARY OF DEFENSE,
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, de facto
PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES,
Defendants.
APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
Plaintiff Captain Dr. Connie Rhodes has received what appear to be facially valid orders mobilizing her to active duty with the United States Army in Iraq on September 5th, 2009 (Exhibit A). Captain Rhodes is both a US army officer and a medical doctor, a flight surgeon. On May 15th of this year 501 brigade out of Fort Campbell, KY, currently stationed in Iraq, has requested a support of medical personal in Iraq. Two days ago, August the 23rd, an order was given through the chain of command via e-mail for Captain Rhodes to arrive in San Antonio TX, Fort Sam Houston for Tactical Combat Medical Care Course (TCMC) to be held from August 30th till September 4t and next day, on September the 5th to arrive in Fort Benning in Columbus GA for immediate deployment to Iraq for a period of one year and twelve days from September 5th, 2009 until September 17th 2010. Captain Dr. Connie Rhodes wants to serve her country and fulfill her tour of duty, however as a US army officer and a medical doctor she has severe reservations regarding legitimacy of Barack Obama as the Commander in Chief and repercussions of her service under his orders, particularly in light of mounting evidence of him having allegiance to other Nations and citizenship of Kenya, Indonesia and Great Britain.
...
Continued: "http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=4038"
Srn married his third wife in Kenya. SADO grade point average was 1.3? for the fall semester when she turned eighteen. If Sr followed the same MO, he may have taken SADO to Kenya to marry before she turned eighteen (couldn’t marry in HI without parent consent until 18)...It would have explained her getting such low grades....(She possibly didn’t take final exams). No one saw SADO from that time till she reappeared in Seattle at her friends home with the baby.
Also we know from interviews with SR family, that SADO had a relationship with SRs family. They called her Annie Toot (That’s where the Toot came from for grandma Dunham). We know that they did not have a relationship after the baby was born, so it seems logical that she spent time with them between conception and birth.
AM still hunting for varification that BO said his mother was in Kenya 72 hours before he was born. Is it in either of his books?
Did the UK? Cause it's from their law's that Barry got his UK citizenship, not Kenya's.
It looks like a Polygamy marriage in the US would not be illegal if the polygamist (Sr. in this case) was an Alien visitor. Which he was, and therefore apparently didn't break any US law.
That's what I'm thinking is "most" likely re: the marriage.
My theory is they got on a “Slow boat to Kenya” maybe even working on a cruise line to pay for their passage.....Very romantic!
When they allegedly married, February of '61, She was already 18. She was born November 29, 1942, so she was not much under 18 when she got knocked up. BHO born Aug 4, '61. go back 38 weeks, (2 weeks after last period) you get to about November 11th. Could be as early as late October, or as late as about November 20. She would not have "been late" until about The first of December.
Could have made finals a bit trying. But she'd have been 18 by the time she suspected she was pregnant, unless Barry was a really late birth. Remember this was '60-'61, no EPT in those days, and even the tests at the doctor's office didn't work too early on.
OTOH, in those days, finals were often not until mid January, for schools on the semester system, which U. HI was. If she took them at all, finals would have been definitely challenging due to "other distractions". I suspect she did take them, and blew most of them, grades for last few weeks of the semester might not have been too great either. Or she might just have partied hearty all semester.
I suspect that is not true if the marriage takes place in the US. It's only that polygamous aliens may bring their wives to the US without being prosecuted.
But I don't know for certain about that.
But if true, it would be a good reason for BHO Sr to drag Stanley Ann off to Kenya or anywhere else, such as Indonesia, where Polygamy is legal.
It sounds as if that is probably what it was. Is there a "shorthand" term for that sort of board or hearing?
Thanks.
Hmm, since two separate "sovereigns" would be involved, how is that different from being tried in state and federal court for the same actions?
Married in Feb....traveling on a boat...Jan, mid-Dec? How long does it take a boat to get from HI to Kenya. Kenya was on the “Spice Route”, cloves. Could they have gotten a cabin on one of the “cargo ships”? Get married when they get to Kenya in February.....
Again, if Sr followed his pattern and since he did believe in polygamy, it seems most likely they were married in Kenya.
A divorce does not change the fact that there could have never been a legal contract for a US marriage. It was Void Ab Initio.
Remember, the marriage can be attacked collaterally even after parties are dead.
It is not clear as to whether Ann really knew before they were married that he was already married..or only found out later. The story goes that she did find out before the divorce.
I wouldn’t go so far as to presume why Ann filed those divorce papers. There is a person here who works in family law court that believes there never was a marriage. You don’t have to prove a marriage to file for divorce. She thinks Sr never knew Ann was claiming there was a marriage.
The divorce could have been for a marriage in Kenya. Which brings up a law later passed in the UK. The marriage would not be recognized for purposes of immigration if the marriage was before a certain date..1971 or 1972..and one of the people was domiciled in the UK or a country like the UK..such as the US. It is unclear how that would effect a child if he had already established UK citizenship. This would not be relevant if Jr was born in Kenya but would be relevant if born in US.
There is a picture of SR with Ann’s dad..I think in 1959. I suspect she knew he was married..I don’t think it is something he would have kept quiet during the course of conversations over those prior years with people such as her father....but maybe so.
He couldn’t legally marry third wife in US. I think he was headed back to Africa anyway.
The fact that he didn’t marry the third wife in the US...could show the mindset of why he wouldn’t marry the second wife in the US.
I really don’t think a Maui wedding took place. If there was a wedding, I think Kenya. So then why lie in the divorce papers? To make the divorce easier?
Jihad Abdul cannot come to the US and marry 20 US citizens and all of those marriages be considered legal for immigration purposes.
Jihand Abdul can bring his 20 wives that he married in another country where it was legal and they will be considered his wives.
IIRC the third wife “followed him to Kenya where they were married”.....When I read that line I wondered whether to take it literally or not.
I cannot remember the exact law off the top of my head..so I did search to see if I could find the right law and found this site.
Look at the comments. There is a great discussion of applicable laws.
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=4515
It seems we have a bit of disagreement between the barristers. See post 589 by jagusafr. :) Now, why am I not surprised. You guys are *worse* than engineers, and that takes some doing.
Certainly my memory could be off, but I recall that the proceedings were not particularly adversaral. It was about 1/2 day affair, maybe a bit less.
An onager-hueristic estimate:
It's over 9356 nautical miles from Honolulu to Mombasa, but that's the great circle route, which goes over the Russian-Chinese border, where a boat can't go. But being so close to the equater, the actual sea route might not be too much longer. So I'll use 10,000 nautical miles.
A freighter in such a trade would be doing well to make 15-20 knots, maybe as low as 10 knots. Thus it would take 500 hours at 20 knots, 666 hours at 15 knots, and 1000 hours at 10 knots. That's about 20.8 days, 27.8 days and 41.7 days respectively. So a month or so, maybe as much as 6-7 weeks.
BTW, an onager is an Asian wild ass, a heuristic estimate is a guess, so that make this a Wild Ass Guess, or WAG. :)
I've been waiting to use that for quite some time, although I have used it at least once before. I first read the term in an official report from a contractor to the USAF, and I had to go home to look it up, no desktop computer or Internet in those days, around 1974 or so.
Even Jihadis can only have four wives at any one time. No limit on the number of concubines thought. He could bring 16 of those, but they wouldn't be his wives either here or in Jihadistan.
Well, you claim expertise and so I thought I would try to salvage some of that by asking a couple of questions that are outside my expertise and seeing if I could get answers from you that were differentiable from opinions (as in giving citations, articles, etc.). Unfortunately I did not get any citations from you so I’m not sure that the answers you gave are very useful, at least to me. Thanks anyway.
How long would it take to go from Hawaii to Seattle by whatever would have been available if WND is right about newborns not being able to fly.
You could be describing an Admin Sep Board(for enlisted), or a Board of Inquiry(for commissioned officers). I didn't enter the JAG Corps until 1985, so they could have been called something different in the early '70s, but I don't believe they were.
Do you remember if the object of the your "panel" included the separation of the service member? If that's all that was at stake - no confinement, no reduction in grade, no forfeiture of pay, then you're definitely describing a Separation Board or a Board of Inquiry. They can certainly (and frequently will) be called based upon the conviction of a service member in a civilian court of law. If there's a criminal conviction in a civilian court, Admin Sep Boards are pretty straightforward. There's not much to argue, so it wouldn't appear adversarial, in the least - the service member was either convicted, or he wasn't. There's no "prosecutor" either. There's only the panel of officers, the service member, and his counsel, should he so elect (at his expense).
But, if your service member was facing additional charges that stemmed from a civilian conviction, Like an Article 86 spec, then at minimum, it was a summary court-martial.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.