Posted on 08/28/2009 8:21:55 PM PDT by rxsid
New Law suit filed in the Western District of Texas. Flight Surgeon Cpt Connie Rhodes, MD refuses to be deployed to Iraq until Obamas legitimacy for the position of the Commander in Chief is verified Orly Taitz, Esq
Attorney & Counselor at Law
26302 La Paz ste 211
[snip]
(Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice
U.S.D.C. Western District of Texas
Submitted August 28, 2009)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Western district of Texas
CPT Connie Rhodes MD,
Plaintiff,
v.
Dr ROBERT GATES, UNITED
STATES SECRETARY OF DEFENSE,
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, de facto
PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES,
Defendants.
APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
Plaintiff Captain Dr. Connie Rhodes has received what appear to be facially valid orders mobilizing her to active duty with the United States Army in Iraq on September 5th, 2009 (Exhibit A). Captain Rhodes is both a US army officer and a medical doctor, a flight surgeon. On May 15th of this year 501 brigade out of Fort Campbell, KY, currently stationed in Iraq, has requested a support of medical personal in Iraq. Two days ago, August the 23rd, an order was given through the chain of command via e-mail for Captain Rhodes to arrive in San Antonio TX, Fort Sam Houston for Tactical Combat Medical Care Course (TCMC) to be held from August 30th till September 4t and next day, on September the 5th to arrive in Fort Benning in Columbus GA for immediate deployment to Iraq for a period of one year and twelve days from September 5th, 2009 until September 17th 2010. Captain Dr. Connie Rhodes wants to serve her country and fulfill her tour of duty, however as a US army officer and a medical doctor she has severe reservations regarding legitimacy of Barack Obama as the Commander in Chief and repercussions of her service under his orders, particularly in light of mounting evidence of him having allegiance to other Nations and citizenship of Kenya, Indonesia and Great Britain.
...
Continued: "http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=4038"
Wind up a convicted felon? How so?
However, later discussion in the thread indicates that this isn't quite as "obvious" an outcome as one might think. Stay tuned.
(And I REALLY wish I could cut and paste from a PDF, all this retyping (in a house full of kids) is for the birds.)
Section 3, Paragraph (subsection) 1 reads as follows, emphasis mine: 3-(1) Any reference in subsection (2) or subsection (3) of this section to a colony, protectorate, or protected state shall, subject to subsection (7) of this section, be construed as a reference to a territory which is a colony, protectorate or protected state (within the meaning of the British Nationality Act 1948) on the appointed day, and, accordingly, shall not include a reference to Kenya or any part thereof.
The section you refer to does not include Kenya, but refers to all other UK territory but Kenya. So if you were born in, say, Northern Rhodesia, to British parents, but lived in Kenya on 12th December 1963, you kept your British citizenship. If you were born in Northern Rhodesia to Kenyan parents, and lived in Kenya on 12th December 1963, you lost your British Citizenship when you gained your Kenyan citizenship.
So did I. My third reserve CO (well IDT detachment commander) said I had the longest time in grade of any 1LT in the Air Force Reserve, when he announced my promotion to the detachment. Don't know if that was true, but with a 4 year break in active reserve status, and a year in the ANG, I had been a 1LT from June of '75 until 31 Oct '84, although I got some back pay and DOR adjustment to the time I was first eligible, rather than from when the promotion orders where issued.. IMy official DOR as a Captain was 20 Dec 83, . So I was a 1LT for about 8 1/2 years, but carried the rank for over 8 years.
Maybe she's a hermaphrodite? ;)
(ducks and runs away)
Ditto:
Godspeed, Orly Taitz.
May the spirits of our Founders give wings to your quest to disclose the truth of the usurper.
She hasn't "refused to go", although she is questioning the legitimacy of the orders. Given that the orders come via Constitutionally legitimate authority, she has no problem with going.
Technically I guess the difference is he was questioning the legality of the orders themselves, she's questioning the legitimacy of person who (ultimately) issued them. Not quite the same thing. However if she refuses to go, then she'd likely end up in the boat.
He was found guilty at trial of missing a movement, disobeying a lawful order, and going AWOL. She has done none of those things, yet. Questioning the legitimacy of orders is not the same as disobeying them.
Actually they frequently do restart negotiations, even with lessor changes than POTUS or SecDef, or cancel on going projects. They of course do not just nullify existing contracts, but they do abrogate contracts under general legal terms. "Convenience of the Government" being one such. Generally the contractor is reimbursed for money spent under the contract up until cancellation, but gets nothing for it's investment otherwise or its loss of future revenues.
And so it will continue because without the bc in hand, we can't get a judge to look into the case. What is it going to take to get Hussein to produce it for the court? I still say if they took the online COLB from his own website, videos of him saying Sr. was foreign born, a copy of "Dreams", and a copy of the constitutional POTUS requirements it would stand a better chance of being heard. There's no "conjecture and subjective belief" with those. At that time the court would have to determine if the COLB is a forgery and call for the long form.
Well if we manage to defeat ObamaCare, make a lot more money being a doctor in private practice. With ObamaCare, or is it now officially KennedyCare, she's in the same boat of the rest of us, that's up sh*t creek w/o a paddle.
Actually if they kick her out, as long as it's not with an other than honorable separation, she might be home free on her med school expenses. Or she can serve her obligated time and then go into private practice. Since they have no grounds for any military charges, assuming she reports for her training and then deploys, she can serve out her time as a Captain, and then become just Dr. Rhodes. Which ain't chopped liver.
Which is probably why she took it to civilian court. And why she'll likely obey the order to report and to deploy.
Well thanks for the info as she finally did serve them again.
A court-martial would be appropriate.
Via e-mail??? That's a legal order nowadays???
Yeah kinda wierd.....he wnt down an internet black hole 6 months ago.
Dr. Chiyome Fukino is a she.
Dr.Chiyome Fukino
Back in your day, they used a horse and rider for notification. Things have changed.
You keep telling me this but you've not given a link. I've searched and can't find your information.
Just get the professional version of Acrobat. Even if the PDF is an image, you can do character recognition, and save it as a text based PDF. If it already is text based, you can copy and past from a PDF even with the just the reader.
The character recognition is not perfect, so you have to check what you copy.
I did that sort of thing just last week for a monthly status report I was writing. Someone had generated the PDF by scanning in the document, so as to capture the signature(s). There's not really a need to do that either, you can just capture the signature page as an image, and then replace the text based page with that. (you could do the CR thing on that page, but I would not advise it).
All are in my prayers, every night.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.