Posted on 07/28/2009 7:34:23 PM PDT by pissant
Images of two 1961 Hawaii birth certificates similar to the one President Obama purportedly has on file have now been unveiled.
The Honolulu Advertiser published photostats of the original long-form birth certificates of twin daughters born to Eleanor Nordyke at Kapi'olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital Aug. 5, 1961, one day after Obama was supposedly born at the same facility.
The Nordykes' certificates include information missing from the short-form document for Obama published online, including the name of the hospital, the name of the attending physician, name and address of the parents, the race of the parents and the race of the baby.
As WND reported yesterday, Hawaii's director of health responded to the growing controversy over the White House's refusal to release Obama's original long-form birth certificate by issuing a statement about the document in apparent contravention of Hawaiian law.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Maybe Judge Carter and Lou Dobbs will be the patriots to stand up to Hussein Stalin and his thugs.
look at Obama’s COLB> Incredibly sparse. Almost no info on it at all. LOL! What a cheezy fake!
Whoa! This needs to be ping’ed to everyone. Good FIND!
Name |
Location of Birth |
Birth Cert # |
Date/Time Born |
Barack Hussein Obama II |
Kapiolani Medical Center |
151-61-10641 |
Aug. 4, 1961 7:24 pm |
Susan Elizabeth Nordyke |
Kapiolani Medical Center |
151-61-10637 |
Aug. 5, 1961 2:12 pm |
Gretchen Carter Nordyke |
Kapiolani Medical Center |
151-61-10638 |
Aug. 5, 1961 2:17 pm |
I wish they would replace O’Reilly with Dobbs.
I posted this last fall, and also on another thread about 30 minutes ago. I am posting it once more for you and any other FReeper who hasn't seen it, hoping it might be some sort of "CLUE".
-------------------------
Last fall when this subject came up on FR, I noticed something on the "alleged REAL Obamassiah BC. It is circled in red on the pic below:
Not being an expert at Photoshop (like whoever TRIED to sell the above as a REAL doc) I had my wife do the red circle on the above doc, and then enlarge the area, and came up with this:
..which appeared like a date stamped on the back that "bled through". By "flipping" the image, enlarging and darkening it somewhat, it revealed this:
I never did find out from any Freeper if it was a "clue" of any kind concerning the "Obamassiah BC Mystery".
I wonder if the date would help at all as far as finding out who filed for the doc, or who did the "transaction" at work that day?
Also, cronologically, what was happening with Obamassiah at that time?
NO NO NO
BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK because daddy was a lying bigamist
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-2071.ZO.html
WHOOPS!
Methinks someone faked BHO’s document, and forgot to check for sequential integrity.
Satin Doll posted on another thread that she read earlier that Obama’s newspaper announcement was actually spliced over the Nordyke’s announcement.
Anyone else recall reading that?
Also, I pointed out earlier that perhaps it was the Nordyke TRIPLETS, not twins, the third one died, and Obama bought the registry # and the place in the announcement from them for big bucks, no doubt.
Okay...question. Seeing the paperwork side by side...
The President was born on August 4, 1961...right? And his BC number is 151-1961-010641...YET...
Susan Elizabeth Nordyke, born Augst 5, 1961 (one day later) her BC number is 151-1961-10637. AN EARLIER NUMBER???
Any logical explanation how THAT occurred??? Because I would guess that Birth Certificate registration occurs in the order in which you were born, ie., August 4 births would have a lesser number than August 5...and so on.
I could be wrong...those wacky Hawaiians!!!
Again, see Hawaii's law about foreign births in post #13. Because they have no records on foreign births, all they can allow are assumptions. It's just simple, basic, assumed information.
These foreign certificates in no way claim the recipient to be a legal American born citizen.
there is a poster here that recently made a post about how things were stamped and I didn’t save the guy’s name. He talked to the people there about his own COLB
there were three ways that things were stamped depending on which stamping machine they used, etc.
I don’t remember the details. This may have been due to that.
I wish I could remember the thread that was on.
“Jun 6 2007” would be an alteration, hence it invalidates the “certificate”.
I think you are the first person who has foun dthis foreign birth info requirement. Great find that should be pinged.
Looks like the info is best guess.
No one seems to be seeing the connection. It's so easy, even a cave man can see it.
Thanks for your reply to my post!
I wonder if this is why his birth number is later than Nordykes's.
And what's a probable country of birth-can you make one up?
The first certificate looks like a MODERN ‘consular’ form of the BC, issued by an embassy (I know, my son’s looks like that because he was born in the UK and we applied for this abroad.) I repeat.....MODERN.
The second looks like MY original BC from when I was born in 1966 from MY state in the great US of A.
This is just all too weird beyond words.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.