Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Obama COVER-UP continues - but his defenders are getting very nervous
America's Independent Party ^ | July 22, 2009 | Tom Hoefling, AIP Chairman

Posted on 07/22/2009 1:52:14 PM PDT by EternalVigilance

For many months, AIP affiliates all across the nation have been pursuing the truth about whether or not Barack Obama is constitutionally qualified to be President of the United States. In addition to several key court challenges filed by leaders in the party, our people - regular constitution-loving, freedom-loving, patriotic citizens - have persistently kept this critically-important story alive. They are proving the practicality and viability of our goal of 'becoming the media.'

To date, the American people have been deprived by the Obama faction of every key document that could settle this supremely important controversy once and for all. Instead of simply expending the ten dollars it would take to release Mr. Obama's long-form birth certificate, huge sums of money have instead been spent on multiple attorneys tasked with extending the cover-up.

In addition to his real birth certificate, one that shows where he was born, who the attending physician was, etc., other documents which are needed to get at the whole story also remain under strict embargo: his college records, his student financial aid applications and documentation, and his passport records, to name a few.

For the most part, the question of Obama's natural-born status has been met with silence from the dying dinosaur liberal media establishment. When mentioned at all, it is with the sort of scorn and derision you would expect from any other group of Democratic Party apparatchiks.

Similarly, elected officials in the Democrat AND the Republican Party have met the millions of inquiries from the people they work for with either silence or obfuscation. The reply form letters sent back, even from GOP officials, to the mountain of requests for the redress of this grievance have all pretty much read the same: a pathetic repetition of the Obama faction's lying, long-ago-discredited, talking points. No surprise, I suppose, considering the fact that not one of these people raised a single question when they verified the Electoral College vote, even though everyone was aware there was a major problem with this man's qualifications, and that there was no credible proof on the table that Barack Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States of America, as the Constitution unequivocally requires to be President, or even a citizen at all.

But still, this story will not die. The facts of the case are so simple and straightforward, the constitutional requirement so clear, thinking Americans just cannot be ridiculed into silence by the craven hacks in politics or the media.

The burden of proof that Barack Obama is qualified for office remains on Barack Obama. If those who are supposed to represent you will not demand that proof, it is up to you to do so, loudly and persistently.

In recent days, suddenly, the Left and their minions in the press corps are on the counter-attack. The internet is crawling with disinformation and vile personal attacks by the Obama crowd on those who simply want our Constitution to be followed.

Now is the time for courage and determination to get at the truth. If you love our Constitution, you must speak up loudly and boldly like never before. Don't wait for someone else to speak for you. Speak for yourself. Act like an American.

The flak may be getting heavy, but that can only mean one thing: we must be approaching the target.

tom@aipnews.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial
KEYWORDS: aip; article2section1; barackobama; bho2009; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; coverup; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-163 next last
To: JRochelle

Is being a Liberal like being high?


141 posted on 07/22/2009 5:35:26 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ("It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: bluescape
If she saw it, and there’s nothing un-kosher about it, why can’t the rest of us see it.

Hawaii’s director of the department of public health, Chiyome Fukino has only stated that she's seen Barack Obama's birth certificate, and can attest that it's real.

She never even said that it's a US birth certificate. She said nothing, except that she's seen it.

The press and the left continue to dub in that she's verified his Natural Born Citizen status, which she never did.

She never said a word about what's on the document she saw.

142 posted on 07/22/2009 5:44:32 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
I have sent for my birth certificate in another state. I didn't get a long form, just a less than one page document, with a raised stamp. Do you have a link as to the difference in the two? Not some birther site, a real link.

Really, JR. Were you out of the solar system when all of the multitudinous evidence and facts surrounding this issue were being pored over on this site, just months ago?

There are probably thousands of links to government websites, case law, constitutional issues, historical documents, and much, much more, on Free Republic. All you've got to do is go read them.

Honestly, you've really got to catch up, if you want to make sense of this discussion.

Again, go here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/birthcertificate/index

143 posted on 07/22/2009 5:52:16 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Madistan

You see, liberals feel no shame about violations of the Constitution because, as they will repeatedly remind you, the document is “old and outdated” and doesn’t apply to our modern era. They just don’t see what the “big deal” is. It’s just like their take on God or on the sanctity of holy matrimony. They consider all these to be nothing more than quaint, outmoded notions from a faraway, ignorant time.


144 posted on 07/22/2009 8:47:16 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
I am telling you that there is not a shred of evidence that he was not born in Hawaii.

You logic is backwards.. of course there no evidence of where he was not born... they want a simple piece on paper that would be on file with the state showing were he was born...

One of these (see photo below)

I have one and I can get a photo copy for a few bucks an a stamp.

I bet you have one too

Obama said he has one...OK... can we see it... this vault copy oy his bc... Like I said he can get a photo copy for a few bucks an a stamp...

So what hard to understand?... what the deal?... it so simple to provide?... What the issue?... why the stonewalling? ...

He can end this farce in a second just providing one of these... but he hasn't... either way this is just getting stupid


145 posted on 07/23/2009 3:31:01 AM PDT by tophat9000 (Obama plans to fix America like he fixed his dog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: chris haney

Its not just His Birth Certificate He is spending Big money to Prevent Release of ANY of his Records. Financial applications to College,Medical Records ,Selective Service Records ETC.


146 posted on 07/23/2009 3:50:05 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: caver
That’s because liberals don’t believe in laws unless they are on the other side, then groups like the ACLU go off.

Running off topic, when music video networks first started, the Nashville Network had an advertising campaign that said, "Stand up for your country." MTV had one that had a teenager shouting "I want my MTV."

We're talking about a mindset. A liberal wants what they want when they want it. The law is what they want it to be when they want it to be that way. If a law is against them they ignore it. If it works for them, they use it. If it doesn't exist, they manufacture it.

147 posted on 07/23/2009 4:09:57 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

“We’re talking about a mindset. A liberal wants what they want when they want it. The law is what they want it to be when they want it to be that way. If a law is against them they ignore it. If it works for them, they use it. If it doesn’t exist, they manufacture it.”

I have a coworker like that. He’s a big time liberal that sees everything in shades of gray. He sees no absolutes and can make any situation the way he wants it. He got a speeding ticket a while back and argued with the cop that he should be able to speed because he was a better driver than anyone else. I couldn’t even grasp his logic.


148 posted on 07/23/2009 4:42:34 AM PDT by caver (Obama's first goals: allow more killing of innocents and allow the killers of innocents to go free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: frog in a pot

Who bought his books and made them a best seller when he was a nobody? Why was his autobigraphy important before he’d even done anything?

Was his speech at the 2004 campaign such a groundbreaking event or was it the introduction of the myth of OBAMA1.0? He was campaiging for the White House from that moment on.


149 posted on 07/23/2009 8:31:29 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Perhaps the truth will come out through exposing the cover-up of inadequate vetting, once their veil of smoke and mirrors is pierced.

“Truth emerges more readily from error than from confusion.”-Francis Bacon


150 posted on 07/23/2009 8:45:48 AM PDT by Canedawg (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg

Perhaps.


151 posted on 07/23/2009 8:51:49 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (The Obama COVER-UP continues...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise; COUNTrecount

“Who bought his books and made them a best seller when he was a nobody? Why was his autobiography important before he’d even done anything?
Was his speech at the 2004 campaign such a groundbreaking event or was it the introduction of the myth of OBAMA1.0?”

Your questions lead to the core question:
“Who serves as the core team of O’s mentors and planners - aka his handlers?

As you say, O’s self-serving books could be considered an out-of-context project for a relative unknown. They were almost certainly a setting of the table, a preparing the battlefield type of effort. Of course, the planning by O’s presidential team – in whatever group or form they were then in - started far in advance of the first publication date.

The professionals would back into the typical publication schedule for the publishing house of the first book and arrive at a date upon which the writing likely began in earnest. They would then examine the circumstances and characters in his life and continue back to a point of a likely beginning for a recognizable team. (We should assume the professionals already have such a matrix largely constructed with near contemporaneous information.)

It will be a long trail of characters populated with the likes of Bill Ayers, a violent anti-American as far back as the1960’s. We know it includes many socialists, communists, and assorted sympathizers some of whom inhabit Chicago, the birthplace of the Communist Party of the U.S. and likely includes some from other nations.

Here is an excerpt from COUNTrecount’ s July 11, 2008 #34 post:
“During Obama’s campaign for the 2008 presidential election, he portrayed his mother as a conservative girl from Kansas; however in reality she was a radical leftist and cultural Marxist. She lived in the Seattle area; spending her teenage years in Seattle coffee shops with other young radical leftist. Obama claims his mother’s family were conservative Methodists or Baptists from Kansas. However his mother’s parents were members of a left-wing Unitarian church near Seattle. The church located in Bellevue, Washington was nicknamed ‘the little red church,’ because of its communist leanings.
“The school Ann attended, Mercer Island High School, was a hotbed of pro-Marxist radical teachers. John Stenhouse, board member, told the House Un-American Activities Subcommittee that he had been a member of the Communist Party USA and this school has a number of Marxists on its staff. Two teachers at this school, Val Foubert and Jim Wichterman, both Frankfurt School style Marxists, taught a critical theory curriculum to students which included; rejection of societal norms, attacks on Christianity, the traditional family, and assigned readings by Karl Marx. The hallway between Foubert’s and Wichterman classrooms was some times called ‘anarchy ally.’”

Somewhere in my posts I linked to evidence that David Axelrod’s mother played a significant role with the U.S. version of Pravda and that he himself has a history of association with questionable individuals (excuse me, I really don’t have the link handy, if one Googles Axelrod it will pop up).

Finally, please indulge me with this shameless but passionate bump:
:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2296931/posts


152 posted on 07/23/2009 11:13:55 AM PDT by frog in a pot (It's a myth, folks. The frog will jump out and he will be pi$$ed. Ever had big warts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
President Obama, show YOUR damn long form COB, YOUR college transcripts, YOUR student aide applications, YOUR passports and explain why you changed YOUR name to Barack Obama AFTER YOUR visit to Pakistan. Until then DO NOT insult YOUR fellow citizens who have the right to know.
153 posted on 10/03/2009 7:53:05 AM PDT by Chgogal (American Mugabe, get your arse out of my bank, my car, my doctor's office & my elec. utility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; pissant; Ben Mugged; lula; screaminsunshine

The Case Against BO

Would you spend $10 for a birth certificate or
would you spend over $1 mil NOT to show it.

The first thing O did was to enact executive orders sealing all personal records to prevent disclosure....WHY? WHY?? WHY???

"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5qdaJcgHGw&feature=player_embedded">

154 posted on 10/03/2009 10:42:20 AM PDT by Colonial Warrior (Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from the rear, or a fool from any direction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colonial Warrior
"Would you spend $10 for a birth certificate or "

He did spend the $10 and show it.

"would you spend over $1 mil NOT to show it."

The money has been spent paying lawyers to file responses to lawsuits. If someone sues you, that's what you have to do.

"The first thing O did was to enact executive orders sealing all personal records to prevent disclosure....WHY? WHY?? WHY???"

Birther myth. The order had nothing to do with his personal records.

155 posted on 10/03/2009 1:06:07 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Folks, where he was born is IRRELEVANT.

What is? you might ask.

WHO HIS FATHER IS.

His father was a British citizen, a Kenyan as well.

You CANNOT be a Natural Born Citizen if you have a parent who is a FOREIGN NATIONAL.

OBAMA IS AN USURPER and should be jailed immediately along with ALL those who aided and abetted this MASSIVE fraud on the United States.

He must be removed immediately in order to end what is nothing short of a constitutional crisis. The veneer of Law in the US is thinner than the skin of your teeth right now!


156 posted on 10/03/2009 4:21:46 PM PDT by Danae (No political party should pick candidates. That's the voters job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Wrong

Obama Sr was a British citizen, Obama is a British American, and therefore Ineligible for POTUS.

Unless of course Obama Sr. isn’t his father....


157 posted on 10/03/2009 4:23:03 PM PDT by Danae (No political party should pick candidates. That's the voters job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

Read later.


158 posted on 10/03/2009 4:23:42 PM PDT by OKSooner ("He's quite mad, you know." - Sean Connery to Honor Blackman in "Goldfinger".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Not according to the laws and practices of the United States in 1961 and since.


159 posted on 10/03/2009 8:03:53 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (If you're not a Reagan Personhood ProLifer, you're a holocaust enabler, either actively or passively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

bs


160 posted on 10/04/2009 1:09:45 AM PDT by Danae (No political party should pick candidates. That's the voters job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson