Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: NormsRevenge
oh noze- next, a Park Czar
2 posted on
07/01/2009 12:43:23 PM PDT by
silverleaf
("Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal ( Martin Luther King))
To: NormsRevenge
Translation:
“Don’t worry, we will force tax payers in other states to pay for those parks so your illegals can keep enjoying them”.
3 posted on
07/01/2009 12:45:03 PM PDT by
icwhatudo
(For every clinic bombed or burned, 17 to 18 churches are burned down. MSM? MSM?)
To: NormsRevenge
Let the Feds have them.
It's the last thing they actually want.
4 posted on
07/01/2009 12:46:23 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
To: NormsRevenge
Let them. It’s an empty threat.
5 posted on
07/01/2009 12:46:36 PM PDT by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
To: NormsRevenge
This kind of brings up a question I have: How does the federal government own land? Unless the fed pays a state for real property, or it’s not owned privately, all land should belong to the state in which it is inside the borders of. You know - states right, that kind of thing.
6 posted on
07/01/2009 12:47:27 PM PDT by
jeffc
(They're coming to take me away! Ha-ha, hey-hey, ho-ho!)
To: NormsRevenge
Can you identify the parks involved?
To: NormsRevenge
Lower taxes, deport illegals, end unions and cut 50% of the bureaucrats.
There, fixed the State.
14 posted on
07/01/2009 1:00:28 PM PDT by
wac3rd
(80 Carter/Obama 08)
To: NormsRevenge
I always thought the US Constitution forbid the feds from owning State lands.
15 posted on
07/01/2009 1:01:10 PM PDT by
CodeToad
(If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
To: NormsRevenge
Good... Let Ice Cream take care of them. We have enough to pay for already.
19 posted on
07/01/2009 1:03:26 PM PDT by
Redcloak
("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: NormsRevenge
Now that makes a lot of sense. Not.
21 posted on
07/01/2009 1:09:31 PM PDT by
fightinJAG
(Good riddance, UAW.)
To: NormsRevenge
Wildlands Project in action.
This is what the Global Agenda 21 really looks like.
25 posted on
07/01/2009 1:44:23 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(Indolence is the enemy of a republic.)
To: NormsRevenge
I don’t go to any of those parks so I don’t care. ;)
29 posted on
07/01/2009 1:50:34 PM PDT by
Cinnamon Girl
(G-d Bless President Bush. He kept us safe.)
To: NormsRevenge
Revert to the feds? California would be better off selling them off... maybe they could use them for nuclear power plants. Bwahahahaha!
31 posted on
07/01/2009 1:54:08 PM PDT by
rhombus
To: NormsRevenge
Ain’t that all a part of the PLAN?!
32 posted on
07/01/2009 1:54:26 PM PDT by
patriot preacher
(To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
To: NormsRevenge
Hey, if they're divvying up parts of California, I'll take Yosemite.
34 posted on
07/01/2009 1:57:25 PM PDT by
wolfcreek
(KMTEXASA!)
To: NormsRevenge
Somehow I doubt the budget of the 220 state parks was doubled over the last ten years. So my question is, why are they designated to take the brunt of the budget shortfall?
Shouldn't the cuts now be limited to the agencies that saw their budgets skyrocket in fact double or more over the last ten years?
I guess that's just too logical for big government.
The following is directed to all Freepers in general.
Some Freepers see everything through a red, white, and blue filter. Lets prove right now how many of us do. 1% of the Freepathon total has been reached.
Do the deed. Click those smiling faces right now. Spread the word...
36 posted on
07/01/2009 1:59:46 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(_res__ent of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama)
To: NormsRevenge
Parks next, then harbors, ports and coastlines. It’s clear what they want to do. We own the bottom of the ocean 8 feet out from where the water begins. That was owned by the state, deeded over back in the 50’s. When we purchased the home is is now ours. Obviously we paid more than some due to that. Granted, we don’t own the water, but nobody can anchor or touch the bottom which means they can’t bottom fish, take lobster, spear, etc. They can’t even stand on the bottom. It is private property. Hell will freeze over before those scumbags try to take it without paying dearly, as I did, for it.
37 posted on
07/01/2009 2:00:08 PM PDT by
mojitojoe
(All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
To: NormsRevenge
Now the feds are going to Nationalize the states.
39 posted on
07/01/2009 2:07:16 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
To: NormsRevenge
What about privatization?
To: NormsRevenge
Maybe the Federal government should take California back and reallocate it as 5 separate states (to conservative majorities)...
46 posted on
07/01/2009 2:37:43 PM PDT by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson