Skip to comments.
Feds could seize Calif. parks if closed by budget (threaten to seize 6 state parks if closed)
ap on Sac bee ^
| 7/1/09
| AP
Posted on 07/01/2009 12:41:54 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- The California governor's office says federal officials are threatening to seize six state parks if they are closed to help balance the state's budget.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has proposed closing 220 state parks.
But the National Park Service warned in a letter to Schwarzenegger that six of those parks are on former federal land that could revert to the U.S. government if they are not kept open as parks.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; feds; parks; schwarzenegger; seize; stateparks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
To: NormsRevenge
Now that makes a lot of sense. Not.
21
posted on
07/01/2009 1:09:31 PM PDT
by
fightinJAG
(Good riddance, UAW.)
To: jeffc
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Wrong. Carol Browner wants to shut them down permanently. The Feds will take every acre of State land they can get their hands on and turn it over to the UN and seal all entrances. This is coming.
To: Jewbacca
With the exception of TexasTexas isn't so much an exception as an anomaly. Since Texas acquired all its land itself, in its war of independence from Mexico, there was no federal land for the federal government to keep when it was annexed and became a state. There is a clause in the annexation agreement that stipulates that the unoccupied lands belonging to Texas would remain with Texas.
24
posted on
07/01/2009 1:43:10 PM PDT
by
Bubba Ho-Tep
("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
To: NormsRevenge
Wildlands Project in action.
This is what the Global Agenda 21 really looks like.
25
posted on
07/01/2009 1:44:23 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(Indolence is the enemy of a republic.)
To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Texas isn't so much an exception as an anomaly. Since Texas acquired all its land itself, in its war of independence from Mexico, there was no federal land for the federal government to keep when it was annexed and became a state. California went through a similar step in that it declared its independence from Mexico prior to annexation.
26
posted on
07/01/2009 1:48:26 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(Indolence is the enemy of a republic.)
To: olivia3boys
The NPS does hit you with a fee, but you can buy an “Adventure Pass” for a year. I think it would equal about what the fees are. The parks are the only thing I would miss.
27
posted on
07/01/2009 1:49:27 PM PDT
by
Lou Budvis
(Palin Nation = Reagan Country.)
To: Jewbacca
“With the exception of Texas.”
Have you got something against Hawaii? Or the original thirteen states?
28
posted on
07/01/2009 1:49:32 PM PDT
by
KrisKrinkle
(Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
To: NormsRevenge
I don’t go to any of those parks so I don’t care. ;)
29
posted on
07/01/2009 1:50:34 PM PDT
by
Cinnamon Girl
(G-d Bless President Bush. He kept us safe.)
To: icwhatudo
Yep, let the Feds claim the lands, then move all of the Illegal Aliens there.
That gets the illegals out of state jurisdiction, and state benefits, many benefits of which are federally-mandated.
It kills two burdens with stone.
30
posted on
07/01/2009 1:53:11 PM PDT
by
BP2
(I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
To: NormsRevenge
Revert to the feds? California would be better off selling them off... maybe they could use them for nuclear power plants. Bwahahahaha!
31
posted on
07/01/2009 1:54:08 PM PDT
by
rhombus
To: NormsRevenge
Ain’t that all a part of the PLAN?!
32
posted on
07/01/2009 1:54:26 PM PDT
by
patriot preacher
(To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I don’t know about that... I think they want anything and everything they can get their hands on.
Remember Rahm’s Rule about never wasting a good crisis : /
Tatt
33
posted on
07/01/2009 1:56:32 PM PDT
by
thesearethetimes...
("Courage, is fear that has said its prayers." DorothyBernard)
To: NormsRevenge
Hey, if they're divvying up parts of California, I'll take Yosemite.
34
posted on
07/01/2009 1:57:25 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(KMTEXASA!)
To: KrisKrinkle
Figured Hawaii was similar, but didn’t think about the first 13.
35
posted on
07/01/2009 1:59:10 PM PDT
by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
To: NormsRevenge
Somehow I doubt the budget of the 220 state parks was doubled over the last ten years. So my question is, why are they designated to take the brunt of the budget shortfall?
Shouldn't the cuts now be limited to the agencies that saw their budgets skyrocket in fact double or more over the last ten years?
I guess that's just too logical for big government.
The following is directed to all Freepers in general.
Some Freepers see everything through a red, white, and blue filter. Lets prove right now how many of us do. 1% of the Freepathon total has been reached.
Do the deed. Click those smiling faces right now. Spread the word...
36
posted on
07/01/2009 1:59:46 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(_res__ent of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama)
To: NormsRevenge
Parks next, then harbors, ports and coastlines. It’s clear what they want to do. We own the bottom of the ocean 8 feet out from where the water begins. That was owned by the state, deeded over back in the 50’s. When we purchased the home is is now ours. Obviously we paid more than some due to that. Granted, we don’t own the water, but nobody can anchor or touch the bottom which means they can’t bottom fish, take lobster, spear, etc. They can’t even stand on the bottom. It is private property. Hell will freeze over before those scumbags try to take it without paying dearly, as I did, for it.
37
posted on
07/01/2009 2:00:08 PM PDT
by
mojitojoe
(All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
To: Jewbacca
38
posted on
07/01/2009 2:02:30 PM PDT
by
KrisKrinkle
(Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
To: NormsRevenge
Now the feds are going to Nationalize the states.
39
posted on
07/01/2009 2:07:16 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
To: Redcloak
At least POTUS doubles as the Ice Cream Czar...
40
posted on
07/01/2009 2:09:15 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson