Skip to comments.
US cities may have to be bulldozed in order to survive
Telegraph (U.K.) ^
| June 12, 2009
| Tom Leonard
Posted on 06/12/2009 11:11:02 AM PDT by Schnucki
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-198 next last
To: dragnet2
As we may have discussed before, Center City is still in good shape, and their has been some (not enough) improvement in the near North. See our heritage in Independence Park, hit a restaurant and do your shopping on Walnut Street, but don’t go north of the expressway or west of 30th Street Station unless you want to see the Fourth World.
21
posted on
06/12/2009 11:19:02 AM PDT
by
Clemenza
(Remember our Korean War Veterans)
To: Schnucki
Sounds good to me. The section 8 jerks can camp in a park or live in a tree.
22
posted on
06/12/2009 11:19:08 AM PDT
by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: JRios1968
"Where have we heard this term before...hmmmm... "
Well, some of those places could use some pacification.
23
posted on
06/12/2009 11:19:49 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
To: CaptainAmiigaf
I think this is where it will be in < 5 yrs...
24
posted on
06/12/2009 11:20:05 AM PDT
by
MrB
(Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
To: Owl_Eagle
This idea in places like Detroit (iirc) where there are tens of thousands of empty houses, may not be a bad one.
25
posted on
06/12/2009 11:20:46 AM PDT
by
DonaldC
To: Schnucki
sounds eerily similar to a plan implemented by Nicolae Ceauşescu in Romania, shortly before they strung him up. Bulldozing large sections of Flint is an idea that has occurred to some other people. Would make an interesting plot for yet another Michael Moore film...
To: Schnucki
Who is going to own the cleared properties? Let me guess.....Comrade Obama
To: Schnucki
how dumb. especially for the fedgov. Let the cities do what they like, especially 25% of Detroit.
Don't force cities to condemn private property.
bye bye property rights
28
posted on
06/12/2009 11:21:13 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com <----go there now,----> tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
To: Schnucki
While the New Urbanism crowd is looking to march suburbanites back into the cities and plow their houses under.
Vee like being crowded into cities. You vill too.
29
posted on
06/12/2009 11:21:25 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Chrysler and GM are what Marx meant by the means of production.)
To: Schnucki
The Kenyan has already bulldozed his way through The Constitution, so what’s a few cities here or there?
To: GeronL
property rights? what’s that?
That’s so... old America.
31
posted on
06/12/2009 11:22:21 AM PDT
by
MrB
(Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
To: Schnucki
it could also take the concept of Gerrymandering to a whole new level...
To: FreeSouthernAmerican
What if I dont want to live in a crowded, stinky area?We'll have none of that talk. Now, run along little worker bee and get back to your assigned task in the hive.
33
posted on
06/12/2009 11:24:26 AM PDT
by
Zeddicus
To: Schnucki
Obama administration ... economic decline
34
posted on
06/12/2009 11:24:45 AM PDT
by
ComputerGuy
(0bama - A waste is a terrible thing to mind)
To: Schnucki
Many of our large cities seem to not be able to sustain themselves. It’s usually blamed on some policy, stupidity, lack of planning, politics, demographics — something that was a mistake.
But maybe these large concentrations of people, streets and other things are inherently self-destroying, and that fixing the cities is not a matter of eliminating mistakes. Perhaps they reach a point where bulldozing and restarting is the only cure, along with a hope that the rebuilt cities will fare better.
35
posted on
06/12/2009 11:25:05 AM PDT
by
frposty
(I'm a simpleton)
To: ConservativeMan55
HOnestly he is right about this, though I am somewhat amazed there is no
-
Cities like Buffalo, where I grew up are laid out for more than a half a million people, right now the population is south of two hundred and fifty thousand. There are neighborhoods falling apart and it would be nice if the city would just plow them over make some Olmsted like parks and imporve live in the city..
36
posted on
06/12/2009 11:27:16 AM PDT
by
N3WBI3
(Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
To: N3WBI3
To: Clemenza
A lot of Kensington, too.
I worked at two offices in the area ( one block from K&A and Hunting Park) in 1999. Lots of boarded up homes and businesses then. It must be worse now, and the blight has probably moved further up Frankford Ave.
To: Zeddicus
“Now, run along little worker bee and get back to your assigned task in the hive. “
Somebody needs to photoshop obama into a borg image...hehe
39
posted on
06/12/2009 11:29:16 AM PDT
by
DonaldC
To: Schnucki
The real question is not whether these cities shrink we're all shrinking but whether we let it happen in a destructive or sustainable way," said Mr Kildee. We're not shrinking in Texas, but if enough more Californians move here to vote in the stuff that killed California, all bets are off.
40
posted on
06/12/2009 11:29:39 AM PDT
by
Richard Kimball
(We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-198 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson