Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unlike Romney's "National Council for a New America," Free Republic is a conservative site!
Refer to Romney's Council for a New American Socialist State formed in HIS Image ^ | May 2, 2009 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 05/03/2009 12:32:07 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

I'm going to try one more time to explain what FR is all about.

Free Republic is a conservative site. That does not necessarily mean it is a Republican site. In fact there may be many Republicans we don't support and some Republican issues we cannot agree with.

I'll throw in Arlen Specter as a prime example of a Republican we cannot support. Should be obvious to all why not. Should also be just as obvious to all that we cannot support Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, John McCain and his lap dog Lindsay Graham, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, et al.

Some of the issues we cannot support as conservatives even though sometimes initiated by so-called Republicans include TARP, or any kind of government bailout of private enterprise, federal intrusion into free markets, federalized education systems, government provided or controlled health care systems, abortion, gay marriage, amnesty, global warming, gun control, etc.

I guess there is more than one definition of conservatism floating around out there, and this won't be text book, but the one we use involves defending, preserving and protecting our constitution, our unalienable rights, our traditional family values, our American heritage, our nation, our borders and our sovereignty.

We aggressively defend our rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness!

We aggressively defend our rights to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom to keep and bear arms, right to due process, right to equality under the law, right to be governed under the rule of law, right to constitutionally limited government, right to corruption free government, right to self-government and our private property rights, etc.

We also aggressively defend our right to state and local government for all issues not expressly delegated to the central government by the constitution.

We aggressively defend our rights to free markets and our rights to live our lives free of government intrusion, interference, coercion, force, or abuse of any kind.

We aggressively defend our rights to national sovereignty, state sovereignty and individual sovereignty!

And this definition also includes aggressively fighting against all enemies foreign and domestic who may try to deprive us of our rights or sovereignty. This would obviously include all foreign enemies, but also we defend against RINOS, Democrats, liberals, socialists, Marxists, communists, militant feminists or homosexualists, radical environmentalists, etc, etc, etc.

And we expect our elected representatives to also aggressively defend our rights and fight against all enemies foreign and domestic. We do not elect people and send them to DC or our state capitals, etc, to reach across the aisles or to be bipartisan or to negotiate or compromise away our rights. If you're not going to aggressively fight for us, and for our rights, STAY OUT!!

We bow to no king but God!

Our God-given unalienable rights are NOT negotiable!

Do NOT Tread on US!

Thank you very much!


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Free Republic; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bugzapper; conservatism; conservative; donttreadonme; duncanhunter; elections; fr; freerepublic; giulianitruthfile; goawaymittlovers; jimrob; liberty; mccaintruthfile; mittbots; mittromney; nc4na; ncna; nomorerinos; purgetherinos; romney; romneybots; romneytruthfile; slickmitt; slickwillard; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,441-1,449 next last
To: library user; Protest

Reread what Protest said. Protest was referring to a place where he/she (Protest) could sometimes make sense.


61 posted on 05/03/2009 12:51:51 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: alice_in_bubbaland

No, because, thankfully it still IS a free Republic.


62 posted on 05/03/2009 12:52:23 PM PDT by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Amen! And might I add “Political Correctness” to the list.


63 posted on 05/03/2009 12:52:29 PM PDT by BnBlFlag (Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Free Republic is a conservative site

Hell yeah! Let's have some Roast RINO for supper.

64 posted on 05/03/2009 12:52:59 PM PDT by McGruff (When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
If you are paid to do a job, you do that job.

“Team Mitt Inc.” bloggers are paid to “pretend” to be one of us and spread the Romney “Myth”...

They will not go anymore willingly than anyone else who loves their job...

65 posted on 05/03/2009 12:53:27 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway

LOL...

Indeed...


66 posted on 05/03/2009 12:55:06 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Lindsay Graham? I guess I will agree with you just on the basis of his membership in the “Gang of 14” and support of Bank Nationalization(socialism) but he is redeemable he did support Clinton’s impeachment and put his blood and sweat into it, right?

Anyway we will never have the level of conservative policies we desire until we have a larger change in the media. Isn’t obvious they were the larges factor in Obomanations election? Could also use some party discipline where party members could vote to kick people out of the party so as to maintain the purity of our brand and image, no?


67 posted on 05/03/2009 12:55:19 PM PDT by steve0 (My plan B: christianexodus.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
In other words, I think they’re far less likely to merely take their ball and go home of their own accord.

Then they need to be shown the door.

68 posted on 05/03/2009 12:55:40 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

FR is like good single malt Scots Whisky

-It’s complex
-It’s strong...often too strong for some!
-It’s misunderstood and feared by the easily-swayed
-It’s absolutely hated by some...and those individuals are determined to force others to share their opinion via large and small attacks on free speech and freedom of choice.

You’re right...it’s not for everyone!


69 posted on 05/03/2009 12:55:47 PM PDT by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
As a governor, Mitt left behind for his state, an appalling legacy of the most aggressive and egregious gay rights legislation in the country. School programs openly advocate the gay lifestyle in lurid detail at all levels. The state government has installed various gay activists in high level positions to further the homosexual agenda in all walks of life.

... The governor had nothing to do with these thing? Really!? People just don't seem to get it about Mitt. I don't know why.

70 posted on 05/03/2009 12:56:03 PM PDT by auntyfemenist (Fetch the royal iPod..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Ronaldus Maximus. He went his own way, which happened to be the way my parents raised me.


71 posted on 05/03/2009 12:56:22 PM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thanks Jim!
72 posted on 05/03/2009 12:56:44 PM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user

Romney is a slick opportunist. He is better than, say, McCain, who is driven by a genuine commitment to liberalism in many areas. Romney will be conservative if it is in his advantage to be conservative - a semi-reliable opportunist, if you will.

That, however, does not make him worthy of active FR support. Someone has to guard the non-RINO core values, after all...


73 posted on 05/03/2009 12:56:56 PM PDT by oscars300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Sadly, you have to explain this at least once every year it seems.

Keep up the great work, and thank you for this conservative bastion in an increasingly leftist liberal world!


74 posted on 05/03/2009 12:57:06 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
Thank God the fight with the "MITTENS" has been won (on FR a least).

I hate arguing with those morons.

75 posted on 05/03/2009 12:57:30 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; wagglebee

Thanks for the ping Wagglebee. This should be in breaking news.


76 posted on 05/03/2009 12:57:54 PM PDT by BykrBayb (May God have mercy on our souls. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

JimRob’s got the cutlass in his teeth!


77 posted on 05/03/2009 12:58:19 PM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( AR2, Overdue! = American Revolution II...Overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relictele

That was a good breakdown. It’s an alpha site with some darn good fightin’!


78 posted on 05/03/2009 12:58:35 PM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Here here.


79 posted on 05/03/2009 12:59:36 PM PDT by Nachum (the complete list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Bump!


80 posted on 05/03/2009 12:59:37 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,441-1,449 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson