Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi: I didn't know about waterboarding
The Politico ^

Posted on 04/23/2009 1:50:30 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Pelosi: I didn't know about waterboarding

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is pushing back on GOP charges that she knew about waterboarding for years and did nothing.

Pelosi says she was briefed by Bush administration officials on the legal justification for using waterboarding — but that they never followed through on promises to inform her when they actually began using "enhanced" interrogation techniques

"In that or any other briefing…we were not, and I repeat, we're not told that waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation techniques were used. What they did tell us is that they had some legislative counsel ... opinions that they could be used," she told reporters today.

Earlier, House Minority Leader John Boehner (D-Ohio) criticized Pelosi and other Democratic leaders for backing probes into the use of waterboarding — after failing to raise objections during briefings on its potential use.

"Well, yesterday I saw a partial list of the number of members of the House and Senate, Democrats and Republicans, who were briefed on these interrogation methods and not a word was raised at the time, not one word," Boehner told reporters at his weekly news availability.

"And I think you're going to hear more and more about the bigger picture here, that what — the war on terror after 9/11 was done in a bipartisan basis on lots of fronts. And that bigger story will be coming out," he added.

Pelosi says members who receive classified intelligence briefings are powerless to act on them — or even discuss them with staff.

As a consequence, some members simply skip the meetings, so they aren't "hamstrung" by confidentiality requirements.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cia; democrats; pelosi; pelosiknew; pelosiwaterboarding; torture; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-202 next last
To: Sub-Driver

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SsFK3JJ_-E


121 posted on 04/23/2009 3:02:28 PM PDT by Gator113 (I'm a PROUD RIGHT WING EXTREMIST.... Obama has failed, IMPEACH Obama NOW....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I’ll bet she has to water-board her husband to get him to , er, go to bed.


122 posted on 04/23/2009 3:05:56 PM PDT by Gator113 (I'm a PROUD RIGHT WING EXTREMIST.... Obama has failed, IMPEACH Obama NOW....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

It would be fun to see her try that under oath!


123 posted on 04/23/2009 3:07:00 PM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Congress can deny funds to pay for this detention or treatment.


124 posted on 04/23/2009 3:14:07 PM PDT by uscabjd ( a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: top 2 toe red
How and when are we gonna get rid of this hag?


125 posted on 04/23/2009 3:14:10 PM PDT by mentor2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“What they did tell us is that they had some legislative counsel ... opinions that they could be used,” she told reporters today.”

That’s sufficient. What did she do about it then?!


126 posted on 04/23/2009 3:27:32 PM PDT by dervish (I'm the President see me bow (at 0:50) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S60U-hl35Gw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golfisnr1
Porter Goss (Former CIA Director) Says she was briefed on waterboarding and asked if that was enough.

Now I do believe him!

and asked if that was enough.

Now could we clarify that ?

127 posted on 04/23/2009 3:37:37 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Aren’t we suppose to excerpt from that source?


128 posted on 04/23/2009 3:39:18 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Threaten to cut off her botox.

She'll sing like a bird.

129 posted on 04/23/2009 3:40:38 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (When you're spinning round, things come undone. Welcome to Earth 3rd rock from the Sun!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
From the comments section:

*********************************************

Nancy, Nancy maybe you should check with Hiliar on how to put together a big story. Another Dumacrat with told tales to their simple followers. 2007 Washington Post story. Here are some key graphs: In September 2002, four members of Congress met in secret for a first look at a unique CIA program designed to wring vital information from reticent terrorism suspects in U.S. custody. For more than an hour, the bipartisan group, which included current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), was given a virtual tour of the CIA's overseas detention sites and the harsh techniques interrogators had devised to try to make their prisoners talk. Among the techniques described, said two officials present, was waterboarding, a practice that years later would be condemned as torture by Democrats and some Republicans on Capitol Hill. But on that day, no objections were raised. Instead, at least two lawmakers in the room asked the CIA to push harder, two U.S. officials said. "The briefer was specifically asked if the methods were tough enough," said a U.S. official who witnessed the exchange. ... Yet long before "waterboarding" entered the public discourse, the CIA gave key legislative overseers about 30 private briefings, some of which included descriptions of that technique and other harsh interrogation methods, according to interviews with multiple U.S. officials with firsthand knowledge. With one known exception, no formal objections were raised by the lawmakers briefed about the harsh methods during the two years in which waterboarding was employed, from 2002 to 2003, said Democrats and Republicans with direct knowledge of the matter. The lawmakers who held oversight roles during the period included Pelosi and Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) and Sens. Bob Graham (D-Fla.) and John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), as well as Rep. Porter J. Goss (R-Fla.) and Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan). ... Only after information about the practice began to leak in news accounts in 2005 -- by which time the CIA had already abandoned waterboarding -- did doubts about its legality among individual lawmakers evolve into more widespread dissent. The opposition reached a boiling point this past October, when Democratic lawmakers condemned the practice during Michael B. Mukasey's confirmation hearings for attorney general. Pelosi declined to comment directly on her reaction to the classified briefings. But a congressional source familiar with Pelosi's position on the matter said the California lawmaker did recall discussions about enhanced interrogation. The source said Pelosi recalls that techniques described by the CIA were still in the planning stage -- they had been designed and cleared with agency lawyers but not yet put in practice -- and acknowledged that Pelosi did not raise objections at the time. ... Harman, who replaced Pelosi as the committee's top Democrat in January 2003, disclosed Friday that she filed a classified letter to the CIA in February of that year as an official protest about the interrogation program. Harman said she had been prevented from publicly discussing the letter or the CIA's program because of strict rules of secrecy.

130 posted on 04/23/2009 3:42:55 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The first such briefing dealt with the interrogation of Abu Zubaydah, the Al Qaeda operations chief who ran the training camps in Afghanistan where the Sept. 11 hijackers were trained. Sources said California Rep. Nancy Pelosi, now the speaker of the House, attended the meeting with then-Rep. Porter Goss, R-Fla. (who later became CIA director), and she did not raise any objections.


131 posted on 04/23/2009 3:44:03 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Excellent....now she is really nailed....


132 posted on 04/23/2009 3:45:12 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: True Republican Patriot; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; tubebender; Carry_Okie; blam; ...
ROFL!

Must remember:

Bugeyes Piglousy wants the Executive Jets, the Status Bodyguards, and to pretend she is third in command

133 posted on 04/23/2009 3:51:12 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

She’s so full of BS that it Spewing out of her eyes, ears, mouth and nose.


134 posted on 04/23/2009 3:53:31 PM PDT by roaddog727 (Built Ford tough not Obama weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sf4dubya

Yes, she is, and it will be only a few days before document proving it will come out.


135 posted on 04/23/2009 3:54:03 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Socialism is the belief that most people are better off if everyone was equally poor and miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
I understand there’s a bridge in Brooklyn that’s for sale?

And according to Dick Morris on the Factor last night ...that bridge in NYC is still there because of info from wiretaps and interrogation ...a plot to cut the cables was found and stopped....

136 posted on 04/23/2009 3:57:15 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sf4dubya

And with such ease do her lies slide out, seems pathological..there is no shame in her dictioonary..


137 posted on 04/23/2009 3:59:24 PM PDT by aeonspromise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
If she didn't know, why didn't she object when the Washington Post reported a couple years ago that she did? Why didn't she challenge the reports then?

In September 2002, four members of Congress met in secret for a first look at a unique CIA program designed to wring vital information from reticent terrorism suspects in U.S. custody. For more than an hour, the bipartisan group, which included current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), was given a virtual tour of the CIA's overseas detention sites and the harsh techniques interrogators had devised to try to make their prisoners talk.

Among the techniques described, said two officials present, was waterboarding, a practice that years later would be condemned as torture by Democrats and some Republicans on Capitol Hill. But on that day, no objections were raised. Instead, at least two lawmakers in the room asked the CIA to push harder, two U.S. officials said.

"The briefer was specifically asked if the methods were tough enough," said a U.S. official who witnessed the exchange.

Congressional leaders from both parties would later seize on waterboarding as a symbol of the worst excesses of the Bush administration's counterterrorism effort. The CIA last week admitted that videotape of an interrogation of one of the waterboarded detainees was destroyed in 2005 against the advice of Justice Department and White House officials, provoking allegations that its actions were illegal and the destruction was a coverup.

Yet long before "waterboarding" entered the public discourse, the CIA gave key legislative overseers about 30 private briefings, some of which included descriptions of that technique and other harsh interrogation methods, according to interviews with multiple U.S. officials with firsthand knowledge.

With one known exception, no formal objections were raised by the lawmakers briefed about the harsh methods during the two years in which waterboarding was employed, from 2002 to 2003, said Democrats and Republicans with direct knowledge of the matter. The lawmakers who held oversight roles during the period included Pelosi and Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) and Sens. Bob Graham (D-Fla.) and John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), as well as Rep. Porter J. Goss (R-Fla.) and Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan).

Individual lawmakers' recollections of the early briefings varied dramatically, but officials present during the meetings described the reaction as mostly quiet acquiescence, if not outright support. "Among those being briefed, there was a pretty full understanding of what the CIA was doing," said Goss, who chaired the House intelligence committee from 1997 to 2004 and then served as CIA director from 2004 to 2006. "And the reaction in the room was not just approval, but encouragement."

With one known exception, no formal objections were raised by the lawmakers briefed about the harsh methods during the two years in which waterboarding was employed, from 2002 to 2003, said Democrats and Republicans with direct knowledge of the matter. The lawmakers who held oversight roles during the period included Pelosi and Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) and Sens. Bob Graham (D-Fla.) and John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), as well as Rep. Porter J. Goss (R-Fla.) and Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan).

Individual lawmakers' recollections of the early briefings varied dramatically, but officials present during the meetings described the reaction as mostly quiet acquiescence, if not outright support. "Among those being briefed, there was a pretty full understanding of what the CIA was doing," said Goss, who chaired the House intelligence committee from 1997 to 2004 and then served as CIA director from 2004 to 2006. "And the reaction in the room was not just approval, but encouragement."


138 posted on 04/23/2009 4:00:41 PM PDT by SeafoodGumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I guess it’s pointless to complain about Dems lack of integrity. I believe Pelousy is besting Slick Willy’s record for lying. What is wrong with these people? Can’t they admit the truth just once in their rotten lives?


139 posted on 04/23/2009 4:10:10 PM PDT by driftless2 (four)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

OK I am absolutely fed up with the beltway LIARS who are stealing from our children and padding their slovenly existence with money robbed from hard working legal citizens. It is a felony.


140 posted on 04/23/2009 4:10:12 PM PDT by Shady (The Fairness Doctrine is ANYTHING but fair!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson