1 posted on
04/10/2009 4:24:43 PM PDT by
GOPGuide
To: GOPGuide
2 posted on
04/10/2009 4:25:09 PM PDT by
GOPGuide
To: SunkenCiv
To: GOPGuide
Looks like the liberals are having a tough time trying taking over Easter this year.
6 posted on
04/10/2009 5:04:36 PM PDT by
mtg
To: GOPGuide
If the Shroud is fake, it is really, really good fake. An almost unbelievably good fake considering the technology of the era. I am not a Christian but I do have an open mind about this.
7 posted on
04/10/2009 5:06:08 PM PDT by
Jeff Gordon
(I don't trust Obama with my country. Do you?)
To: GOPGuide
HAPPY EASTER... PRAISE GOD!
LLS
9 posted on
04/10/2009 5:08:38 PM PDT by
LibLieSlayer
(hussein will NEVER be my President... NEVER!!!)
To: GOPGuide
10 posted on
04/10/2009 5:11:34 PM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: GOPGuide
Virtually all carbon-dating is flawed. It works fine if you have a closed system, but most pld stuff has been subject to distortions
12 posted on
04/10/2009 5:14:47 PM PDT by
cookcounty
(Obama's got Bush's inheritance .......and now he wants your kids'.)
To: GOPGuide
At the time he argued firmly that the shroud, which bears a Christlike image, was a clever forgery. That was the same time the Pope announced he had converted to Islam
18 posted on
04/10/2009 6:16:21 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(Obama decision of the week. To order in Pizza)
To: GOPGuide
It would seem if you take the bible literally then the carbon dating is irrelevant. If you accept carbon dating for the shroud, you kinda have to accept carbon dating that shows the earth is much older than 6,000 years.
19 posted on
04/10/2009 6:28:05 PM PDT by
yazoo
(was)
To: GOPGuide
God doesn’t need special effects.
To: GOPGuide
22 posted on
04/10/2009 6:41:49 PM PDT by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: GOPGuide
Wow. If I remember correctly, Rogers was a pretty hard-core shroud skeptic.
23 posted on
04/10/2009 6:43:43 PM PDT by
Antoninus
(Now accepting apologies from repentant Mittens.)
To: GOPGuide
The shroud is conclusively not a painted image and has properties that could not have been known in Medieval times. So if it is a Medieval fake how was it made?
To: GOPGuide
It really doesn’t matter to me whether or not the shroud is a fake - I believe Jesus Christ died and rose again. A burial cloth is irrelevant to my faith.
Happy Easter, everyone!
28 posted on
04/10/2009 7:20:19 PM PDT by
reagan_fanatic
(We've gone from Jefferson to the Jeffersons)
To: GOPGuide
the question is, does it matter if it was a medievel fake or two thousand years old, who is to say that it really is the visage of christ?
32 posted on
04/10/2009 10:50:20 PM PDT by
Nipplemancer
(Abolish the DEA !)
To: Alamo-Girl; albee; AnalogReigns; AnAmericanMother; Angelas; AniGrrl; annalex; annyokie; ...
Another report on the Discovery Channel documentary on Ray Rogers findings about the 1988 C14 tests... this one from the UK. PING!
  If you want on or off the Shroud of Turin Ping List, Freepmail me.
|
|
|
34 posted on
04/10/2009 11:09:00 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
(Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
To: Pyro7480; NYer; narses
40 posted on
04/11/2009 12:18:28 PM PDT by
Coleus
(Abortion, Euthanasia & FOCA - - don't Obama and the Democrats just kill ya!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson