1 posted on
03/20/2009 10:00:48 AM PDT by
GOP_Lady
To: GOP_Lady
The following transcript is edited for brevity and clarity:
Flag....
2 posted on
03/20/2009 10:01:42 AM PDT by
jessduntno
( www.SenateConservatives.com)
To: GOP_Lady
3 posted on
03/20/2009 10:01:44 AM PDT by
GOP_Lady
To: GOP_Lady
“learning on the fly?”
Bill Clinton must be tutoring him ;o)
4 posted on
03/20/2009 10:03:10 AM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: GOP_Lady
Saying that O is “learning on the fly” is a polite way of saying it.
The only choices I can see are “learning on the fly” [as in ignorant] or purely [Saul Alinsky trained], [Soros planned] evil.
5 posted on
03/20/2009 10:03:41 AM PDT by
daylilly
To: GOP_Lady
everybody is mad at AIG and their executives for doing what they did. But to suggest that this is not the fault of the people in Congress who passed the specific measure allowing them to take these bonuses is a diversionary tactic and wrong. I agree.
You don't have a government take punitive action against a small group of people. Frankly, it's unconstitutional, in my view.
I agree.
7 posted on
03/20/2009 10:05:57 AM PDT by
marron
To: GOP_Lady
Or as the fliers used to say, “seat of the pants flying.”
To: GOP_Lady
Why does Mitt make the completely unsupported assumption that he is learning?
To: GOP_Lady
Compare Romney to that classless twit in the WH, no comparison.
To: GOP_Lady
12 posted on
03/20/2009 10:11:22 AM PDT by
keepitreal
(Obama brings change: an international crisis (terrorism) within 6 months)
To: GOP_Lady
Hmmmm. Where does he see evidence Obama is, “learning?”
13 posted on
03/20/2009 10:11:37 AM PDT by
nickcarraway
(Are the Good Times Really Over?)
To: GOP_Lady
What evidence do we have that he’s learning? Smirky’s too busy running around seeking adulation. All of Clinton’s needy narcissism without the charm.
15 posted on
03/20/2009 10:14:27 AM PDT by
Trod Upon
(Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
To: GOP_Lady
Many people in the Conservative Movement and the Republican Party didn't like Romney. They worked against him even thought he was our most viable candidate. They wanted the PERFECT conservative.
Well in this world we rarely get the PERFECT anything. Romney would have been a good candidate, surely better than McCain. If there had not been so many candidates early on then Romney just might have won.
We will never know for sure but I believe Romney could have beaten Obama. Certainly the age factor would have worked to the advantage of Romney and not against him. Yes the DemocRATs would have tried to smear him with the Mormon thing, but I don't think it would have worked.
Don't get me wrong, Romney isn't my perfect candidate, BUT he was the candidate who had the best chance of winning out of the choices we had.
Those of you who opposed Romney bear a lot of the responsibility for the situation we are now in with Obama.
16 posted on
03/20/2009 10:14:54 AM PDT by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough!)
To: GOP_Lady
Didn’t know Romney’s wife has MS...
17 posted on
03/20/2009 10:15:41 AM PDT by
rock_lobsta
(Atypical Crustacean)
To: GOP_Lady
For some reason, the words “Yoicks! And away!” [BONK!] come to mind.
19 posted on
03/20/2009 10:18:01 AM PDT by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: GOP_Lady
This is a president who is learning on the fly.
He certainly is.
He and his handlers are hurriedly and clumsily trying to correct our (The Constitution is fundamentally flawed
) nation.
The AIG bonus language was buried in the fine print of legislation.
That is likely the tip of alarming new laws that will surface in time out of legislation that our Congressmen did not have time to read before enacting.
The current emotional kneejerk by Congress to punish the recipients of the bonuses attempts to do damage to at least 3 separate contracts:
1. The contract between AIG and the employees who did whatever they did for the bonus.
2. Any agreement reached between AIG and the government officials that put the deal together.
3. The bail out the Congressmen put into law in the performance of their employment contract with their constituents.
24 posted on
03/20/2009 10:21:06 AM PDT by
frog in a pot
(Is there a definition of "domestic enemies" as used in federal oaths, or is that just lip service?)
To: GOP_Lady
I don’t see a lot of learning going on.
To: GOP_Lady
The “Magic Negro” is indeed on the fly, but he ain’t learning anything.
“Magic Negro” Registered Trademark, LA Times
26 posted on
03/20/2009 10:23:50 AM PDT by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: GOP_Lady
Flip Romney—the media’s favorite Republican. Yawn.
28 posted on
03/20/2009 10:27:48 AM PDT by
Antoninus
(So now "change" is defined as "more of the same, but worse"?)
To: GOP_Lady
That Obama is "learning on the fly" is similar to Mitt's joke during the Republican debates that it would be disastrous to have Hilary as an "intern" in the White house.
Hillary Clinton wants to run the largest enterprise in the world. She hasnt run a corner store. She hasnt run a state. She hasnt run a city, Romney says in the spot. She has never run anything. And the idea that she could learn to be President as an internship just doesnt make any sense.
I wonder how long till the rest of America realizes that Emperor Obama has no clothes
49 posted on
03/20/2009 1:27:11 PM PDT by
Rameumptom
(Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
To: GOP_Lady
Romney is like a Department Manager who learns his division is going to be eliminated. So he applies for CEO of another company before his current place of employment fires him.
At the job interview, Romney inflates his resume and over exaggerates about his accomplishments. The Human Resource lady listening to him, rolls her eyes and thinks to herself, Does this guy believe half the things he says? A few weeks later, Romney receives the rejection letter. He then screams anti-Mormon bias.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson