Obama Requires YOU to SERVE, H.R.1388, "The Give Act" to reform the National Service Laws

The Library of Congress THOMAS ^ | March 14, 2009 | joygrace

[joygrace]

HR 1388, will hit the House floor on Tuesday.It is called the Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act (The Give Act.) The House is scheduled to Rule this week. Sponsored by Democrat Representative Carolyn McCarthy (NY), Education and Labor Committee. The objective is to reauthorize and reform the national service laws.

Democrat Rep. McCarthy is sponsoring the bill with 25 co-sponsors, ALL Democrats, including Charlie Rangel. Need I say more.

[DirtyHarryY2K]

This sort of BS calls for massive armed rebellion!

[joygrace]

The Second American Revolution is fast approaching.

Count me in. They need to hear us, they need to see us, they need to LISTEN!

[NTHockey]

Ah, but is his Master the same as yours and mine?

[HollyB]

It is not Charity or Volunteering if one is forced. Our country was not founded on this mentality, in fact, there is a law in place sating specifically against forced service.

They are talking about every single person serving, including retired baby boomers, and probably older. They are referring to elementary school children serving. Therefore, there could be a law in place forcing a 5 year old to volunteer, service, work for free, or whatever you would like to call it.

I think it’s really bad.

[DirtyHarryY2K]

Get a load of this..

[DCPatriot]

The conservatives seem to think they might be able to vote themselves out of this, maybe, maybe not. We’ll see what voting in America is like in 2012.

You mean 2010.

Obama is not the king. He's the POTUS.

IMO, we're going to see repeat of 1994, the Contract with America redux for the mid-term elections. Obama will be castrated...metaphorically speaking [sadly].

Of course this hinges on there actually being a USA in November 2010. ;^(

[joygrace]

I’m with you my friend..Million Man March on DC for starters. I’ve been saying this for months now but no one seems to want to get it organized. We conservatives better learn to get off our asses and hit the streets soon.

I am with you too. We have a few hundred people on this thread who seem fired up too. Who knows anything is possible.

[rodguy911]

GReat link,we have an unending reminder just 100 miles from my home. It's called Cuba. The stores that come out of there,and make no mistake the ending to socialism is called “communism’ is dictatorship at its finest hour. Just ask the castro brothers or hugo,its served them well.

[joygrace]

"There is some crazy stuff in this bill...snip...

“(5) The effect on the Nation, on those who serve, and on the families of those who serve, if all individuals in the United States were expected to perform national service or were required to perform a certain amount of national service.”

Exactly. It is almost unreal. I want to highlight this Section in the Bill you noted above. It has very strong UN-Democratic language..."were expected to perform,"... Could you please provide me with a reference Section where you found this? Thank you so much.

[MeekOneGOP]

Mornin’! :^D

Oh! Yer lucky day!

You got post #666

:)

666 posted on Sunday, March 15, 2009 1:53:09 AM by dixiechick2000 (”Most Effective Obama Critics: Charles Dow and Edward Jones” ~ John McCormack ~ The Weekly Standard)

[anglian]

Friday, March 13, 2009
Obama’s “Civilian National Security Force” resurfaces
A day ago, at the dedication ceremony of the National Defense University’s Abraham Lincoln Hall, President Obama expressed a renewed need for a civilian national security force. http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2009/03/red-alert-obamas-civilian-national.html On Febuary 16, I noted a little-publicized Department of Defense Directive (Number 1404.10), which establishes a “DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce” and rescinds a prior (and longstanding) directive dealing with the emergency use of civilian personnel.

The new 1404.10 cancels the prior directive of the same designation (”Emergency-Essential (E-E) DoD U.S. Citizen Civilian Employees”), which was issued in 1992 under President Clinton. The 1992 directive specifically deals with overseas deployments of civilian personnel. It does not mention terms like “restoration of order” or “stability operations”, prominently featured in the new directive.

In fact, those functions are central to the mission of President Obama’s new DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce. The 1992 directive mentions the term “overseas” no fewer than 33 times. The 2009 directive does not mention the term “overseas” in the body of the directive even once.
http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/140410p.pdf

[anglian]

666 was also the Chicago lottery # the day 0bama won nomination.

[joygrace]

I looked too and couldn’t find it. I’d love to know too if that is ok. I need some inspiration. The movie sounds like just what I need.

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

Linky no worky.

Odd. Worked yesterday. Browser must have cached the web page.

Anyway, you can still get the bill to come up if you click on my link in post #34, then at the top of the page click on "Bills, Resolutions >" then enter HR 1388 in the search box and hit Enter. The link to the bill will be the first search result.

[MeekOneGOP]

If I had time, I might photoshop 0b0z0's face on this one. :)

http://www.zbrushcentral.com/zbc/attachment.php?attachmentid=16767

[joygrace]

Ooops. Sorry, I didn’t see this post. Thanks for the link.

[HollyB]

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?
c111:1:./temp/~c111RTanLT:e320862:

TITLE VI—CONGRESSIONAL COMMISSION ON CIVIC SERVICE

6104: Duties , Section b , 5

[freekitty]

Thanks

[HollyB]

Use both lines of the link, ok?

[Piquaboy]

That will be an indoctrination camp I suppose.