Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Specter on Eric Holder
my email | 3-12-09 | Arlen Specter

Posted on 03/12/2009 10:10:45 PM PDT by malkee

Dear (redacted):

Thank you for contacting my office concerning the confirmation of Eric H. Holder. I appreciate your interest in this important matter and your opinion.

The confirmation of an Attorney General is one of my most important responsibilities as a United States Senator. Next to the President, there is no federal official more important than the Attorney General to ensuring that the rule of law is enforced. Attorneys General are trusted with incredible responsibility and, in our justice system, they often have the final say on critical legal issues. As a result, I take the Senate's constitutional role in the confirmation process very seriously. I examine each and every nominee thoroughly and make an independent judgment as to whether he or she is qualified to assume the position of Attorney General. I conduct the same thorough review regardless of the political party of the President who nominates these candidates for confirmation.

A critical component of the confirmation process is the Senate hearing, where Senators are provided an opportunity to question the nominees and determine their fitness for the positions to which they are nominated. Prior to Mr. Holder's hearing, several concerns had been raised about his role in the Clinton Administration and, as a result, he needed to answer some tough questions. I think it was important that Mr. Holder was willing to admit candidly his mistake on the Marc Rich pardon. It also was important for him to explain why he recommended releasing 16 FALN terrorists from jail and why he did not believe appointment of an independent counsel to investigate Vice President Gore was warranted. While I still had some concerns about these issues, my concerns were ameliorated by the recommendations of several key individuals who also were critical of Mr. Holder on these matters but still firmly supported his nomination to be Attorney General, individuals such as former FBI Director Louis Freeh and former Deputy Attorney General James Comey. Director Freeh called the Rich pardon a "corrupt act," but explained that the corrupt act was not Mr. Holder's. Director Freeh also strongly disagreed with Mr. Holder's decision to recommend the release of the FALN terrorists and not to appoint an independent counsel; however, Director Freeh still endorsed Mr. Holder's nomination. At his hearing, Director Freeh said Mr. Holder had "tremendous integrity," "great character," and "good judgment."

Given these recommendations, I believe Mr. Holder deserves the benefit of the doubt. I voted in favor of Mr. Holder's nomination based on these strong recommendations, his lengthy record of public service, and my desire to allow the President to put his team into place. President Obama is facing enormous problems, and to the extent there can be cooperation consistent with my responsibilities and the Senate's role in our system of checks and balances, I intend to cooperate with President Obama. In addition, given the importance of the Justice Department's mission, I will continue working to ensure that its leadership positions are filled in a fair but timely manner.

Thank you again for writing regarding the confirmation of the Attorney General. The concerns of my constituents are of great importance to me, and I rely on you and other Pennsylvanians to inform me of your views. Should you have any questions on this issue or any other issue, please do not hesitate to contact my office or visit my website at http://specter.senate.gov.

Sincerely,

Arlen Specter


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: arlenspecter; chat; email; ericholder; pennarino; senatorsphincter; snarlinarlen; specter; spectertruthfile; sphincter; unverifiable
Since the first letter from Arlen Specter was such a hit, I decided to post another I received in response to a complaint I filed about his vote to confirm Eric Holder as Attorney General
1 posted on 03/12/2009 10:10:45 PM PDT by malkee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

ping


2 posted on 03/12/2009 10:11:14 PM PDT by malkee (Actually I'm an ex-smoker--two and a half years-- But I think about it every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malkee

Well...at least was “concerned”.....i hate speak like that...so wimpy.


3 posted on 03/12/2009 10:13:48 PM PDT by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chasio649

ooops..at least HE was concerned.


4 posted on 03/12/2009 10:14:40 PM PDT by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: malkee

I guess if you are candid these days, you can get away with anything.


5 posted on 03/12/2009 10:15:54 PM PDT by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malkee

16 FALN terrorists from jail “good judgment.” ?


6 posted on 03/12/2009 10:19:55 PM PDT by razorback-bert (Will trade sex for ammo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malkee

Well ... see ... I have good judgement, but a couple of other guys said that maybe I didn’t ... so I listened to them, and agreed to do what they told me to do.


7 posted on 03/12/2009 10:23:08 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malkee

This should have been titled: “Specter Goes Down on Eric Holder”


8 posted on 03/12/2009 10:31:02 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malkee
Photobucket
9 posted on 03/12/2009 10:42:47 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malkee

yeah, and he probably consulted Scottish Law before deciding that Eric Holder was ethical enough to be the AG.


10 posted on 03/13/2009 1:25:31 AM PDT by bpjam (Tell your Rep/Senator to Google: Marjorie Mezvinsky. Yes, it IS a threat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malkee
The concerns of my constituents are of great importance to me,...

Interpretation: "Thank you for your concern, but I'll do what I damn well please."

11 posted on 03/13/2009 1:52:54 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (I'll miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malkee
Blah, blah...stuff...blah, blah...more stupid crap...blah, blah...I am a traitor RINO.

Go off and die somewhere Spincter.

12 posted on 03/13/2009 2:26:38 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (An Oath is Forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malkee
The only thing I want to hear from Sphincter is his concession speech after the next republican primary.
13 posted on 03/13/2009 3:17:27 AM PDT by Nateman (Until I see some ID he is PRES_ENT Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
Plan on voting in the republican primary but I don't believe Specter will be in it. He's too crusty and crafty to realize he would be toast against Toomey in a primary of just republican voters. He'll switch parties and take Toomey on in the general where he can draw on the fraudulent votes of Philadelphia ACORN crowd, militant black panthers, and the graveyards to carry him over the top, all with the blessing of fast eddie. It truly is a sad state of affairs here in the Keystone State.
14 posted on 03/13/2009 3:59:25 AM PDT by RU88 (The false messiah can not change water into wine any more than he can get unity from diversity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

The concerns of my constituents are of great importance to me,...

Specter to constituents: DROP DEAD!


15 posted on 03/13/2009 4:00:39 AM PDT by RU88 (The false messiah can not change water into wine any more than he can get unity from diversity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: malkee

In other words, I don’t give a rat’s behind what you people out there think, I’ll do as I please.

Unfortunately, that is the prevailing attitude in Versailles on the Potomac. The roalty doesn’t have to listen to the people because.. they don’t have to! THEY are the rulers; WE are the serfs.

Two hundred and thirty-four years ago, a small group of patriots risked all to rid us of tyranny and royalty. Eoday, their efforts were in vain. Once again, we are ruled by tyranny and royalty.


16 posted on 03/13/2009 4:31:22 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malkee

Two words: Brain Damage


17 posted on 03/13/2009 6:37:15 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Barter Now! (Starve our socialist government))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson