And spamming with the same attacks on multiple threads...
Posted on 02/24/2009 10:13:48 PM PST by Carling
Vanity post, yes, but I have to wonder about the sound breaks in Bobby Jindal's rebuttal talk tonight and why they were there. I've never seen this before in years of watching these things, and it seemed almost deliberate. Does anybody know which network controlled the pool feed tonight on Jindal's response?
I guess we’ll just have to see won’t we? I for one, am not going to throw anyone over the side because they don’t happen to mesmerize an audience during one speech. If we TRULY want someone of substance to be our next President, then we’d better not dismiss someone who is soft-spoken, or spends time talking about issues, instead of fluff. Isn’t that why we fault the Democrats and brain-dead voters, for choosing their candidate like they’re voting for the ‘American Idol’ finalist?
bttt
///// #PPPPPPP
DTG 242118Z FEB 09
T O P S E C R E T VIKINGKITTEN
SUBJ: BLOGPIMP
RE: POST 40
1. PERIMETER SENSORS ALERTED OF SUSPECTED TROLL PRESENCE, THIS DTG, THIS LOCATION.
2. EVIDENCE OF BLOG PIMPING ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT REPEAT EVIDENCE OF BLOG PIMPING ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.
3. WATCH NCOIC IS DECLARING CODE VICTOR-KILO AND RECOMMENDING LEVEL TWO SURVEILL NOOB IN FREEP FORUM (S.N.I.F.F.), WITH ADDED PRECAUTIONS FOR PATHETIC INTERNET MULTIPLE PINGS (P.I.M.P).
4. ALL ELEMENTS ARE DIRECTED TO REPORT CONFIRM/DENY TO FREEPNORAD AS AVAILABLE. WATCH NCOIC WILL COORDINATE COMMS WITH FR MOD COMMAND BUNKER.
5. ADMIN NOTE: INTERESTED PARTIES MAY BE INCLUDED IN, OR REMOVED FROM, THE VIKING KITTIES TROLL-WATCH ALERT ROSTER BY FREEPMAILING THE WATCH NCOIC, CODENAME “OLD SARGE”, SUBJECT: ALERT ROSTER.
6. CHALLENGE/PASSWORD: BEEBER-SHOWER.
#/////
NOTHING FOLLOWS
EOM EOM EOM
Please don’t spam the threads. Thanks.
You do know that once the media-created sheen wears off of Zero and he is exposed for the bumbling, socialistic, clueless imbicile that he really is, his poll numbers will likely be preceded with a negative sign, right?
I was listening to Fox News when Obama and Jindahl spoke, and I found the breaks in the sound irritating, as well.
I made it a point not to watch, but to listen only, because I wanted to hear content without being influenced by backdrop and the swooning crowd for Obama’s speech. As Brit Hume said, the person who gives the response is always at a disadvantage because of the setting. Obama, say what you will about him, delivers a good speech (as Rush says, Obama can say nothing better than anyone else). By just listening to them, the contradictions in Obama’s speech were somehow even more apparent than if I had been watching.
As for Jindahl, the thing that struck me immediately was that he was using too much expression, almost like he was reading a bedtime story to a little kid. But for actual content, I think he was right on. The problem is that there is no comparison between his delivery and Obama’s delivery. Obama has it all over Jindahl, and the talking heads were quick to jump on that and pan Jindahl.
IBTZ.
It is a totally different experience to speak to a live crowd than it is to tape a speech. There is no crowd feed back and would probably seem very uncomfortable to someone who isn’t a skilled performer.
and this morning c-span had trouble with the feed for Bill Bennet
and Qwest communications who set up the RNC convention had trouble with the audio there too. (did we mention qwest is a major democrat donor and the founder is pro-homosexual supporter?)
that said sometimes incompetence is just incompetence.
welll at least he is not a Mavericky Maverick who have spent his maverick career being a maverick and a bold maverick of his party, did we mention maverick?
You joined FR just to spam it with two different posts in one thread?
That’s a new technique.
Wonder if he was purposely bad in order to get some media coverage. Had he been great, the media would have ignored him. This way, everyone around the water cooler is saying, “Who’s Jindal?” Then of course they go to YouTube or Google and they start seeing the ‘real’ Jindal.
Although I didn’t watch any of this last night.
Spamgasm.
>>That’s a new technique.<<
you know, it does kind of feel like we are getting a lesser quality of troll these days... :(
No creativity to speak of.
Agreed, the quality of the recent trolls has declined to the point of ‘Meh’ when responding to them in jest.
There’s no fun in tormenting them as there is no challenge in it at the moment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.