Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OKC officer pulls man over for anti-Obama sign on vehicle
NewsOK ^ | 2/19/09

Posted on 02/19/2009 7:25:45 AM PST by peggybac

An Oklahoma City police officer wrongly pulled over a man last week and confiscated an anti-President Barack Obama sign the man had on his vehicle.

The officer misinterpreted the sign as threatening, said Capt. Steve McCool, of the Oklahoma City Police Department, and took the sign, which read "Abort Obama, not the unborn."

Chip Harrison said he was driving to work when a police car followed him for several miles and then signaled for him to pull over.

''I pulled over, knowing I hadn't done anything wrong," Harrison said in a recent phone interview.

When the officer asked Harrison if he knew why he had been pulled over, Harrison said he did not.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsok.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: abortobama; bho2009; censorship; digg; donutwatch; fear; firstamendment; freedomofspeech; gaystapo; jbt; leo; lp; lping; obama; obamabrownshirts; obamanoia; pc; police; policestate; prolife; searchwarrant; secretservice; sign; ss; thoughtpolice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 361-363 next last
To: mnehrling

I don’t care how “professional” they are. I would not allow a “walk through” of my house without a warrant, and any request to speak to me would be responded to with the phone number of my attorney.


81 posted on 02/19/2009 7:58:17 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (We used to institutionalize the insane. Now we elect them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: IndianPrincessOK

Thought you might like to see this thread.


82 posted on 02/19/2009 7:58:51 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Could just be ‘thinking while conservative’...wait, that is redundant..


83 posted on 02/19/2009 7:59:01 AM PST by LearnsFromMistakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Wil H
Well, at least the police officer confirmed that the left do actually agree that abortion is murder.

Your assumption could be wrong. The officer may have been very far to the right and truly knows what abortion is.

The incompatibility of the left and right becomes apparent when a word has a definite meaning.

84 posted on 02/19/2009 7:59:08 AM PST by whodathunkit (Shrugging as I leave for the Gulch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Popman
‘’When I was on my way there, the Secret Service called me and said they weren't going to ransack my house or anything ... they just wanted to (walk through the house) and make sure I wasn't a part of any hate groups.”

And, I wonder how they would make that determination?

With all due respect to our truly dedicated law enforcement officers - never consent to a search of your person or property without a warrant.

85 posted on 02/19/2009 8:00:01 AM PST by Never on my watch (Save energy - put the enemy's lights out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: whodathunkit

Probably nothing good...(chuckle)


86 posted on 02/19/2009 8:00:06 AM PST by Badeye (There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman

“They should not have been called in the first place.
But they were ... and they responded appropriately.”

I think the Secret Service did go overboard. The evidence against Harrison was the bumper sticker. The Secret Service told the OKC cops they did not consider it a threat. Therefore, they had no justification to visit the “offender” (other than to apologize on behalf of fellow law enforcement officers) and they had absolutely no valid reason to ask to inspect the home since the sticker wasn’t considered threatening. (BTW, I do have a lot of respect for the SS. I just hope Obama does too. The SS might be over-reacting right now because they don’t know where they stand with this administration.)


87 posted on 02/19/2009 8:00:30 AM PST by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

Hmmm .... seems like if this goes to trial, it could actually hurt his pro-life cause. If the court determines that “abort” does not mean “kill” the pro-choicers could use that as more fire against pro-life ... if it’s not killing, then there’s no problem.

Maybe I’m thinking a bit extreme here, but nothing the pro-choice side does surprises me anymore.


88 posted on 02/19/2009 8:01:03 AM PST by al_c (Avoid the consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
I wonder if he had a firearm visible, he would probably be in jail and his house burned for good measure.

I had actually pictured what would happen to me in the same situation....finding guns and ammo in the house. Bet I'd be in jail!

89 posted on 02/19/2009 8:01:20 AM PST by CAluvdubya (Please let me know if you want on or off the San Diego ping list. Let's get the ball rollin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
They are required to respond to every call they receive.

So you are telling me that if I (and a hundred of my friends) called up the Secret Service during the Bush administration, and complained to them about every disparaging remark we heard from a Lefty that might sound vaguely threatening, they would have paid a personal visit to each Lefty's house? I don't think so.

90 posted on 02/19/2009 8:01:39 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (We used to institutionalize the insane. Now we elect them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: MrB

gee let me guess . he was not white !


91 posted on 02/19/2009 8:01:44 AM PST by ncalburt (Read all about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: PubliusMM; Libertina; Just Lori
Who defines “hate group”? And, then, who interprets the definition?

And how long will it be before Free Republic is redefined as a 'hate group'?

Of the threads here that discuss The Anointed One, I would hazard a guess that the percentage of anti-Barry threads number 'close' to 100%. 

I am Blessed to know of a particularly wonderful Freeper Lady who has a FREEPR customized license plate on her stylish and fashionable car.   Will she soon be in danger of being pulled over and harassed for advertising the fact that she is a proud member of a 'hate group'?

Joe Stalin's ghost walks among us.

92 posted on 02/19/2009 8:02:19 AM PST by Stoat (Palin / Coulter 2012: A Strong America Through Unapologetic Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: peggybac
"You've got an officer who had a different thought on what the word 'abort' meant."

You've got an officer who needs basic instruction in the English language.

93 posted on 02/19/2009 8:02:51 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgc1122

“the situation was made right in the end.”

NOT!! I’m scared!


94 posted on 02/19/2009 8:03:11 AM PST by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TurtleUp

You could make rolling paper out of it if you’re so inclined.


95 posted on 02/19/2009 8:03:30 AM PST by Califreak (1/20/13-Sunrise in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

The reader comments on this are a scream.


96 posted on 02/19/2009 8:04:18 AM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

change


97 posted on 02/19/2009 8:04:18 AM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peggybac

I am sure the ACLU will be right there to help the guy with the rights violation issues.... /s


98 posted on 02/19/2009 8:05:15 AM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Yep, but probably just once to determine if your friend was a threat.


99 posted on 02/19/2009 8:05:16 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: peggybac
But his run-in with the law wasn't over yet. ''The Secret Service called and said they were at my house," Harrison said...''When I was on my way there, the Secret Service called me and said they weren't going to ransack my house or anything ... they just wanted to (walk through the house) and make sure I wasn't a part of any hate groups."

"Vee just vant to make sure your papers are in order!"

Javol!

Intimidation.
The SS had no right to enter the man's home without a search warrant.
No self-respecting judge would have given them one.
Too bad the guy didn't make them produce one before letting them in
on their fishing expedition for evidence that he was part of a "hate group."
Glad things turned out okay though.

100 posted on 02/19/2009 8:05:18 AM PST by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 361-363 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson