Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Lautenberg Predicts No one 'Will Have the Chance' to Read Final Stimulus Bill Before Vote
cnsnews.com ^ | Friday, February 13, 2009 | Ryan Byrnes and Edwin Mora

Posted on 02/13/2009 11:25:48 AM PST by Joiseydude

(CNSNews.com) – Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) predicted on Thursday that none of his Senate colleagues would "have the chance" to read the entire final version of the $790-billion stimulus bill before the bill comes up for a final vote in Congress.

“No, I don’t think anyone will have the chance to [read the entire bill],” Lautenberg told CNSNews.com.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; antiamericans; bho2009; bhostimulus; congress; corruption; crime; criminal; democratcongress; democrats; economy; fraud; howtostealacountry; neomarxism; obama; pelosi; porkulus; sorocrats; stealing; stimulus; thieves; unpatriotic; vietcongress
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
SO, how the hell do they know what they are voting for?
1 posted on 02/13/2009 11:25:48 AM PST by Joiseydude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude
For the first time in my adult life, I am really AFRAID FOR MY COUNTRY!
2 posted on 02/13/2009 11:27:16 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (Join the Constitution Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

Then they better do something about it and quick, like do not vote.


3 posted on 02/13/2009 11:27:19 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude
"No, I don’t think anyone will have the chance to [read the entire bill],"

Then don't vote on it... duh...

Sad that common sense so easily eludes our nation's legislators.
4 posted on 02/13/2009 11:30:35 AM PST by Sopater (I'm so sick of atheists shoving their religion in my face.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

Well then what do we need “representatives” for? If everyone who votes, doesn’t need to read and understand everything they vote on, we the people could do that, we don’t need a middleman.


5 posted on 02/13/2009 11:33:13 AM PST by mrsmel (Put the Gitmo terrorists near Capitol Hill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude
“Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) predicted on Thursday that none of his Senate colleagues would “have the chance” to read the entire final version of the $790-billion stimulus bill before the bill comes up for a final vote in Congress.”

Ya’ think???? Thank you Captain Obvious. Then how ‘bout you don't VOTE for it until you've had time to read the fine print — isn't that what you're whipping up on all the people who signed for mortgages they couldn't afford and a credit they couldn't maintain? DO YOU THINK YOU MIGHT TAKE A LESSON — NOT FROM ANCIENT HISTORY, EINSTEIN, BUT FROM TWO MONTHS AGO!!!!!!!!

Do you think you might have enough brain cells still firing to form the word, “No,” and not just “no,” but “Hell, no!!!” Of course not...their all as dumb as they look and corrupt as we think.

6 posted on 02/13/2009 11:33:20 AM PST by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

I was venting — that’s, “They’re are all as dumb as they look...”


7 posted on 02/13/2009 11:34:57 AM PST by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

They could place the telephone book into the record and these idiots would stand up and vote for it.


8 posted on 02/13/2009 11:38:22 AM PST by Deo volente (High Noon, January 20, 2009: Our long national nightmare begins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

I doubt anyone would have read it even if they did have a chance. To paraphrase Obama: “When was the last time a bill got passed where anyone actually read what they were voting for?”


9 posted on 02/13/2009 11:41:10 AM PST by Maceman (If you're not getting a tax cut, you're getting a pay cut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

Here we are told that we overreached on our credit cards because we didn’t read the fine print, our interest rate went up because we didn’t read the fine print, our car loans were unaffordable because we didn’t read the fine print we are in so much trouble financially cause we didn’t read the fine print...I guess these guys are just typical American citizens. They’re just one of us:) (sarc.)


10 posted on 02/13/2009 11:46:26 AM PST by lucky american (We cannot direct the wind but we can adjust the sails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Maybe they could pass a Stimulus Plan that gives a guy named Tim in Wilmington NC $200 Billion and not even read it.


11 posted on 02/13/2009 11:59:37 AM PST by Holicheese (Big Papi is healthy again! Watch out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese

LOL Got a lady here in Houston that would like that too.

Now that we know all about Snowe and Collin’s drug family problems; it’s out in the open; so maybe they should reconsider and not vote for the stimulis package.


12 posted on 02/13/2009 12:02:48 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

How is it possible that the rules to have the full bill read before the vote be avoided? I thought the Senate rules were that if a single senator asked to have it read, it must be read.

Has the senate altered its rules? Who is holding a gun to the head of all the senators so nobody requests the reading?

Somebody tell me truthfully that the procedures have not altered so much in recent years? Please.


13 posted on 02/13/2009 12:04:08 PM PST by Avoiding_Sulla (Yesterday's Left = today's status quo. Thus "CONSERVATIVE": a conflicted label for battling tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Snowe and Collins both like to hit the Maine homegrown bud.
I heard that they sell it to Teddy kennedy to help him with his brain pain!


14 posted on 02/13/2009 12:07:18 PM PST by Holicheese (Big Papi is healthy again! Watch out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

I don’t know how any dimwit, even a democrat, could vote for a bill that they don’t know what’s in it


15 posted on 02/13/2009 12:10:31 PM PST by longhorn too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
-- I thought the Senate rules were that if a single senator asked to have it read, it must be read. --

Basically so. At some point the leader will proffer a unanimous consent request that includes waiving the reading. Absent objection, the reading is waived.

I have seen only one bill of any length read from the floor, and maybe 10 short ones (paragraph or so), in about 2 years of watching daily. The procedures haven't changed.

16 posted on 02/13/2009 12:11:05 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

What is the vote requirement for passage in the Senate?


17 posted on 02/13/2009 12:20:57 PM PST by Gill (Gill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

For Democrats stimulus bills are like sausages, you probably don’t want to know what goes into them before you have to partake of them.


18 posted on 02/13/2009 12:23:45 PM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

19 posted on 02/13/2009 12:28:45 PM PST by AwesomePossum ("The superior man is modest in his speech, but exceeds in his actions." Confucius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gill
-- What is the vote requirement for passage in the Senate? --

It takes unanimous consent to agree to take the vote, and if unanimity doesn't exist (if there is one objector), then it takes 60 to get around the objection and set a time to take the vote.

Waiving a statutory point of order takes 60 votes. E.g., the bill is off budget.

Passage is a majority of those voting.

It is not uncommon for the senate to agree to combine one of the inevitable 60 vote hurdles with a vote on final passage, and just agree that it takes 60 votes to obtain final passage. IOW, take one vote at a 60 hurdle, instead of one at 60 and one at majority.

Passage of treaties takes 2/3rds, per the constitution.

20 posted on 02/13/2009 12:31:27 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson