Skip to comments.
Vehicle Scrappage Bill Introduced in Both US Senate and House (Cash for Clunkers)
www.greencarcongress.com ^
| 1-14-2009
| Staff
Posted on 01/15/2009 5:32:50 AM PST by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: sully777; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; muleskinner; sausageseller; ...
Rest In Peace, old friend, your work is finished.....
If you want ON or OFF the DIESEL KnOcK LIST just FReepmail me.....
This is a fairly HIGH VOLUME ping list on some days.....
2
posted on
01/15/2009 5:33:27 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(I was sad because I had no shoes to throw, until I met a reporter who had no feet.....)
To: Red Badger
So, I buy an old clunker for $1000, trade it in and get $4500?..............We gonna be sooooo rich!................
3
posted on
01/15/2009 5:34:40 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(I was sad because I had no shoes to throw, until I met a reporter who had no feet.....)
To: Red Badger
Great. More welfare for the automakers. Is this a great country, or what?
4
posted on
01/15/2009 5:34:50 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: Red Badger
Hmmmm ... could this lead to a bounty on useless old
hags congress vermin who are running the country into the ground?
What would I be able to get on, say EBay, for the ears of one of these mentioned?
Any bidders out here?
5
posted on
01/15/2009 5:38:22 AM PST
by
G.Mason
(If you surrender your right to own a gun, you surrender your right to your life)
To: Red Badger
So, I buy an old clunker for $1000, trade it in and get $4500?..............We gonna be sooooo rich!................It ain't cash brother. It's the new money called govt. scrip. Only govt. approved dealers will be able to give you credit. Otherwise it's just a piece of paper with Pelosi's pic on it.
6
posted on
01/15/2009 5:38:50 AM PST
by
raybbr
(It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
To: Red Badger
Dang!
They’ve got to be in driveable condition!
Somehow I just knew I would not be able to get away with the plan that was forming in my head...
7
posted on
01/15/2009 5:39:16 AM PST
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
To: Red Badger
>> So, I buy an old clunker for $1000, trade it in and get $4500?
It’s gonna be fun to see the “law of unintended consequences” operate on this one!
I predict:
* New car prices will rise by, oh, let’s say, $4500...
* The unbroken caravan of used cars down I-35 to Mexico will slow... then stop... then reverse...
&etc
8
posted on
01/15/2009 5:39:32 AM PST
by
Nervous Tick
(I've left Cynical City... bound for Jaded.)
To: G.Mason
...for the ears of one of these mentioned? Any bidders out here?Just losing their ears don't get 'em out of office. You gotta think of something more... permanent.
9
posted on
01/15/2009 5:40:07 AM PST
by
raybbr
(It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
To: Wolfie
More welfare for the automakers.In a way, yes. However, it is a far larger welfare program for the rubes who voted for Obama.
10
posted on
01/15/2009 5:40:16 AM PST
by
Erik Latranyi
(Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
To: Red Badger
Time to go buy a junker to sell to the government.
11
posted on
01/15/2009 5:41:25 AM PST
by
The_Victor
(If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
To: Red Badger
It seems the devil is in the details. I’ll bet that any vehicle class other than Prius-wannabees are struggling just to meet the CAFE standard for that class. So I want to trade in my 3/4 ton that gets 12 mpg for a newer 3/4 ton. Theones I have looked at all rate around 13 mpg. So to qualify I would have to get one that does 16 or 17 mpg? Maybe if I traded down to a 4 cylinder.
To: Nervous Tick
I have a ‘95 Jetta that gets 32mpg. How can I upgrade from there? The new Jetta’s only get 35mpg, I think.
13
posted on
01/15/2009 5:42:15 AM PST
by
raybbr
(It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
To: Red Badger
My thoughts almost. I drive a ‘85 3/4 ton Dodge van I gave $500 for 2 years ago.
14
posted on
01/15/2009 5:43:35 AM PST
by
Kadric
To: Red Badger
I'll don my tin foil hat and say this more to do with tracking you via chips and satellite than it has to do with the environment. This is like telling us that red light cameras are for public safety.
15
posted on
01/15/2009 5:43:43 AM PST
by
4yearlurker
(Independence! The Federal Constitution,may it never fail. (~Caleb Earle -1811.))
To: Red Badger
“While participation in the voluntary program is hard to gauge”
It’s not hard for me to gauge. It is NOT financially feasible for me to purchase a new vehicle given the present economy and the overwhelming corruption and stupidity of Congress.
I’ll keep the “clunker.”
(So what will Congress do then? Force the banks to lend money to all of us who cannot afford a new vehicle? [sarc])
16
posted on
01/15/2009 5:44:17 AM PST
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
To: raybbr
I was thinking more on the line of the bounty on Coyotes, in days past.
Of course, that was only one ear, but it was a foregone conclusion that the coyote wouldn't be bothering the flock again.
17
posted on
01/15/2009 5:44:43 AM PST
by
G.Mason
(If you surrender your right to own a gun, you surrender your right to your life)
To: raybbr
“Only govt. approved dealers will be able to give you credit. “
Bailout city.
To: G.Mason
What would I be able to get on, say EBay, for the ears of one of these mentioned?The ears are worthless, they don't use them anyway. You want something valuable, get tongues.
19
posted on
01/15/2009 5:45:27 AM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: Red Badger
None of the people who want everyone to drive hybrids/hydrogen/electric/alternative cars have answered a simple question:
If every vehicle on the road today were to get replaced with "environmentally-friendly" vehicles -- what, exactly, will be done with the 250 million "old" vehicles currently on the road? They have to be put somewhere or disposed of; the cars contain fuels and other fluids that they don't want released into the environment; each one takes up a lot of physical space; re-selling to the third world simply shifts the problem elsewhere; etc.
20
posted on
01/15/2009 5:46:58 AM PST
by
NewJerseyJoe
(Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson