Posted on 12/08/2008 8:50:10 PM PST by Jay777
No. 08A469 Title: Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant v. Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State
Docketed: Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Connecticut Case Nos.: (SC 18264)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nov 25 2008 Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg. Nov 26 2008 Application (08A469) denied by Justice Ginsburg. Nov 29 2008 Application (08A469) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia. Dec 8 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2008. Dec 8 2008 Application (08A469) referred to the Court by Justice Scalia.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~ Attorneys for Petitioner: Cort Wrotnowski 1057 North Street (202) 862-8554 Greenwich, CT 06831 Party name: Cort Wrotnowski Attorneys for Respondent: Richard Blumenthal Attorney General (860) 808-5316 Office of the Attorney General 55 Elm Street P.O. Box 120 Hartford, CT 06141-0120 Party name: Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State
(Excerpt) Read more at origin.www.supremecourtus.gov ...
*****************************EXCERPT*******************************
When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdoms dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.s children.
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.
***************************************
So why did it expire?
Why the media blackout on Obama's citizenship
has the name I was trying to come up with and a possible reason why Obama doesn't want his papers made public....
*********************EXCERPT******************************
By JR Dieckmann
It seems that everyone today is asking why there is no media coverage of the many legal challenges to Obama's eligibility to become president, based upon many valid questions regarding his citizenship. Instead of simply answering these challenges with documented proof of his citizenship, he has chosen instead to conceal from public view, every single legal document he has, and spend a half million dollars in lawyer fees to fight the cases in hopes of getting them dismissed or delayed indefinitely.
The documents he has had sealed that would answer this looming question are his original birth certificate, his passport, his college records from both Columbia and Harvard universities, his health records, and his original Selective Service registration if it exists at all. Many inconsistencies in the Selective Service registration form, which has appeared on the web indicate it has been forged or altered. Obama seems determined to hide his true identity.
Some investigators are even questioning the identity of his paternal father, based on his stronger resemblance to Frank Marshal Davis and Malcolm X than to Barack Obama Sr.
Bwahahahaahaha, your post reminds me of that wheelcahir guy throwing wrenches at the dodgeball recruits!
Here’s your link.
Thanks...taking a break to watch the Lakers BB Game.
And this one
What has our world come to when upholding the Constitution might anger millions of citizens and cause civil unrest.
How do you know that? Have you seen his birth certificate?
Hey! You can’t make this stuff up!
So, Obama released Fukino to state where he was born from teh vault copy. Deos that mean the document has now been rendered ‘public’?
Maybe someone already asked this question, but, if this case is truly nothing and only the lunatic fringe are following it, why would Scalia send this SECOND case up for discussion? I could understand that Thomas may have sent the first case for discussion just to get the whole issue off the table. But, why would Scalia do this for the second case? It seems to me that it must be something other than a nuisance case. And, it must have the support of several of the conservatives. Perhaps the first case did have a flaw, and since this one doesn’t it has a better chance. I really don’t have great knowledge as to how these court cases get set up for discussion. But, can anyone give me a good explanation as to why Scalia would take the action that he did if this is as ridiculous as some say?
Hopefully the BC will become secondary to indictments issued in Chicago.....Now that WOULD be an excuse for him to step down before 1-20....without being embarrassed by his BC ;~)
How can a state official who has previously been restrained from stating the location due to provacy now state a private fact found on the document without the state official opening the private document for verification?
See #67!!!
What Didn't He Know, and When Didn't He Know It?
Obama's unsatisfyingly vague response to the Blagojevich scandal. __Much like his answers on questions regarding private papers!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.