Skip to comments.
Teenager banned from wearing Christian chastity ring at school
Daily Mail ^
| 04th December 2008
| Luke Salkeld
Posted on 12/05/2008 1:29:35 PM PST by forkinsocket
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
.
To: forkinsocket
To: forkinsocket
I don't know why liberals think abstinence until marriage is "dangerous."
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
3
posted on
12/05/2008 1:34:06 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: forkinsocket
Why not just say no at the appropriate time and leave it at a personal level instead of wearing something publicly that one knows will cause controversy?
4
posted on
12/05/2008 1:34:26 PM PST
by
stuartcr
(If the end doesn't justify the means...why have different means?)
To: neverbluffer
Can’t - it’s the nanny state of Englandisbad ... ok for Muslim stuff not ok for Christian stuff ....
5
posted on
12/05/2008 1:35:31 PM PST
by
SkyDancer
("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad, Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
To: forkinsocket
“Yesterday, Mrs Jarrett defended the ban and said: ‘The ring would be extremely dangerous in PE, technology or science lessons. “
6
posted on
12/05/2008 1:36:04 PM PST
by
sionnsar
(Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|RCongressIn2Years)
To: forkinsocket
Potentially dangerous? To whom? The boys in the school?
"We can't have her lowering the boys self esteem like that!"
7
posted on
12/05/2008 1:36:12 PM PST
by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: goldstategop
I don't know why liberals think abstinence until marriage is "dangerous." The strength of their worldview is based on human depravity. Without it, they die.
8
posted on
12/05/2008 1:36:13 PM PST
by
Jibaholic
("Those people who are not ruled by God will be ruled by tyrants." --William Penn)
To: forkinsocket
What a bunch of crappola.
Won’t be long ‘til we see this nonsense here! Just keep importing those Muslims!
9
posted on
12/05/2008 1:37:00 PM PST
by
AuntB
(The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925)
To: forkinsocket
The principal said, and I quote: "'The ring would be extremely dangerous in PE, technology or science lessons."
Pretty simple solution -- wear it on a chain tucked inside your shirt during those classes, or keep it in your pocket, and put it back on your finger afterwards. No big deal.
10
posted on
12/05/2008 1:37:11 PM PST
by
Terabitten
(To all RINOs: You're expendable. Sarah isn't.)
To: stuartcr
Controversy is not always bad. Why would YOU attempt to intimate that it is?
11
posted on
12/05/2008 1:37:12 PM PST
by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: stuartcr
Maybe because you can influence more people if there is some display of your beliefs? Kinda like advertising. You can rely on word of mouth, but a billboard will touch a lot more people.
If all you hear from the people you deal with is “have sex, have sex” finding that there are others who don’t may influence you.
12
posted on
12/05/2008 1:37:41 PM PST
by
Andyman
(The truth shall make you FReep.)
To: forkinsocket
If people can wear head scarves, why can't I wear a ring?Because England is now anti-Christian and pro-Muslim. It seems obvious.
13
posted on
12/05/2008 1:38:18 PM PST
by
dan1123
(Liberals sell it as "speech which is hateful" but it's really "speech I hate".)
To: goldstategop
Cause it plays havoc with Planned Parenthood’s funding requests.
14
posted on
12/05/2008 1:38:26 PM PST
by
lastchance
(Hug your babies.)
To: goldstategop
The libs’ “father” knows that families are dangerous to him.
Families teach their members about the proper relationship with God.
15
posted on
12/05/2008 1:39:10 PM PST
by
MrB
(The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
To: sionnsar
“Yesterday, Mrs Jarrett defended the ban and said: ‘The ring would be extremely dangerous in PE, technology or science lessons. “I graduated high school almost twenty years ago, and we weren't allowed to wear jewelry of any type, even watches, during PE or science lab (like chemistry or physics). I saw a guy lose a finger when his class ring got caught in a basketball net. It's a fairly standard, straightforward precaution.
Much ado about nothing.
16
posted on
12/05/2008 1:39:13 PM PST
by
Terabitten
(To all RINOs: You're expendable. Sarah isn't.)
To: forkinsocket
“If people can wear head scarves, why can’t I wear a ring?”
Smart girl.
17
posted on
12/05/2008 1:39:38 PM PST
by
JenB987
To: Andyman
Well, since I’m not a teenager, I think sex is something personal.
18
posted on
12/05/2008 1:40:12 PM PST
by
stuartcr
(If the end doesn't justify the means...why have different means?)
To: forkinsocket
And how is this ring not freedom of expression?
The whole idea of not letting a teenager wear a chastisty ring is disgusting. Why don’t the thought police go after the people who urinate on Old Glory, which they call their right to freedom of expression?
What this country has become is appalling.
19
posted on
12/05/2008 1:42:37 PM PST
by
quintr
To: stuartcr
"Be a good little sheep and don't offend anyone..."
Sorry, but that kind of attitude sucks.
20
posted on
12/05/2008 1:44:19 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson