To: forkinsocket
Why not just say no at the appropriate time and leave it at a personal level instead of wearing something publicly that one knows will cause controversy?
4 posted on
12/05/2008 1:34:26 PM PST by
stuartcr
(If the end doesn't justify the means...why have different means?)
To: stuartcr
Controversy is not always bad. Why would YOU attempt to intimate that it is?
11 posted on
12/05/2008 1:37:12 PM PST by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: stuartcr
Maybe because you can influence more people if there is some display of your beliefs? Kinda like advertising. You can rely on word of mouth, but a billboard will touch a lot more people.
If all you hear from the people you deal with is “have sex, have sex” finding that there are others who don’t may influence you.
12 posted on
12/05/2008 1:37:41 PM PST by
Andyman
(The truth shall make you FReep.)
To: stuartcr
"Be a good little sheep and don't offend anyone..."
Sorry, but that kind of attitude sucks.
20 posted on
12/05/2008 1:44:19 PM PST by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: stuartcr
Why not just say no at the appropriate time and leave it at a personal level instead of wearing something publicly that one knows will cause controversy? Then they don't get the look at me I'm special attention.
28 posted on
12/05/2008 1:51:34 PM PST by
org.whodat
(Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
To: stuartcr
The point is that there is no reason for this to be controversial. It’s just a stupid ring! Why she wants to wear it is nobodys business.
To: stuartcr
Why not just say no at the appropriate time and leave it at a personal level instead of wearing something publicly that one knows will cause controversy?
Okay, why should people that get married wear a wedding ring? Just tell people your married if they ask.
Why wear a Cross if you are a Christian. Why wear a Star of David of you are a Jew? And on and on.....
32 posted on
12/05/2008 1:58:26 PM PST by
SECURE AMERICA
(Coming to You From the Front Lines of Occupied America)
To: stuartcr
I think she’s trying to communicate a concept. One can do that silently, but one can’t do it imperceptibly.
35 posted on
12/05/2008 2:09:19 PM PST by
Mrs. Don-o
("Make things as simple as possible, but not simpler."--- Einstein)
To: stuartcr
Gays can wear rainbow this and that. Have parades with no inhibitions. Have gay clubs at schools. Or have gay awareness days. All being the more provocative the better.
Meanwhile something very unassuming stirs controversy.
38 posted on
12/05/2008 2:16:51 PM PST by
mountn man
(The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
To: stuartcr
...instead of wearing something publicly that one knows will cause controversy?In today's world I think she demonstrates courage by wearing such a ring and standing up for what's right. The ring serves as a reminder to her and others of her pledge. Since honor is no longer tolerated, many do not want to be reminded that there is such a thing.
To: stuartcr
Why not just say no at the appropriate time and leave it at a personal level instead of wearing something publicly that one knows will cause controversy? Why didn't you just read the article and leave it at a personal level instead of posting a comment publicly that one knows will cause controversy?
49 posted on
12/05/2008 5:19:27 PM PST by
Grizzled Bear
("Does not play well with others.")
To: stuartcr
It’s only a controversy to fools.
51 posted on
12/05/2008 5:21:46 PM PST by
gitmo
(I am the latte-sipping, NYT-reading, Volvo-driving, no-gun-owning, effete, PC, arrogant liberal. -BO)
To: stuartcr
70 posted on
12/06/2008 1:07:58 PM PST by
Skooz
(Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson