Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Birth Certificate Protest at SCOTUS
DCist ^ | 12-5-08

Posted on 12/05/2008 10:18:12 AM PST by STARWISE

Four days ago, Roger Bredow uploaded a video to YouTube beseeching like-minded people to come to Washington, D.C. and stand with him outside the Supreme Court.

"[Barack] Obama was born a dual citizen," Bredow said, "British, and a citizen of the United States, at birth." This, said Bredow, meant that the president-elect could never take the oath of office.

And on Friday, the Supreme Court would read Donofrio v. Wells, a suit brought by a New Jersey poker player against his state elections officer, which laid out the charges in the hopes of nullifying the election.

Today at 8 a.m., they came.

"If I'm going to be honest with you," said Bredow, sporting a floppy American flag hat that he'd promised on YouTube he'd be wearing, "I thought I might be the only person here."

He had flown in from Georgia. The other fifteen to twenty people who cycled in and out of the small protest had traveled shorter distances—southern Pennsylvania, northern Virginia—but they felt they had to do something.

The "dual born citizen" claim is the latest (and maybe strongest) attempt by Obama conspiracy theorists to argue that he can't be president, but most of the people I talked to had questioned Obama's citizenship long before this.

"I first heard about it from Phil Berg's case," said Julie Menge of Williamsburg, Virginia, referring to a case that alleges, among other things, that a 2007 state of Hawaii reproduction of Obama's birth certification is forged, and that Obama's paternal Kenyan step-grandmother Sarah was in the room when he was born.

One protestor claimed that a mysterious Muslim imam blessed Obama's birth in Kenya, and that this fact would eventually be revealed, somehow. (He cited African Press International, a bizarre web site that claims it has, but will not make public, a tape of Michelle Obama ranting about racist media coverage of her husband.)

At 9 a.m., a black minister who would only give his name as Brother Pittman led a prayer circle and a recitation of the pledge of allegiance. Pittman, who lives in Silver Spring, came as a "representative of the Rev. James David Manning," a Harlem preacher who became an Internet legend for a February sermon in which he called Obama a "long-legged mack daddy" who was "born trash."

"I've been shunned by members of my own family," Pittman said. "I tell them, do the research! Go online and look up the facts! This is all about openness and why Barack Obama won't answer questions about who he is."

There's nothing new at all about small, strange protests outside the court, whether or not the justices are at work.

While the Obama protestors were praying, a group of 16 young Christians walked up to the other side of the Court steps, strumming a guitar and lighting candles before holding a pro-life prayer vigil.

Police and tourists looked on and a very small group of journalists grabbed the Obama protestors for interviews. "This story is writing itself," said a Mother Jones reporter as he filmed the prayer circle.

The Supreme Court will announce whether it will actually consider the Obama lawsuit as early as today and as late as Monday.

If (as expected) the Court tosses the suit, Bredow will start challenging Obama's legitimacy based on "foreign money that went into his campaign."

Other protestors said they'd start contacting members of the Electoral College. Steve Brindle, who drove down from Pennsylvania, said he'd called his senators yesterday.

"There aren't a lot of people out here today," said Brindle. "There are a lot of people talking about this back home. Really, everyone's asking questions."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certificate; certifigate; donofrio; donofriovwells; enoughalready; getalife; kenya; notthisshiitagain; obama; obama2008; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; obamatruthsquad; scotus; tinfoil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-248 last
To: 1_Rain_Drop
Big things have small beginnings.

My sentiments exactly. I'd have been there if I'd known about it.

241 posted on 12/06/2008 7:02:41 PM PST by pray4liberty (Always vote for life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: pray4liberty

Great Update on Leo’s web site about Chester Author!
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/


242 posted on 12/06/2008 7:59:32 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

‘it’s safe to say its unlikely the court won’t hear the case.’

Double negative, whichmeans they will hear the case?


243 posted on 12/07/2008 4:04:27 AM PST by nikos1121 (The first black president should be another Jackie Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

I only meant that I would do so if OBAMA proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that he was eligible. It doesn’t look like he is going to do that unless he is forced to by the Supreme Court. What I can’t figure out is why conservatives like David Horowitz cannot grasp the constitutional arguments for this case and would rather brand the people that have raised the issue as nutters and the ‘fringe’. After much thought, it can only mean one or two things. One is that the powers that be in our party want to run someone in the future that may have similar ‘issues’ in their view or two, they are just willing to shred the constitution in favor of domestic tranquility and mob rule. Neither are good enough arguments to abandon our constitution. PERIOD.


244 posted on 12/08/2008 6:05:19 AM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

Well, just as a follow-up, since the SCOTUS dismissed the Obama case without comment today, I most definitely did not get the figurative look in the eye that I wanted.


245 posted on 12/08/2008 8:35:15 AM PST by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

Well, just as a follow-up, since the SCOTUS dismissed the Obama case without comment today, I most definitely did not get the figurative look in the eye that I wanted.


246 posted on 12/08/2008 8:35:21 AM PST by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy

I’m shocked! They didn’t even give a figurative look when they dismissed it?

Does this mean it will continue to be an issue until each one of us gets to personally examine the suspect document and verify it’s not a forgery?


247 posted on 12/08/2008 9:05:36 AM PST by stuartcr (If the end doesn't justify the means...why have different means?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

“Does this mean it will continue to be an issue until each one of us gets to personally examine the suspect document and verify it’s not a forgery?”

#####

I don’t know.

For some I suppose it will always be an issue.

“Each one of us” certainly would not have to do this if the Supremes had done it, or better still, if there was a paperwork regimen in place UPON candidacy application.

An explanation as to why they dismissed the case would have been nice, and for most of us, educational. I’m sure there are very good reasons as to why the SCOTUS is allowed to dismiss cases without explanation, but as EyeGuy and not LegalGuy, I certainly cannot think of one.


248 posted on 12/08/2008 9:25:47 AM PST by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-248 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson