Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EyeGuy

I’m shocked! They didn’t even give a figurative look when they dismissed it?

Does this mean it will continue to be an issue until each one of us gets to personally examine the suspect document and verify it’s not a forgery?


247 posted on 12/08/2008 9:05:36 AM PST by stuartcr (If the end doesn't justify the means...why have different means?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]


To: stuartcr

“Does this mean it will continue to be an issue until each one of us gets to personally examine the suspect document and verify it’s not a forgery?”

#####

I don’t know.

For some I suppose it will always be an issue.

“Each one of us” certainly would not have to do this if the Supremes had done it, or better still, if there was a paperwork regimen in place UPON candidacy application.

An explanation as to why they dismissed the case would have been nice, and for most of us, educational. I’m sure there are very good reasons as to why the SCOTUS is allowed to dismiss cases without explanation, but as EyeGuy and not LegalGuy, I certainly cannot think of one.


248 posted on 12/08/2008 9:25:47 AM PST by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson