Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich says Palin will not be the future GOP leader
The Hill ^

Posted on 11/16/2008 11:40:56 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Gingrich says Palin will not be the future GOP leader By Alexander Bolton Posted: 11/16/08 01:05 PM [ET]

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) is batting down the hype that Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin heads into 2012 as the frontrunner for the GOP presidential nomination.

Palin energized the Republican base after GOP presidential nominee Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) tapped her as his running mate and she has tried to preserve her high public profile since Election Day.

But Gingrich, an architect of the Republican revolution of 1994, took Palin down a notch, asserting that she would not become the party’s leader, as some have predicted.

“I think that she is going to be a significant player,” said Gingrich during an interview on CBS’s “Face the Nation”. “But she’s going to be one of 20 or 30 significant players. She’s not going to be the de facto leader.”

Since the defeat of the GOP ticket, Palin has pursued an aggressive media strategy, scheduling a full slate of interviews to keep her face on television.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alexanderbolton; gingrich; gop; newgop; newt; newtgingrich; palin; sarahpalin; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 361-373 next last
To: joygrace

No they don’t have income taxes and they don’t have state sales tax, you pay for their government.


301 posted on 11/16/2008 5:00:11 PM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
She’s not going to be the de facto leader”

Whatever you say boss.
Umm..New?
What about laying off with the dragging down of Gov Plain,l, and giving cheap talking points to the liberal media?
While about it, no more sleeping with the enemy by making global warming TV ads with Queen Pelosi ok?
Trouble with self centered people like Gingrich is, its always all about them and their ambitions, no matter what damage they do to conservatives or the Republican Party.

302 posted on 11/16/2008 5:02:39 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

let the private sector build it with their own money. Don’t coerce the people to pay for it.


303 posted on 11/16/2008 5:06:02 PM PST by ari-freedom (So this is how Liberty dies... with thunderous applause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
You mean the gerrymandered taxes the oil companies solicited fraudulent breaks for?

I'll need a source for her "supporting the bailout". The only thing I've heard out of her on the subject was her support for her running mate.

She balanced the budget in Alaska and had just gotten started cutting spending when she was picked for the VP spot. Bush 1, Dole, Bush 2, McCain... She's more conservative than the whole lot of 'em put together.

304 posted on 11/16/2008 5:10:49 PM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: TheFourthMagi

You keep telling yourself that.


305 posted on 11/16/2008 5:19:58 PM PST by jaime1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: mylife
That’s an approval poll number, actually vote was 99,145 for 48.7%
306 posted on 11/16/2008 5:22:29 PM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
Four years is a lifetime in politics and it might surprise everyone that the future leader of the GOP may not be even someone who is known. What should concern us is who will lead the conservative movement and that is separate from the GOP.

Bingo!!! However, I expect the shout-down to continue here.

307 posted on 11/16/2008 5:23:58 PM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Well here it is in context so what do you think? http://monkeycrash.com/2008/09/19/transcript-full-palin-hannity-interview/

HANNITY: Who is responsible for these failing institutions, in your view?

PALIN: I think the corruption on Wall Street — that is to blame. And that violation of the public trust. And that contract that should be inherent in corporations who are spending, investing other people’s money — the abuse of that is what has got to stop.

And it’s a matter, too, of some of these CEOs and top management people and shareholders too not holding that management accountable, being addicted to, we call it, OPM — O-P-M, “other people’s money.”

Spending that, investing that, not using the prudence that we expect of them. But here again, government has got to play an appropriate role in the stringent oversight, making sure that those abuses stop.

HANNITY: Well, you know, both you and Senator McCain supported the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. You both opposed the bailout of government intervention as it relates to Lehman or Merrill. But now we read this morning that AIG is going to get some type of government bailout.

Was that the right call?

PALIN: Well, you know, first, Fannie and Freddie, different because quasi-government agencies there where government had to step in because of the adverse impacts all across our nation, especially with homeowners. It’s just too impacting, we had to step in there.

I do not like the idea though of taxpayers being used to bailout these corporations. Today it was AIG, important call there, though, because of the construction bonds and the insurance carrier duties of AIG. But first and foremost, taxpayers cannot be looked to as the bailout, as the solution to the problems on Wall Street.


308 posted on 11/16/2008 5:28:17 PM PST by ari-freedom (So this is how Liberty dies... with thunderous applause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
I do not like the idea though of taxpayers being used to bailout these corporations.

(sarc)Yeah... she's a blatant redistributionist all right...(/sarc)

309 posted on 11/16/2008 5:35:34 PM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
Conservatives, even many libertarians, would think a climate like Alaska's may justify a government expenditure for the health of the citizens in this case. Given the direct approval of a majority of the citizens there is small room for criticism from that quarter.

Progressive liberals-and other fuzzy thinkers- however... well they would say anything.

310 posted on 11/16/2008 5:36:27 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

Newt, NO more Rinos like YOU, do you hear??


311 posted on 11/16/2008 5:45:03 PM PST by CARepublicans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: mylife
'He kicked her to the curb on her deathbed'

It is not surprising that you think this since it is not remarked about much but the first wife was alive as of a month ago. See the reference in her daughter's recent column: “
http://dennisprager.townhall.com/Columnists/JackieGingrichCushman/2008/09/28/trying_to_do_my_best “. Not to say that Newt's behavior was very attractive, but the couple had been separated for two years and negotiating a divorce when Mrs. Gingrich went into the hospital. Newt called and asked to visit and brought a legal pad with points they had to settle for the divorce agreement. Mrs. Gingrich very properly kicked him out. The stories that are told make it seem that she got sick and Newt came to the hospital and surprised her with a divorce subpoena, which is not true.

312 posted on 11/16/2008 5:50:26 PM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Capn Nickerson

Huckabee is running because Romney is. His mission ( like the last time) will be to take Romney OUT

Huckabee has a problem with “Mormons”


313 posted on 11/16/2008 5:52:30 PM PST by CARepublicans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: CARepublicans

Huckabee and romney both have a problem with real conservatives


314 posted on 11/16/2008 5:53:13 PM PST by ari-freedom (So this is how Liberty dies... with thunderous applause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

I was unaware that she is fit and sound.

Still. Newt can go suck an egg.


315 posted on 11/16/2008 5:55:24 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: CARepublicans

I’m in Iowa and I will not support anyone who ran before. Sat. night we see Jindhal.


316 posted on 11/16/2008 5:55:32 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: mylife

There are plenty of points both before and against most of our potential candidates, no point swallowing MSM BS!


317 posted on 11/16/2008 6:01:20 PM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

I agree. Thanks for setting me right on that point


318 posted on 11/16/2008 6:02:49 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Sarah Palin scares the hell out of that good ole’ republicans boys club. GO SARAH GO!!!!!!!!!!


319 posted on 11/16/2008 6:06:06 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
“what do you need an assault weapon for if you are going hunting?”

Depends on what you're hunting.

An armed population is a free population.

The 2nd amendment was not put in the constitution to protect hunting...it's the last great check and balance against a tyrannical government. (I just wanted to throw that in) :)
320 posted on 11/16/2008 6:15:45 PM PST by Stourme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 361-373 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson