Posted on 11/14/2008 12:29:37 PM PST by atlbelle44
https://services.saccourt.com/indexsearchnew/CVFLPRDetail.aspx?Details=CV|2008-80000096|keyes|01/01/2008|12/31/2008|FilingDate|Asc|
http://www.soundinvestments.us/files/final_writ_keyes_v_bowen.pdf
Family legend has it that they ripped it off the “Bradford Accord” (two Great x5 grandfathers signed it.....PA document created by rebellious Germans)
I bet there are some upstanding young Americans born in Cuba too.
He can't kill it.
The Secretary of State of all states, in my opinion, certainly have the required standing to bring the underlying Constitutional issue before the federal courts should the candidate not reply to their request for proof.
If only one Secretary of State from one state can be prodded into action without a writ of mandamus to compel them to act, then the issue could be resolved. If your SOS won't act, consider filing a writ of mandamus. It isn't a difficult petition, although in 27 years of practicing law, I have only filed one.
While he is entertaining us, all those obama people would be running things just as if obie were in office. We might get rid of obama, but his thugs would infiltrate a Biden administration. Even if we dump obama, we don't completely win unless the dems lose.
“THE FAULT HERE LIES WITH THE MSM!!!
They gave a PASS to Obama at EVERY turn, while if McCain or Palin farted into the wind, the MSM was calling for congressional investigations.
The American public has a RIGHT to ALL information (except personal) that would allow them to make informed choices.
Do you SERIOUSLY think that 20% of the GOP voters and a substantial number of conservative DEMS would have voted for Obama if they knew about Wright, Ayers, etc.
AND, if there is any credence to the BC issue?”
I agree and evidence is overwhelming that very many Americans knew nothing about Ayers, Wright, or that there was even a question about Obama’s constitutional requirements being met. Just now they are beginning to learn a little about Ayers and that is being carefully presended as “just nothing”.
NO where in the Const. does it define “natural born.” It is the Congress’ right and duty to define.
That would ot count as it was not in affect in 1961.
IIRC< he added that info to his site +/- 1 day of a Berg filing.
To the lawyers out there - why are they confounding the two questions, e.g. the question of where he was born AND the question of whether he holds citizenship in another country.
“Being a “natural born citizen” of the USA does not prevent one from also being a citizen of another country, as the Supreme Court has already ruled exactly that. The confounding of these two issues separate issues may give cause to dismiss the case without determining his eligibility as a natural born citizen... no?”
It is my understanding that someone running for President can not have dual citizenship. Obama has publicly admitted that he once had Kenyan citizenship. Therefore he would only need to show that his Kenyan citizenship was given up and that he made a “pledge” to the US to be considered a US citizen. If I am wrong about this, I hope to be corrected.
I understand McCain and the Senate resolution completely.
I am speaking of a different article. So please no more about McCain’s status.
But if he was not "natural born" nothing can undo that. He would be ineligible.
Just finished writing each of the SCOTUS Justices....PLEASE do the same this weekend. They must understand the gravity of this situation. We the People must inform them.
This may be a dumb question but this Soundinvestments.us link strikes me as odd. Can we find this suit anywhere in a bona fide court database? Such as http://dockets.justia.com? (I haven’t gone through the 500+ posts in this thread so maybe it’s buried somewhere?)
I don't know if it's relevant, but in CA there is a precedent: they removed someone from the Presidential ballot in the past after determining he was ineligible.
You need to post your rebuttel not to lmo but to drew56.
He smells like a leftover lurker troll who was has been sucking his thumb since the Sore-Loserman loss of Election 2000.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2132245/posts?page=429#429
It is no coincidence that ACORN recieved money, training, and political stategy to target key battleground states to benefit the RAT nominee.
It is no coincidence the ACORN teams railroaded the Clinton campaign’s primary bid for the Presidency.
It is no coincidence that hundreds of millions of dollars rolled in from foreign interests and primarily the MiddleEast to make the abundant salaries, campaign offices, and advertisements possible. This enabled 5 to 1 and in some cases 10 to 1 outspending in essential states.
It is no coincidence that he fights like tooth and nail to suppress and deny all ordinary inquiries into his past by having docuents either lost or sealed from public view.
We have not been outvoted, we have been frauded from multiple directions.
When did he make the “pledge’ of loyalty to America and to serve her interest’s above all others?.............
That must have been in Berlin, Germany when he declared himself ‘citizen of the world.’
The President could direct the Attorney General to join the lawsuits, or initiate one in an appropriate Federal District Court. There are probably laws against fraud in federal elections. There are certainly enough federal laws concerning elections, one of which is bound to cover fraudulently running for federal office, possibly raising campaign funds based on fraud.
Futher he could direct the FBI to investigate to find other indications of BO's ineligibility, or eligibility for that matter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.