Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: itsahoot

NO where in the Const. does it define “natural born.” It is the Congress’ right and duty to define.


567 posted on 11/15/2008 6:12:08 AM PST by PghBaldy (I shall call him President Little Squirt...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies ]


To: PghBaldy
NO where in the Const. does it define “natural born.” It is the Congress’ right and duty to define.

As they have several times, you just seem to want to ignore them. Obama did not qualify under the statutes that were in force when he was born, neither did John McCain.

Unless you think laws can be ex-post facto, and some have been so ruled by the Court, then your argument is moot.

595 posted on 11/15/2008 10:05:45 AM PST by itsahoot (We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson