Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP files suit to undo McCain rules; McCain-Feingold limits hurt presidential efforts
The Washington Times ^ | Thursday, November 13, 2008 | Ralph Z. Hallow

Posted on 11/12/2008 7:26:51 PM PST by Red Steel

MIAMI

The Republican Party will file federal lawsuits Thursday seeking to overthrow the McCain-Feingold federal campaign finance regulations, Republican National Committee Chairman Robert M. "Mike" Duncan revealed Wednesday night at a private dinner with the nation's Republican governors.

The move is considered a slap in the face of the Republican Party's failed 2008 presidential candidate, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, who was dramatically outspent by Democrat Barack Obama, and of President Bush, who signed McCain-Feingold into law in 2002.

"We will bring two federal suits tomorrow to strengthen the Republican Party," Mr. Duncan told The Washington Times.

Mr. Duncan said one suit will be filed in the District of Columbia to strike down the soft-money ban that is the central tenet ofthe McCain-Feingold Act - formally known as the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002.

The second suit will be in a Louisiana federal court to strike down the limits under the law Mr. McCain co-sponsored with Sen. Russ Feingold, Wisconsin Democrat, that control coordination between parties and their candidates.

"It prohibits us from spending over $84,000 in coordination with a candidate in a congressional race," Mr. Duncan said. "That means we have to find some group to raise and spend money but without any coordination" with the candidate, his campaign or the RNC.

"That does not allow for a unified message," he said. "We don't think there is anything corrupting about coordinating with a candidate."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; bho2008; cfr; feingold; gop; issues; mccain; mikeduncan; rnc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: teletech

No, MY mistake. I usually catch it, but didn’t this time.


41 posted on 11/12/2008 7:59:19 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

If they hadn’t signed onto it, they wouldn’t need to sue to overturn it.


42 posted on 11/12/2008 8:04:00 PM PST by Soul Seeker (Gov. Sarah Palin '08 -- President Sarah Palin '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

“The GOP opposes the very person they selected as their leader. No wonder the party lost the election. It has no moral compass.”

It had no moral compass once it selected that feeble, ego-driven RINO to be the nominee. With this move, it’s getting it’s moral compass BACK.


43 posted on 11/12/2008 8:05:23 PM PST by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Figured this one was coming. Looks like someone at RNC HQ finally got educated. Now if we we can just get Duncan out and bring in someone whose got a pair.


44 posted on 11/12/2008 8:09:28 PM PST by RescueTheRepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey

Just remember this is a news article and we don’t know the details about what was mentioned.


45 posted on 11/12/2008 8:09:41 PM PST by PhiKapMom ( BOOMER SOONER LetsGetThisRight.com RED STATE Oklahoma Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Wow. Good news. “Slap in the face”....lol.....well, sometimes that’s what’s needed for a wakeup call.


46 posted on 11/12/2008 8:10:20 PM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I kind of enjoyed seeing McCain’s own rules bite him in the @$$.


47 posted on 11/12/2008 8:10:59 PM PST by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Bush could have vetoed McCain-Feingold. Maybe he assumed the courts would declare it unconstitutional, but it was a stupid decision to sign it.


48 posted on 11/12/2008 8:12:05 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Um... word out to the idiots running the GOP... McCain hurt the party in the election. First, by being...well... John McCain. Second, he CHOSE to go with public finance - thus got outspent 5-1 in many areas.

While I completely agree that CFR is an absolute waste of the paper it is inked on - and is a violation of the Constitution - don’t blame it for McCain’s loss.

So, if you want to dump the law, then do it. There are plenty of reasons, and a Constitution that says it is wrong. But don’t use lame excuses. After all, CFR would not have passed without Republican votes...


49 posted on 11/12/2008 8:32:22 PM PST by TheBattman (Pray for our country....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor29

Too bad they didn’t do it in 2007.


50 posted on 11/12/2008 8:33:40 PM PST by Styria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hercuroc

Duncan is actually going to attempt being RNC Chair again?????


51 posted on 11/12/2008 8:36:01 PM PST by goodnesswins (CONSERVATIVES....saving America's A** whether you like it or not!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

No no no!

Comrade Juan McNuts passed this essential legislation with our co-commander, Feingold.

If we repudiate this foundational principle, it will mean we repudiate the leader chosen for us!


52 posted on 11/12/2008 8:37:59 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (SARAH *** JOE *** 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

As much as I hate what America has become in the last few weeks, I am able to enjoy the irony of this, despite it being long overdue.


53 posted on 11/12/2008 8:46:27 PM PST by LegendHasIt (Vote for Common Sense '08 ......... OOPS! too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Mr. Duncan said one suit will be filed in the District of Columbia to strike down the soft-money ban that is the central tenet ofthe McCain-Feingold Act

I thought the soft-money ban was upheld by the Supermes in "McCONNELL, UNITED STATES SENATOR, et al. v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION et al." in 2003.

54 posted on 11/12/2008 8:51:21 PM PST by CaptRon (Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Styria

Quite true. We have been so poorly represented by the people we have worked to elect, it’s unforgivable and unbelievable.


55 posted on 11/12/2008 8:52:51 PM PST by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Too late Duncan. Not believing you!!!
Remember this guy was appointed with Martinez to do the daily work of the RNC while Martinez was in the Senate and he now wants to chair the RNC! He was for amnesty and is responsible for the state of affairs our party is now in to a great extent.
Go Michael Steele!


56 posted on 11/12/2008 9:01:55 PM PST by IdahoPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

It bit McCain more than his opponent because his opponent declined to abide by it once he found out he could make and spend way more by eschewing public financing. I don’t think even little Barry expected the amount of donations that rolled in from here and abroad. I think he expected McCain to be rolling in corporate lobby dough and himself on a shoestring.


57 posted on 11/12/2008 9:02:00 PM PST by informavoracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Throw out the whole thing.


58 posted on 11/12/2008 10:35:25 PM PST by TheFourthMagi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Neither John McCain nor his anti-Constitution McCain-Feingold act ever had anything to do with a moral compass in the first place. Opposing both is awesome.


59 posted on 11/12/2008 10:37:55 PM PST by TheFourthMagi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

You Can’t Always Get What You Want-Rolling Stones

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPovuLgo0Wo&feature=related


60 posted on 11/12/2008 10:40:29 PM PST by fatima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson