Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lewisglad

Sarah is better off as a Governor. Governors actually do stuff.


4 posted on 11/05/2008 3:04:51 AM PST by acsuc99 (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: acsuc99
Being a sitting US Senator would shut Noonan, Will, Frum etc. up in a hurry.

Over time they will come to love her like we do!

7 posted on 11/05/2008 3:06:14 AM PST by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: acsuc99
Thant’s what I question. At least as governor she gets executive experience which obviously is sadly need in the country today.Maybe she is better off as governor.why put her in with a bunch of lawyers, thieves, crooks and low lives.
27 posted on 11/05/2008 3:33:23 AM PST by rodguy911 (HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: acsuc99

yup! then she can come back and run in 2012:)


29 posted on 11/05/2008 3:34:20 AM PST by CanadianMusherinMI (drill baby drill/mine baby mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: acsuc99

Agree. As I’ve said all along, her experience as Governor is far more significant than the other 3 as Senators. I’d hate to see her “diluted” be being “demoted” to Senator.

I may even consider moving to Alaska!


35 posted on 11/05/2008 3:40:04 AM PST by generally (Don't act stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: acsuc99
Yup. The Senate is where hair pieces and plugs go to die. Obama got out just in time. Look at what the Senate has done to Pelosi.
38 posted on 11/05/2008 3:47:12 AM PST by Leisler (Obama is going to give us all Unicorns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: acsuc99

She has to take the timing into consideration. You have to start running for President 2 years before the election, so if she wants to run she’d have to start in 2010, which is when she would be up for re-election in Alaska. I don’t see how she could run, get elected, and immediately start running for President. Of course during a 2010 election, she’d be asked in debates, etc., “are you running for President?”. She can’t very well say YES and expect to get re-elected. So, then her choices would seem to be to not run again in 2010 and start on a Presidential campaign OR take Stephens seat in the US Senate. That would give her a couple of years in the Senate. What would be better to run for President as - a sitting US Senator? Or an ex-1-term governor?


42 posted on 11/05/2008 3:55:19 AM PST by GLDNGUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: acsuc99
I don't see her going to Washington. She's happy being Governor Of Alaska.

I'm torn between that and her placating her foes with Washington experience. Of course, it's all a crock anyway. Any stick will do to beat a horse.

Godspeed Sarah! We conservatives are behind you 100%.

92 posted on 11/05/2008 5:55:01 AM PST by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: acsuc99
Governors definitely play an extremely important role. However, Governor of Alaska is a relatively small role that is unlikely to give her the kind of experience that people would consider a stepping stone to the Presidency. Alaska's population is too small, and the lives a lot of people live there are different enough to make it harder for people to think she can relate to them.

Being a US Senator is a different but very important role, especially with Democrat majorities in both houses. True conservatives are rare in the Senate. It seems as if most politicians sell their souls before reaching the US Senate. We are going to need as many strong conservatives as we can get to fight Obama's judicial appointments, and to prevent the Senate from approving bad treaties that the Obama administration seeks to have us enter into.

She's a wonderful asset no matter where she ends up.

97 posted on 11/05/2008 6:15:36 AM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: acsuc99

I agree. Senators have no clue about the people. Sarah needs to stay on as the Governor. But what do you bet they go after her to neutralize her for the next four years.


101 posted on 11/05/2008 6:18:24 AM PST by truthluva ("Character is doing the right thing even when no one is looking"..J.C. Watts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: acsuc99

This would keep in in the national eye.

Put her on the Senate Foreign Relations committe.

I say “yes.”


119 posted on 11/05/2008 7:52:52 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (A Jew voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Col. Sanders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: acsuc99

I agree. She’d be wasting her time in Congress. Stick with the governorship until 2012.


122 posted on 11/05/2008 8:05:09 AM PST by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: acsuc99

I agree. The only reason why a senator won this time is that the other guy was a senator. Historically, governors have better chances of winning. Besides, Patomac water is particularly rancid in Capitol Hill.


138 posted on 11/05/2008 8:51:32 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Rats messed up this economy: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2115485/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: acsuc99

That’s true. She will get a lot more done.


172 posted on 11/05/2008 5:29:16 PM PST by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: acsuc99
Sarah is better off as a Governor. Governors actually do stuff.

Eactly. And as others have said here, Sara needs to stay away from DC and what will be an extremely toxic environment for her, since it will give the opposition a chance to further smear her when she votes in a cogent, moral manner in a virulently irrational and immoral democratic controlled Congress. In Alaska, she is protected by an adoring (mostly) populace and she gets to breathe pure and untainted air. Both chemically and politically. I envy her.

175 posted on 11/06/2008 7:17:46 AM PST by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson