Posted on 10/29/2008 11:59:21 AM PDT by Rppoulin
You may have heard that Wednesday night Barack Obama will be on five different TV networks speaking directly to the American people. He bought 30 minutes of airtime from the different networks, a very expensive purchase. But hey, he can afford it. Barack Obama is loaded, way more loaded than John McCain, way more loaded than any presidential candidate has ever been at this stage of the campaign.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
True that he broke his promise, but it’s also been obvious for months.
Campbell Brown is “in the tank” for Obama and simply to trying, unsuccessfully, to criticize him a tiny bit (and a ton late) now that, she thinks, the election is won. She’d never utter a peep against her Messiah if the polls were closer.
I’m going to watch Animal Planet besides I already Voted for McCain/Palin.
“Campbell Brown is “in the tank””
Maybe she’s mad that Obama attempt to buy CNN time would preempt her own face time.
Ego above all for the MSM.
he got his money illegally, as thos ewho make less than $200 aren’t monitored. Anyone from overseas or locally can donate with fake names and address
Cmon, when have democrats EVER played by the rules?
Campbell Brown: Obama breaks promise on campaign finance
_________________________________________________
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Campbell brown, there is a special hell for you...
You oughta be outlawed...
How dare you speak against Obama...
Why not ????
I dont know...
I keep asking the Obamabots...
They dont know either and cant tell me why...
I guess ya just shouldnt is why...
/s
Why is she just now getting to this subject? Didn’t he break his promise...like...months ago? And don’t you(Campbell Brown) think there are more important things at this point to be outraged about?
WHAT A SURPRISE!!! He is a dimocrat, he is NOT EXPECTED to keep his word. Show me one commie dim that does keep their word. Integrity is a word that simply is not in the dimocrat dictionary.
But don't forget what Campbell Brown did when the race, according to most polls was closer.
He broke that particular promise several months ago. Real up-to-the-minute journalism there, Campbell.
QUOTE-Barack Obama is loaded, way more loaded than John McCain-END QUOTE
Aw man, this is so true. It’s also true of anyone who’d vote for Obama!
Someone has to use the line
Obama’s 30 minute TV ads - paid for by his broken campaign promise!
“Campbell thinks Obama is far enough ahead and she can play it fair”.
...I don’t think so. BO will have her head on a plate if he wins. Can’t take ANY critisism. She’s pi$$ed about something OR the latest info about BO scares the crap out her.
But hey, he can afford it. Barack Obama is loaded, way more loaded than John McCain, way more loaded than any presidential candidate has ever been at this stage of the campaign...
And here's why:
Why Obama's campaign doesn't have AVS turned on for it's Credit Card Donations (Blood Boiling Alert)
They say this infomercial airing tonight is a gamble, since it could be perceived by the public as presumptuous. Lots of undecideds still out there. It's not over yet!
Campbell recently became a mother and sometimes this activates formerly latent brain cells.
(I used to like Campbell when she was first starting out, so I know she had a life before she did the Rat-Mind-Meld.)
Here’s what is going to happen to Campbell:
Because she dared mention that Obama had broken his promise-—which fact is, in fact, indisputable-—she is going to get a firsthand glimpse at the dark side of her party’s bottomfeeders.
Perhaps, as has happened with the pumas, she will discover that there is a certain, um, anti-intellectualism that pervades her party and which is beneath the dawning newfound realism that often comes with motherhood-—a time when the world and the future suddenly beings to make more sense.
The courageous among Obama’s own supporters concede this decision was really made for one reason, simply because it was to Obama’s financial advantage.
On this issue today, former Sen. Bob Kerrey of Nebraska, an Obama supporter, writes in The New York Post, “a hypocrite is a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue — who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings. And that, it seems to me, is what we are doing now.”
What else Campbell needs to account for in her analysis:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/28/AR2008102803413_pf.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.