Posted on 09/07/2008 4:14:17 PM PDT by jern
Drudge: NY Times Prepares To Front Expose on Palin's Baby...Developing...
DU TROLL ALERT
Or pressed Rosemary Woods' foot on that pedal that erased 18 minutes of tape. Naughty, naughty Trig.
noun a public exposure or revelation, as of something discreditable: Certain cheap magazines make a fortune out of sensational exposés
Yeap, sounds like the NYTimes to me.
The NYT has been left looking stupid too many times. Whatever this is, they think its foolproof or they wouldn’t touch it. I bet evidence has been planted somewhere, somebody has been threatened or something. Its going to look real enough to fool people.
"The first child can come at any time... the rest come after 9 months...."
There is one thing so sick that I could see Pravda MSM American doing it .........
The baby is a result of incest.
Now don’t go flaming me!
What other sick, perverted thing could they come up with?
That’s a combo of John Kerry and Phillis Diller right? YUK
NYTimes is not going to do a fluff piece on this baby. No way, no how. They are trying to get social conservatives to turn against Palin. That’s what this has always been about. Thus far, all attacks have backfired.
We’ll see how it plays out, but right now, Palin looks like the Roadrunner and the media look like Wile E Coyote.
Nice stock chart....is that Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac? Obviously, an inept management team. They should be fired or maybe a treasury bailout.
I don’t believe this “developing” story for 1 second. Advice to Palin and McCain.. don’t comment.. let the NYT hang itself, for if this is true and there is ANY story on their baby, any story at all, the outcry will be tremendous... it will doom the NYT.
and it will only further the McCain/Palin cause.
Typical Sunday night attention getter. Very common for Drudge.
If they print a trash story about the baby we will find out on election day exactly how many far left whackos there really are are in this country- because that will be the number of votes Obama will get. I would say- oh 10%.
if you guys saw the Fox special on Sarah, she was showing her belly and smacking it. Good luck with the Bristol angle lol
Maybe it is that Piper is the brains behind her mother who just repeats what Piper tells her to say?
Good GRIEF- and the Vanity Fair piece thanks DAILY KOS as one of the sources it used for this piece?!?!
OMG!
The problem is that so many of their Lefty readership are immune to the gross incivilities they introduce as 'newsworthy'.
But who knows. . .maybe. . .some light will break threw the darkness here; and the 'powers that be' at NYT's WILL fatally impale themselves on their own words.
Sarah was interviewed in the Anchorage Daily News, and said that she was "leaking" amniotic fluid. She also said that after 4 kids, she knew what labor pains felt like, and she knew she wasn't in labor.
She called her doctor, and he approved her trip back to Alaska. She was back home for about 24 (36?) hours before Trig was born, albeit via a C-section.
There's no controversy here. This was a matter between Sarah and her doctor. No reputable doctor will second-guess it. Anything else is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt at character assassination.
Why does Drudge, Rush, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, et al, continue to give the Slimes free publicity?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.