Skip to comments.
Is VFW Post Phone Message Offensive?
WNEP -- Newswatch 16 ^
| Aug 6, 2008
| Norm Jones
Posted on 08/14/2008 11:32:33 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: Rodentking
“People are free to speak whatever they want. Just like we are free to listen or NOT.”
My take as well - You have no right to be heard, and especially have no right to make ME provide someone who understands your language.
21
posted on
08/14/2008 12:04:46 PM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Those are men and women who fought overseas (hence the name of the group) to protect our nation, constitution & society. They, above all, should have the 1st Amendment right to say anything they damn well please!*************************
Amen!
22
posted on
08/14/2008 12:07:20 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Turret Gunner A20
I take it Ms. Arthofer doesn’t frequent her local VFW?
And I’d bet she called “Newswatch 16” to inform them of this huge story.
That and to flaunt her ignorance...
23
posted on
08/14/2008 12:09:46 PM PDT
by
astyanax
(All play. No work.)
To: Turret Gunner A20
Susquehannah county - where is that ?
Are they a bunch of antipathetic, bitter Pennsylvanians?
To: Rick.Donaldson
That message would also discriminate against Scandinavians and Germans who are the racial ancestors of many of us “white” people.
To: Borges; jagusafr
Is the VFW goverment funded? If it isnt then the Bill of Rights doesnt apply does it.
The military is gov't funded.
And you check your Rights at the door...
Am I missing something?
26
posted on
08/14/2008 12:21:08 PM PDT
by
astyanax
(All play. No work.)
To: Turret Gunner A20
"Racist. I mean, that's like, this is a free country, isn't it? That's what my understanding is," said Teresa Arthofer of Montrose. She wasn't happy hearing about the message, calling it unconstitutional.... "Does it say English speech? It just says freedom of speech. No where in there does it say freedom of English speech. It just says, freedom of speech," Arthofer added. [Boy!! now there's a whiz kid for ya!!] Sounds like the town of Montrose still hasn't lost their idiot.
27
posted on
08/14/2008 12:28:32 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(Sell San Francisco to China to finance Obama health care, Bill O'Reilly)
To: astyanax
The VFW is not a Government subsidized agency. It is self funded - so the 1st Amendment DOES apply.
28
posted on
08/14/2008 12:34:02 PM PDT
by
Core_Conservative
(Proud to be "The self-righteous, gun-totin, military lovin, abortion-hatin, gay-loathin'...")
To: Core_Conservative; Borges
Is the VFW goverment funded? If it isnt then the Bill of Rights doesnt apply does it.
I was actually wondering if Borges really meant that something had to be Gov't funded to have Rights?
29
posted on
08/14/2008 12:39:53 PM PDT
by
astyanax
(All play. No work.)
To: astyanax
They get their money from dues, bingo, donations, etc. I do not believe they get any government money. Was trying to look it up, best I can tell, they get nothing.
30
posted on
08/14/2008 12:40:44 PM PDT
by
ozarkgirl
(If McCain can vote on the basis of principle and conscience over party, so can I.)
To: astyanax
I was a little confused about the question myself. Hard to figure out the double negatives.
31
posted on
08/14/2008 12:42:41 PM PDT
by
ozarkgirl
(If McCain can vote on the basis of principle and conscience over party, so can I.)
To: ozarkgirl; Core_Conservative
You misunderstand me.
They are a private organization.
They can say whatever they like on their answering machine.
Just because some clown thinks it’s “racist” doesn’t make a bit of difference.
32
posted on
08/14/2008 12:45:06 PM PDT
by
astyanax
(All play. No work.)
To: Turret Gunner A20
"Racist. I mean, that's like, this is a free country, isn't it? That's what my understanding is," said Teresa Arthofer of Montrose. She wasn't happy hearing about the message, calling it unconstitutional. Just another comment from Liberal Bizzaro World.
33
posted on
08/14/2008 12:46:35 PM PDT
by
Doctor Raoul
(Fire the CIA and hire the Free Clinic, someone who knows how to stop leaks.)
To: jagusafr
Unfortunately, “unconstitutional” has become a euphemism for “,I don’t like it and think it should be illegal,” by people who have never read the document and don’t have any idea what it actually says. I’ve heard people claim that all sorts of silly things are unconstitutional, not only things that the Constitution is silent on but (like this idiot woman) but things that the Constitution clearly says are permitted.
To: noname07718
I call these sad folks Offense Whores, and when I find one, I go out of my way to give them great pleasure and happiness. I try to offend them in every way I can think of. I like your style.
35
posted on
08/14/2008 1:04:58 PM PDT
by
Retired COB
(Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
To: Turret Gunner A20
The phone message is stupid because it’s counter-productive. Those who oppose illegal immigration need to get a clue and realize that the correct way to do things is to discredit people who support illegal immigration. Just leaving comments here isn’t going to do much good. You have to either get out there and ask politicians real questions (not rants), or you need to go to other sites and leave comments discrediting those on the other side.
For a tangible example, see my comments (”NoMoreBlatherDotCom”) here:
time-blog.com/swampland/2008/08/re_scholarship.html
If you want to have an impact, do things like that. If you just want to preach to the choir, do things like the VFW did.
To: Turret Gunner A20
Nope - why should we have to learn seventeen different languages and 252 dialects just to have someone communicate with us??????????
This is America - not England ........
37
posted on
08/14/2008 1:14:48 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
("What Our Enemies Couldn't Do To Us Our Liberal Democrat Politicians Will")
To: astyanax
Well, yeah - you don’t check your rights at the door when you enter the military. Military members retain the vast majority of rights that civilians have, and those we “give up” involve readiness and good order and discipline. The VFW isn’t a branch of government, it’s a private entity that’s given special tax treatment as a military fraternal order. There’s simply nothing legally wrong with their voicemail message.
Colonel, USAFR
38
posted on
08/14/2008 1:18:18 PM PDT
by
jagusafr
("Bugs, Mr. Rico! Zillions of 'em!" - Robert Heinlein)
To: Turret Gunner A20
No— illegals, the churches that help them, the politicians who help them, the scumbags who hire them are ALL offensive.
39
posted on
08/14/2008 1:18:26 PM PDT
by
RJS1950
(The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
To: jagusafr
I agree completely.
It was just a bit of a generalization regarding swapping the Bill of Rights for the U.C.M.J.
And obviously nothing is illegal, I assume the writer is just trying to ignite a “public outcry” of fellow like-minded morons.
40
posted on
08/14/2008 1:38:54 PM PDT
by
astyanax
(All play. No work.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson