Posted on 06/25/2008 3:38:17 PM PDT by abt87
CHICAGO, Illinois (CNN) Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama says he disagrees with a Supreme Court decision striking down the death penalty for child rapists, telling reporters Wednesday that states should be able to execute people for heinous crimes.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnnwire.blogs.cnn.com ...
That’s not the Supreme Court that I know?
That is the first intelligent thing I’ve heard Curious George say yet. Maybe the Man in the Yellow Hat told him to be nice to the humans in America (temporarilly).
That is the first intelligent thing I’ve heard Curious George say yet. Maybe the Man in the Yellow Hat told him to be nice to the humans in America (temporarilly).
Well isn’t it normal in Islamic countries to execute the woman who was raped?
Stopped-clock syndrome, I guess.
Right on, Barack. I’m not afraid to agree with an opponent who falls ass-backward into the right answer every once in a while.
H
He will wait until he is in the White House (God Forbid) then he will declare that the federal government can always dictate policy to the states.
.....I hit POST once, I swear to God....
In my OPINION, Obama is simply lying — to try to appear more centrist than he is.
Just as he is lying (in my opinion, again) when he says he favors only gay “civil unions” but not “gay marriage.”
Obama knows perfectly well that the kind of Justices he would put on SCOTUS would join with today’s decision.
Total two-facedness. Doesn’t have the guts to say what he really believes. “I oppose the death penalty, so I can’t say I disagree with today’s decision striking it down in one instance.” Gee, that’d take actual courage.
That is the first thing I have heard him say that I agree with. Of course, what he says to the next group of bleeding hearts will be quite different.
I suspect that during the Obama administration speculating and “price gouging” will be defined as “heinous crimes” warranting the death penalty.
How can a guy who opposes the death penalty generally claim to support rape executions?
He would have been crucified if he said otherwise, but now there is no chance that he would have to do anything. I mean it's about as ballsy as cussing someone out after the cops have filled them foll of lead:-)
pogo101: “Obama knows perfectly well that the kind of Justices he would put on SCOTUS would join with todays decision.”
Dead on right! Obama has already clearly said he would nominate justices in the mold of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Even if he truly disagrees with the ruling, he knows full well how another Ruth Bader type will rule.
It’s a sham, a run toward the middle in order to try and win the election.
He’ll allow the conviction, but he’ll never allow the execution.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Like treating patients outside the National Health System, price gouging, and posting lies against the working class on internet websites?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.