Posted on 05/08/2008 7:19:07 PM PDT by blam
Why the Cyclone in Myanmar Was So Deadly
Michael Casey in Bangkok, Thailand
Associated Press
May 8, 2008
It was Asia's answer to Hurricane Katrina—though with a reported 100,000 killed, it was many times more deadly.
Packing winds upward of 120 miles an hour (193 kilometers an hour), Cyclone Nargis became one of Asia's deadliest storms by hitting land at one of the lowest points in Myanmar (also called Burma) and setting off a storm surge that reached 25 miles (40 kilometers) inland.
"When we saw the [storm] track, I said, 'Uh oh, this is not going to be good,'" said Mark Lander, a meteorology professor at the University of Guam.
"It would create a big storm surge. It was like Katrina going into New Orleans."
"Cyclone" is the name given to a hurricane when it occurs in the northern Indian Ocean or, as is the case with Cyclone Nargis, the Bay of Bengal (see map). (Get the basics on hurricanes/cyclones.)
Deadly Path
Forecasters began tracking the cyclone April 28 as it first headed toward India. As projected, the storm took a sharp turn eastward. But it didn't follow the typical cyclone track, which leads to Bangladesh or Myanmar's mountainous northwest.
Instead, the cyclone swept into the low-lying Irrawaddy River Delta in central Myanmar. The result was the worst disaster ever in the impoverished country.
It was the first time such an intense storm is known to have hit the delta, said Jeff Masters, co-founder and director of meteorology at the San Francisco-based Web site Weather Underground.
He called it "one of those once-in-every-500-years kind of things."
"The easterly component of the path is unusual," Masters said. "It tracked right over the most vulnerable part of the country, where most of the people live." When the storm made landfall early Saturday at the mouth of the Irrawaddy River, the cyclone's battering winds pushed a wall of water as tall as 12 feet (3.7 meters) some 25 miles (40 kilometers) inland, laying waste to villages and killing tens of thousands.
Most of the dead were in the delta, where farm families sleeping in shacks barely above sea level were swept to their deaths.
Almost 95 percent of the houses and other buildings in seven townships were destroyed, Myanmar's government says. UN officials estimate 1.5 million people were left in severe straits.
"When you look at the satellite picture of before and after the storm, the effects look eerily similar to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in how it inundated low-lying areas," said Ken Reeves, director of forecasting for AccuWeather.com.
The Irrawaddy Delta "is huge, and the interaction of water and land lying right at sea level allowed the tidal surge to deliver maximum penetration of sea water over land," Reeves said.
"Storms like this do most of their killing through floods, with salt water being even more dangerous than fresh water."
The delta had lost most of its mangrove forests along the coast to shrimp farms and rice paddies over the past decade. That removed what scientists say is one of nature's best defenses against violent storms.
"If you look at the path of the [cyclone] that hit Myanmar, it hit exactly where it was going to do the most damage, and it's doing the most damage because much of the protective vegetation was cleared," said Jeff NcNeely, chief scientist for the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
"It's an expensive lesson, but it has been one taught repeatedly," he said. "You just wonder why governments don't get on this."
Global Warming?
Some environmentalists suggested global warming may have played a role.
Last year the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded that warming oceans could contribute to increasingly severe cyclones with stronger winds and heavier rains.
"While we can never pinpoint one disaster as the result of climate change, there is enough scientific evidence that climate change will lead to intensification of tropical cyclones," said Sunita Narain, director of the India-based environmental group Centre for Science and Environment.
"Nargis is a sign of things to come," she said.
"The victims of these cyclones are climate change victims, and their plight should remind the rich world that it is doing too little to contain its greenhouse gas emissions."
Weather experts, however, are divided over whether global warming is a factor in catastrophic storms.
At a January conference of the American Meteorological Society, some experts postulated that warmer ocean temperatures may actually reduce the strength of cyclones and hurricanes.
Masters, at Weather Underground, said Wednesday that, in the case of Nargis, the meteorological data in the Indian Ocean region "is too short and too poor in quality to make judgments about whether tropical cyclones have been affected by global warming."
Unnecessary Deaths?
Despite assertions by Myanmar's military government that it had warned people about the storm, critics contend the junta didn't do enough to alert the delta and failed to organize any evacuations, perhaps resulting in unnecessary deaths.
"Villagers were totally unaware," said 38-year-old Khin Khin Myawe, interviewed in the hard-hit delta town of Labutta.
"We knew the cyclone was coming but only because the wind was very strong. No local authorities ever came to us with information about how serious the storm was."
The India Meteorological Department, one of six regional warning centers set up by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), began sending regular storm advisories April 27. The information appeared in Myanmar's state-run newspapers, on radio, and on television 48 hours ahead of the storm.
But the international advisories said nothing about a storm surge. And Myanmar, unlike its neighbors Bangladesh and India, has no radar network to help predict the location and height of surges, the WMO said.
There also wasn't any coordinated effort on the part of the junta to move people out of low-lying areas, even though information was available about the expected time and location of landfall.
"How is it possible that there was such a great death toll in the 21st century, when we have imagery from satellites in real time and there are specialized meteorology centers in all the regions?" said Olavo Rasquinho of the UN Typhoon Committee Secretariat.
Bangladesh has a storm-protection system that includes warning sirens, evacuation routes, and sturdy towers to shelter people—measures that were credited with limiting the death toll from last year's Cyclone Sidr to 3,100.
Atiq A. Rahman, executive director of the Bangladesh Center for Advanced Studies and a disaster specialist, said Myanmar's death toll would have been lower if it had had such a system.
"Taking some action to move people from affected areas would have dramatically helped reduce the numbers of causalities. Absolutely," Rahman said.
But junta officials and some weather experts said evacuating a large area with millions of residents would have been nearly impossible, given the poor roads, the distance to some villages, and the likely refusal of some families to leave.
"Even if they warned them, they can't go anywhere. Or they are afraid to go anywhere, because they are afraid of losing their property," said Lander, the University of Guam professor.
"It is debatable how much of a mass exodus you could have had."
Even if the government cares, these storms can overwhelm any defences, and if people are in the way, they will die. Can’t blame even the most negligent government for an event of this magnitude. Of course, one can blame them for their poor responses and the general undevelopment of the country.
If they were dependent on local supplies of fresh water, then these would inundated. The land will be spoiled.
No necessarily. At the height of the Soviet famine(s) the government regularly exported Russian grain for cash and/or weapons, leaving international relief agencies to feed the starving.
Thanks. I think. Well - not really. Now I have to get rid of this pit in my stomach and the disgust in my mouth out. It really does piss me off as I think you are probably exactly right. And our aid will of course be distributed by the junta to “those most deemed in need”.
The same generals have sat on their hands with their troop in the street to preserve order
..............
the only thing that they have their attention on is the farce election tomorrow, maybe on Sunday or monday, after a few thousand people die they will give visa to all non American aid workers
I have not heard about anything happening that was attributed to the cyclone, just some of the usual thunderstorms that cause caused some damage, but in limited areas and that is normal for this time of year
those warnings were about some monsoons building up in the gulf, and the south china sea, and yesterday, they were speculating some other storms might follow in the wake of nargis
And our aid will of course be distributed by the junta to “those most deemed in need”.
..............
Which in the case of the Junta means only them and their friends
I would say that killing 100,000 versus killing 1000 or so qualifies as being many times more deadly (I can’t remember the official count after Katrina but I think that’s about right - in fact it may have been less than 1000). Or am I missing something here?
Oh yeah. Thanks. I forgot to complete my thought.. LOL.
You understand!
They didn't get out of the way, because they didn't KNOW about it. Their government made the conscious decision NOT to tell them about it!
injured/critically injured people without medical care—bandages—drugs—pain killers, no shelter, dead animals, bodies in the sun, no food, families decimated, 40% of the dead children.......feces and urine, broken legs, some injured lying in the sun.
Cholera, typhoid, gang green, starvation, dehydration, in the 3rd world.
This is a monumental disaster that makes anyone’s problems here not on the same level. Not to say that there are not severe problems for many here, but the scale is hard to imagine. It must be just about impossible to be in.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.