To: Yardstick
i suppose you are correct.
"It was Asia's answer to Hurricane Katrinathough with a reported 100,000 killed, it was many times more deadly."
how do you suppose it could be 'many times more deadly'?
To: wafflehouse
I would say that killing 100,000 versus killing 1000 or so qualifies as being many times more deadly (I can’t remember the official count after Katrina but I think that’s about right - in fact it may have been less than 1000). Or am I missing something here?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson