Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yardstick
i suppose you are correct.

"It was Asia's answer to Hurricane Katrina—though with a reported 100,000 killed, it was many times more deadly."

how do you suppose it could be 'many times more deadly'?
45 posted on 05/08/2008 11:10:06 PM PDT by wafflehouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: wafflehouse

I would say that killing 100,000 versus killing 1000 or so qualifies as being many times more deadly (I can’t remember the official count after Katrina but I think that’s about right - in fact it may have been less than 1000). Or am I missing something here?


50 posted on 05/09/2008 10:52:18 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson