Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian bombers intercepted near US Navy vessel (Tupolev 95 flew 2000ft directly over USS Nimitz)
ynet ^ | 02.12.08 | ynet

Posted on 02/11/2008 3:45:40 PM PST by Flavius

Edited on 02/11/2008 4:36:47 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

Russian bomber aircraft approached a US Aircraft carrier in the Pacific on Saturday and were intercepted by American fighter jets, a US Defense official said on Monday...

Excerpt. Story continues: YNetNews



Update:

Google AP

Navy Intercepts Russian Bombers

By LOLITA C. BALDOR – 1 hour ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. fighter planes intercepted two Russian bombers, including one that buzzed an American aircraft carrier in the western Pacific during the weekend, The Associated Press has learned.

A U.S. military official says that one Russian Tupolev 95 flew directly over the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz twice, at a low altitude of about 2,000 feet, while another bomber circled about 58 miles out. The official was speaking on condition of anonymity because the reports on the flights were classified as secret.

The Saturday incident, which never escalated beyond the flyover, comes amid heightened tensions between the United States and Russia over U.S. plans for a missile defense system based in Poland and the Czech Republic.

Such Russian bomber flights were common during the Cold War, but have been rare since.

The bombers were among four Russian Tupolev 95s launched from Ukrainka in the middle of the night, including one that Japanese officials say violated their country's airspace over an uninhabited island south of Tokyo.

U.S. officials tracked and monitored the bombers as two flew south along the Japanese coast, and two others flew farther east, coming closer to the Nimitz and the guided missile cruiser USS Princeton.

As the bombers got about 500 miles out from the U.S. ships, four F/A-18 fighters were launched from the Nimitz, the official said. The fighters intercepted the Russian bombers about 50 miles south of the Nimitz.

At least two U.S. F/A-18 Hornets trailed the bomber as it came in low over the Nimitz twice, while one or two of the other U.S. fighters followed the second bomber as it circled.

The official said there were no verbal communications between the U.S. and the Russians, and the Pentagon has not heard of any protests being filed by the United States. Historically, diplomatic protests were not filed in such incidents because they were so common during the Cold War era.

This is the first time Russian Tupolevs have flown over or interacted with a U.S. carrier since 2004.

In that incident, a Russian Tupolev flew over the aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk in the Sea of Japan on Jan. 29, 2004. Since then, however, relations between the U.S. and Russia have deteriorated to their worst point since the Cold War, largely due to the United States' plans to put a radar system in the Czech Republic and 10 missile defense interceptors in Poland.

The U.S. has defended the plan as necessary to protect its European allies from possible attacks by Iran. But the Kremlin has condemned the proposal, saying it would threaten Russia's security.

"We are being forced to take retaliatory steps," said Russian President Vladimir Putin, who also warned that a new arms race is under way.

Japan, meanwhile, filed a formal protest with the Russian Embassy in Tokyo after Saturday's incident, saying that one of the Russian bombers crossed into Japanese airspace for three minutes. Russia has denied there was an intrusion.

AP Google


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Russia; US: California
KEYWORDS: aerospace; bmd; cccp; coldwar2; communism; missiledefense; navair; putin; redairforce; redjihad; russia; securitybreach; sovietunion; usa; ussnimitz; ussr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-335 next last
To: jlasoon

You reallly don’t think they spend 700 dollars for a hammer and 6000 dollars for toilet seats do you ???


41 posted on 02/11/2008 4:59:50 PM PST by al baby (Hi mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: al baby

With this administration, nothing would surprise me.


42 posted on 02/11/2008 5:02:06 PM PST by jlasoon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

2,000 feet above is ridiculous. Doing it twice is qaudruple ridiculous.

They should be shot down next time.


43 posted on 02/11/2008 5:02:38 PM PST by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

It would seem to me, flying right over a carrier at low atltitude would be completely beyond the pale. How could the defenders possibly know they weren’t planning on sinking it? If they were attempting to sink it, then we would have allowed the Russians to simply sink a carrier with no defense.


44 posted on 02/11/2008 5:04:42 PM PST by yarddog (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

The U.S. has defended the plan as necessary to protect its European allies from possible attacks by Iran.


I do not buy this. If we are so scared of Iran then invite the Russians as well. Russians have been attacked by Iranians and fought wars with them a number of times ..the US never has except through Iran’s terrorist network.


45 posted on 02/11/2008 5:05:17 PM PST by eleni121 (+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

I think I read somewhere that the Ruskies were overflying British waters. It might have been last Summer.


46 posted on 02/11/2008 5:07:47 PM PST by alarm rider ("The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

And frozen turkeys just happen to fall out of F/A-18s... ;-)


47 posted on 02/11/2008 5:07:55 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TBall
I would sooner bid in a used toilet auction than choose between the above three.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

48 posted on 02/11/2008 5:10:17 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (The Constitution does not give me the authority to run your life - Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

I think that the knee-jerkers here would get pretty upset if our planes were shot down as they do the same thing to others’ ships.


49 posted on 02/11/2008 5:12:15 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

Hillary and obama would like to get together with the Russians and China and hold hands and sing Kumbi ya.
Nothing like a strong President and a strong defense policy!


50 posted on 02/11/2008 5:13:45 PM PST by ronnie raygun (Id rather be hunting with dick than driving with ted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JustDoItAlways
They should be shot down next time.

Yeah right, and start World War 3? We don't even attack Iranian speedboats for cyring out loud.

51 posted on 02/11/2008 5:15:31 PM PST by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Good day for a Bear hunt.


52 posted on 02/11/2008 5:16:09 PM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Checkmate Cruiser")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

Well they lost the last race cuz they ran out of breath(money). Now they are rolling in it. Good thing we aren’t on track to waste lots of money on social programs.
Oh... wait


53 posted on 02/11/2008 5:17:17 PM PST by Eyes Unclouded (We won't ever free our guns but be sure we'll let them triggers go....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

>This is sickening and disgusting.<

Yes, our President is sickening and disgusting. The next one will be more so.


54 posted on 02/11/2008 5:20:04 PM PST by B4Ranch (("Life is a food chain; if you're not at the top, you're on the menu." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

Thanks for the run down of recent acknowledged flyovers.


55 posted on 02/11/2008 5:22:49 PM PST by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Does it normally take 450 miles to intercept another aircraft? It sounds like aircraft were launched to intercept the bomber when it was 500 miles out, and did intercept it at 50 miles out. (Maybe it does, I really don’t know.)


56 posted on 02/11/2008 5:23:01 PM PST by kc8ukw (Sign the ALLOW incandescent bulbs petition: http://www.petitiononline.com/incand/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
I never would have imagined that the US Military would allow any plane fly over one of our ships, especially an aircraft carrier.
57 posted on 02/11/2008 5:23:49 PM PST by Clovis_Skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

ping


58 posted on 02/11/2008 5:25:13 PM PST by AnimalLover ( ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Our doctrine has always been to have AEW and CAP up to try and interdict their recon or strike aircraft far enough out to prevent the cruise missile launch.

Read the article. The CAP was launced when the bombers were 500 mile out, they were intercepted more than 50 miles out, and had F-18s on their wing as they flew over the ship. SOP from the height of the Cold War.

59 posted on 02/11/2008 5:28:03 PM PST by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
March 4, 1981, flying over the USS Belleau Wood in the western Pacific.


60 posted on 02/11/2008 5:29:45 PM PST by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty; The Pendleton 8: We are not going down without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-335 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson