Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Primary Voters: Vote against McCain! Vote for deadlock! Vote anyone but McCain!
Feb 9, 2008 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 02/09/2008 11:44:24 AM PST by Jim Robinson

Folks, there still may be a slim chance to force a deadlocked convention. I'm no election math wizard, but I believe it's still mathematically possible for McCain to NOT receive the requisite number of delegates to win the nomination. But it would require a great turnout of passionate conservative voters in the remaining primary states to accomplish.

The trick would be for all remaining primary conservative voters to vote for their favorite candidate as if he were still in the race. Fred's name is still on the ballot. So is Hunter's and Romney's. Shoot, vote for Huckabee, Paul or even Giuliani if you wish. Anyone but McCain!

None of the others can possibly win, but it's still possible for McCain to lose. Let it go to the convention and force the GOP to publicly fight it out as if its very life depended on it. Because it does.

What do we have to lose? As it stands now, more and more conservatives are declaring their intentions to sit out the general. If McCain is our candidate, looks like Hillary/Obama will be our next president. Don't let it happen. Vote for any GOPer other than McCain!


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008; anyonebutmccain; elections; gopconvention; juanmccain; mccain; mcstain; ourmexicanoverlords; rino; strategy; thelarazacandidate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 421-434 next last
To: tabsternager

He was a hell of a lot better candidate than Fred Thompson, that’s for sure. Fred was a complete waste of time, and that was pretty obvious to those with eyes to see. But Romney never caught hold either. And he’s mormon, so that means he’s hiding pointy little horns under his coiffe.


101 posted on 02/09/2008 12:27:51 PM PST by Huck (Buzzards gotta eat, same as worms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Give me a few minutes to format the data

Good. And be sure that it's authorized programming that you are using - k?

102 posted on 02/09/2008 12:28:41 PM PST by don-o (Do the RIGHT thing. Become a monthly donor. End Freepathons forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi
And risk Huck actually becoming the nominee? I want him off the stage—now!

Scenario....you have a proverbial gun to your head, you have less than a nanosecond to pull the lever, if you don't pull it the world explodes and human kind is wiped out. Who you gonna pull that lever for...Mcpain or Huck?

103 posted on 02/09/2008 12:28:48 PM PST by processing please hold ( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Once you get over the delusion that the republican party is conservative you can see reality. And, there were candidates who were conservative or at least on some issues...

They all lost. To me that says that the republican party is not as conservative as people like to think it is.


104 posted on 02/09/2008 12:29:11 PM PST by misterrob (There is no such thing as a RINO.....CINO on the other hand has meaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: libh8er; Jim Robinson
That would depend on who the opponent is. We don't always get what we want, but if Hillary is the nominee and conservatives still decide to sit it out because of a childish tantrum,

I see you are a slow learner.

You, and others, are making no headway with the "childish tantrum" nonsense.

First of all, it is a gross mis-characterization of the principled fight that CONSERVATIVEs are putting up to save their party from a McCain presidency that would doom the GOP to be the minority party for decades to come, as well as, kill the reagan coalition in the GOP.

Secondly, the more you make such childish statements, you further deepen my resolve to make sure McCain looses.
105 posted on 02/09/2008 12:29:21 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Like I said, Huckabee was not my favorite. Fred was, and after he dropped out I voted for Romney on Jan 29th. If I were voting today or in the future primary race, I would vote for Huckabee over McCain. Know many folks plan on voting for their favorites who are already out of the race, but don’t think that does anything except help McCAin. Unless I am wrong in thinking that although votes for others would be counted, those still in the race who win over the other get the delegates. Do delegates go to someone who is out of the race if they happen to win a state?


106 posted on 02/09/2008 12:29:21 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

You’re telling people to vote for candidates who have given up and already overtly or tacitly thrown their support to McCain already—Fred, Giuliani, Romney, whoever. What’s the point now? These folks’ votes would only be cast for McCain on the second ballot anyway.

This is why I asked you to choose a straw poll here on FR to have all Freepers use as a benchmark, to have us all line up behind someone conservative before primaries started. Too late for that now.

Of course, you and Rush and Ann and the rest of the what-do-we-do-now conservative media crowd can at least in the short term enjoy your sour grapes ratings and site traffic. I’m sure the audience numbers will climb as disenchanted conservatives go somewhere to vent, so rake in those higher management fees and donations while you can. When Hillary or Obama get in, they’ll reinstate the fairness doctrine and force you to subsidize DU.


107 posted on 02/09/2008 12:29:37 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (McCain's just like W--except, of course, McCain served. Another 4 years of this mess? Hell, no!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I voted for Fred here in Baton Rouge this AM.


108 posted on 02/09/2008 12:29:37 PM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya's fan
All things being fair I might agree with you but hillary and her gang don’t play fair, they cheat. She will cheat against Obama too, but maybe his side will recognize her dirty tricks better than our side.
109 posted on 02/09/2008 12:30:38 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

McCain. The Huck is creepy. And he’d better not get the VP slot.


110 posted on 02/09/2008 12:30:49 PM PST by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

Romney.


111 posted on 02/09/2008 12:31:38 PM PST by Gator113 (America just traded away the possibility of a dream, for what is certain to be a nightmare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: definitelynotaliberal
We started this with Ditter’s point about voting Obama.

Yes. If Obama wins the nomination, he's more likely to win than Hillary and, thus, a Democratic president with a Democratic congress would be more likely.
112 posted on 02/09/2008 12:32:38 PM PST by Reader of news
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
You’re right, pal. It ain’t your site. And seeing as how you can’t stand conservatives, you might try moving on to a site more to your liking. May I suggest RINOs-R-US.com.

Oh please stop this Rush/Coulter drama queen act of that I can't stand you. Look this ain't high school, so can you put aside this us against them clique mindset.

Face it, voters in the GOP primaries made their choice and McCain, especially after super tuesday, is on his way to be the GOP nominee.

Yeah, yeah, I know it is all the MSM's fault, yada, yada, yada.

IBTZ.

113 posted on 02/09/2008 12:35:01 PM PST by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
JMO, but Rush just gave Bobby Jindal the kiss of political death, with his monologue.

Bobby Jindal if you read this board, run away from the Rush/Coulter clown act, but stay true to your political ideals, which seems like a true highwire act these days.

114 posted on 02/09/2008 12:35:02 PM PST by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
This is not about "All or nothing". This is about a continuous process where the primary system is rigged to elevate Liberals in the party and splintering the conservative base so that just enough (about 35% this time) vote for the RINO.

Fine, then go back to the old system of smoky backrooms.

115 posted on 02/09/2008 12:35:06 PM PST by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
The national political conventions are the pinnacle of energy and enthusiasm for a Party's nominee. The signs, balloons, confetti, the wild cheering and excitement help to 'fire up' the traditional base and other Party faithful for the fall campaign (for both parties).

Now I could be wrong here,,,but I just CANNOT imagine a wildly cheering, enthusiastic, energized and excited 'conservative base' cheering on the acceptance speech from John McCain. Heck, he might even get booed by some (unless the RNC closely screens the delegates closely).

116 posted on 02/09/2008 12:35:29 PM PST by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi
Thank you. As I've said many time, I don't have a dog in this race, but, if I were facing the same scenario I'd have to pull for Huck.

Yanked back into reality...I'm happy to say I won't be voting for either of them.

117 posted on 02/09/2008 12:35:36 PM PST by processing please hold ( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
All things being fair I might agree with you but hillary and her gang don’t play fair, they cheat. She will cheat against Obama too, but maybe his side will recognize her dirty tricks better than our side.

Obama will be presented as a charismatic leader, the 21st century JFK. Hillary is polarizing and her negatives are not low.
118 posted on 02/09/2008 12:36:12 PM PST by Reader of news
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

Can you live with yourself knowing you just wiped out human kind? LOLOLOLOL


119 posted on 02/09/2008 12:36:38 PM PST by processing please hold ( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

I voted for Mitt..hoping he’ll be VP. ;)


120 posted on 02/09/2008 12:36:41 PM PST by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 421-434 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson