Skip to comments.
Primary Voters: Vote against McCain! Vote for deadlock! Vote anyone but McCain!
Feb 9, 2008
| Jim Robinson
Posted on 02/09/2008 11:44:24 AM PST by Jim Robinson
Folks, there still may be a slim chance to force a deadlocked convention. I'm no election math wizard, but I believe it's still mathematically possible for McCain to NOT receive the requisite number of delegates to win the nomination. But it would require a great turnout of passionate conservative voters in the remaining primary states to accomplish.
The trick would be for all remaining primary conservative voters to vote for their favorite candidate as if he were still in the race. Fred's name is still on the ballot. So is Hunter's and Romney's. Shoot, vote for Huckabee, Paul or even Giuliani if you wish. Anyone but McCain!
None of the others can possibly win, but it's still possible for McCain to lose. Let it go to the convention and force the GOP to publicly fight it out as if its very life depended on it. Because it does.
What do we have to lose? As it stands now, more and more conservatives are declaring their intentions to sit out the general. If McCain is our candidate, looks like Hillary/Obama will be our next president. Don't let it happen. Vote for any GOPer other than McCain!
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008; anyonebutmccain; elections; gopconvention; juanmccain; mccain; mcstain; ourmexicanoverlords; rino; strategy; thelarazacandidate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 421-434 next last
To: tabsternager
He was a hell of a lot better candidate than Fred Thompson, that’s for sure. Fred was a complete waste of time, and that was pretty obvious to those with eyes to see. But Romney never caught hold either. And he’s mormon, so that means he’s hiding pointy little horns under his coiffe.
101
posted on
02/09/2008 12:27:51 PM PST
by
Huck
(Buzzards gotta eat, same as worms.)
To: callisto
Give me a few minutes to format the data Good. And be sure that it's authorized programming that you are using - k?
102
posted on
02/09/2008 12:28:41 PM PST
by
don-o
(Do the RIGHT thing. Become a monthly donor. End Freepathons forever)
To: Miss Didi
And risk Huck actually becoming the nominee? I want him off the stagenow!Scenario....you have a proverbial gun to your head, you have less than a nanosecond to pull the lever, if you don't pull it the world explodes and human kind is wiped out. Who you gonna pull that lever for...Mcpain or Huck?
103
posted on
02/09/2008 12:28:48 PM PST
by
processing please hold
( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
To: SoConPubbie
Once you get over the delusion that the republican party is conservative you can see reality. And, there were candidates who were conservative or at least on some issues...
They all lost. To me that says that the republican party is not as conservative as people like to think it is.
104
posted on
02/09/2008 12:29:11 PM PST
by
misterrob
(There is no such thing as a RINO.....CINO on the other hand has meaning.)
To: libh8er; Jim Robinson
That would depend on who the opponent is. We don't always get what we want, but if Hillary is the nominee and conservatives still decide to sit it out because of a childish tantrum,
I see you are a slow learner.
You, and others, are making no headway with the "childish tantrum" nonsense.
First of all, it is a gross mis-characterization of the principled fight that CONSERVATIVEs are putting up to save their party from a McCain presidency that would doom the GOP to be the minority party for decades to come, as well as, kill the reagan coalition in the GOP.
Secondly, the more you make such childish statements, you further deepen my resolve to make sure McCain looses.
To: Allegra
Like I said, Huckabee was not my favorite. Fred was, and after he dropped out I voted for Romney on Jan 29th. If I were voting today or in the future primary race, I would vote for Huckabee over McCain. Know many folks plan on voting for their favorites who are already out of the race, but don’t think that does anything except help McCAin. Unless I am wrong in thinking that although votes for others would be counted, those still in the race who win over the other get the delegates. Do delegates go to someone who is out of the race if they happen to win a state?
To: Jim Robinson
You’re telling people to vote for candidates who have given up and already overtly or tacitly thrown their support to McCain already—Fred, Giuliani, Romney, whoever. What’s the point now? These folks’ votes would only be cast for McCain on the second ballot anyway.
This is why I asked you to choose a straw poll here on FR to have all Freepers use as a benchmark, to have us all line up behind someone conservative before primaries started. Too late for that now.
Of course, you and Rush and Ann and the rest of the what-do-we-do-now conservative media crowd can at least in the short term enjoy your sour grapes ratings and site traffic. I’m sure the audience numbers will climb as disenchanted conservatives go somewhere to vent, so rake in those higher management fees and donations while you can. When Hillary or Obama get in, they’ll reinstate the fairness doctrine and force you to subsidize DU.
107
posted on
02/09/2008 12:29:37 PM PST
by
LibertarianInExile
(McCain's just like W--except, of course, McCain served. Another 4 years of this mess? Hell, no!)
To: Jim Robinson
I voted for Fred here in Baton Rouge this AM.
To: Dubya's fan
All things being fair I might agree with you but hillary and her gang don’t play fair, they cheat. She will cheat against Obama too, but maybe his side will recognize her dirty tricks better than our side.
109
posted on
02/09/2008 12:30:38 PM PST
by
Ditter
To: processing please hold
McCain. The Huck is creepy. And he’d better not get the VP slot.
110
posted on
02/09/2008 12:30:49 PM PST
by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: processing please hold
111
posted on
02/09/2008 12:31:38 PM PST
by
Gator113
(America just traded away the possibility of a dream, for what is certain to be a nightmare.)
To: definitelynotaliberal
We started this with Ditters point about voting Obama.
Yes. If Obama wins the nomination, he's more likely to win than Hillary and, thus, a Democratic president with a Democratic congress would be more likely.
To: Jim Robinson
Youre right, pal. It aint your site. And seeing as how you cant stand conservatives, you might try moving on to a site more to your liking. May I suggest RINOs-R-US.com. Oh please stop this Rush/Coulter drama queen act of that I can't stand you. Look this ain't high school, so can you put aside this us against them clique mindset.
Face it, voters in the GOP primaries made their choice and McCain, especially after super tuesday, is on his way to be the GOP nominee.
Yeah, yeah, I know it is all the MSM's fault, yada, yada, yada.
IBTZ.
113
posted on
02/09/2008 12:35:01 PM PST
by
Dane
("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
To: Yosemitest
JMO, but Rush just gave Bobby Jindal the kiss of political death, with his monologue.
Bobby Jindal if you read this board, run away from the Rush/Coulter clown act, but stay true to your political ideals, which seems like a true highwire act these days.
114
posted on
02/09/2008 12:35:02 PM PST
by
Dane
("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
To: SoConPubbie
This is not about "All or nothing". This is about a continuous process where the primary system is rigged to elevate Liberals in the party and splintering the conservative base so that just enough (about 35% this time) vote for the RINO. Fine, then go back to the old system of smoky backrooms.
115
posted on
02/09/2008 12:35:06 PM PST
by
Dane
("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
To: Jim Robinson
The national political conventions are the pinnacle of energy and enthusiasm for a Party's nominee. The signs, balloons, confetti, the wild cheering and excitement help to 'fire up' the traditional base and other Party faithful for the fall campaign (for both parties).
Now I could be wrong here,,,but I just CANNOT imagine a wildly cheering, enthusiastic, energized and excited 'conservative base' cheering on the acceptance speech from John McCain. Heck, he might even get booed by some (unless the RNC closely screens the delegates closely).
To: Miss Didi
Thank you. As I've said many time, I don't have a dog in this race, but, if I were facing the same scenario I'd have to pull for Huck.
Yanked back into reality...I'm happy to say I won't be voting for either of them.
117
posted on
02/09/2008 12:35:36 PM PST
by
processing please hold
( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
To: Ditter
All things being fair I might agree with you but hillary and her gang dont play fair, they cheat. She will cheat against Obama too, but maybe his side will recognize her dirty tricks better than our side.
Obama will be presented as a charismatic leader, the 21st century JFK. Hillary is polarizing and her negatives are not low.
To: Gator113
Can you live with yourself knowing you just wiped out human kind? LOLOLOLOL
119
posted on
02/09/2008 12:36:38 PM PST
by
processing please hold
( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
To: processing please hold
I voted for Mitt..hoping he’ll be VP. ;)
120
posted on
02/09/2008 12:36:41 PM PST
by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 421-434 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson