Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Primary Voters: Vote against McCain! Vote for deadlock! Vote anyone but McCain!
Feb 9, 2008 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 02/09/2008 11:44:24 AM PST by Jim Robinson

Folks, there still may be a slim chance to force a deadlocked convention. I'm no election math wizard, but I believe it's still mathematically possible for McCain to NOT receive the requisite number of delegates to win the nomination. But it would require a great turnout of passionate conservative voters in the remaining primary states to accomplish.

The trick would be for all remaining primary conservative voters to vote for their favorite candidate as if he were still in the race. Fred's name is still on the ballot. So is Hunter's and Romney's. Shoot, vote for Huckabee, Paul or even Giuliani if you wish. Anyone but McCain!

None of the others can possibly win, but it's still possible for McCain to lose. Let it go to the convention and force the GOP to publicly fight it out as if its very life depended on it. Because it does.

What do we have to lose? As it stands now, more and more conservatives are declaring their intentions to sit out the general. If McCain is our candidate, looks like Hillary/Obama will be our next president. Don't let it happen. Vote for any GOPer other than McCain!


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008; anyonebutmccain; elections; gopconvention; juanmccain; mccain; mcstain; ourmexicanoverlords; rino; strategy; thelarazacandidate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 421-434 next last
To: Jim Robinson

I voted for Romney this morning in KS.

There was A LOT of support there for Huckabee and a much larger turnout than expected. Seems to me these probably were not McCain supporters since the DBM has already crowned him the Republican nominee but protest voters. A couple of people did tell me they started out Fred then switched to Romney and were now voting Huckabee.


81 posted on 02/09/2008 12:17:13 PM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Dane; Jim Robinson
Ain’t my website, but I think that Clint Eastwood is right, you all are masochists.

Translation:
We should just bend over and take whatever you and the other RINOs have planned for us.

82 posted on 02/09/2008 12:18:12 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
All or nothing is a recipe for disaster.

Sorry, heard way too much of this "Sour Grapes", "Whining", "Acting like babies" misdirection lately.

This is not about "All or nothing". This is about a continuous process where the primary system is rigged to elevate Liberals in the party and splintering the conservative base so that just enough (about 35% this time) vote for the RINO.

It is also about a candidate that only shares about 33% of what I hold important.

It is also about a candidate that has openly expressed his contempt for social conservatives by his own words and actions. He has also publicly stated that he wants to lesson the power social conservatives have over the party.

McAmneswty has declared WAR on the Reagan coalition and then has the temerity to try and cloak himself in Reagan.

And if you have not figured out yet, the "You are acting like babies" ploy will not work.

Stick to the issues, that is what we are doing.
83 posted on 02/09/2008 12:18:14 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

There is still hope of stopping John McCain. We must do all we can.


84 posted on 02/09/2008 12:18:56 PM PST by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
AnyTHING but McCain! ; )

If a ham sandwich can be indicted why can't it run for President?

85 posted on 02/09/2008 12:19:16 PM PST by TigersEye (I'm a maverick. I'm sticking with conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
I’m working on a project where we put our votes into “ESCROW” and will post details ASAP.

Please Freep Mail when you are done.

Thanks
86 posted on 02/09/2008 12:19:31 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: omega4412
If McCain gets the nomination, my guess is that the Democrats will exploit his temper. A “nuke the little girl picking daisies” ad campaign against him as LBJ did on Goldwater. Quotes from Republican senators about McCain’s temper. Pseudo-diagnosis from shrinks who have never met him — weak but enough to hint that his finger should not be on the button.

Yep, and unlike with Goldwater, when it comes to McCain they will probably be right.

87 posted on 02/09/2008 12:19:58 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth
I just listened to Huckabee’s speech from CPAC. He did give an excellent speech. If I were about to vote in a primary between Huckabee and McCain, I would vote for Huckabee.

Just saw on Fox that Kansas did just that.

Dare we hope we get someone better than McCain?

88 posted on 02/09/2008 12:20:18 PM PST by Allegra (A chicken in every pot and a pair of new socks every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Dubya's fan; Ditter

Possibly, not surely. But we started this with Ditter’s point about voting Obama.


89 posted on 02/09/2008 12:21:56 PM PST by definitelynotaliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thanks Jim. Can you take whatever steps to see the SHE is assisted in her quest for another site? She’s been a pain in the ass for years around here. FRegards
90 posted on 02/09/2008 12:22:02 PM PST by TCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

No one says you have to vote for anyone you don’t choose to. Just don’t expect people that you need in a national election to vote your guy. In the end instead of finding something in common with people who support most of what you want all parties get something they don’t want which is radical liberalism. Tell me how it is that maybe 30% of the population can win elections that define SCOTUS? Dictate national security, taxes, etc?

When I vote I look for the conservative first. If he/she isn’t there because they didn’t run then I am going to look for the one who I might be able to work with.


91 posted on 02/09/2008 12:22:33 PM PST by misterrob (There is no such thing as a RINO.....CINO on the other hand has meaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
As it stands now, more and more conservatives are declaring their intentions to sit out the general

That would depend on who the opponent is. We don't always get what we want, but if Hillary is the nominee and conservatives still decide to sit it out because of a childish tantrum, it would be no less than an act of treason. They already did that once in 2006 and a fat lot of good that did us.

92 posted on 02/09/2008 12:22:38 PM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Romney is the real thing. Nobody wrote his speech before CPAC for him; he wrote it himself, and it was great. His record in Mass. was great (I lived there and voted for him).

Coulter is right — Romney was the best conservative candidate since Reagan but too many Republican voters didn’t bother to check for themselves and instead bought the lies about his record by the liberal media (who feared he’d win) and McCain/Huckabee.

So these Republican voters now have no right to complain.


93 posted on 02/09/2008 12:22:55 PM PST by tabsternager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

And risk Huck actually becoming the nominee? I want him off the stage—now!


94 posted on 02/09/2008 12:23:35 PM PST by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

On 3/4 I am thinking of voting for Hillary as I think she is the most easily beatable. No since throwing away a good vote on the republican side that won’t make any difference. That being said I wonder which would be the lesser of evils...McCain or Hillary. In a small way I think Hillary as she will be setting her agenda via polling and looking to a second term. McCain won’t and won’t. What a messed up group of candidates...both sides...but more so on the rat side.


95 posted on 02/09/2008 12:24:07 PM PST by engrpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest
To abstain from voting gives a vote to Hitlery, who will then tell you what doctor you can see, take money out of your pay check for “health insurance” and make you wait at least six months for elective surgery. Just ask a Canadian about Socialized Medicine.

Not going to play the "Lessor of Two Evils" game anymore.

Wouldn't be prudent! No Sir!

Did that with Arnold, and everyone can see what a mess he is.

I will not vote for John "Traitor to the Conservative Cause" McAmnesty.
96 posted on 02/09/2008 12:24:14 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I talked to more than a few women who were rather taken with Fred.


97 posted on 02/09/2008 12:24:29 PM PST by misterrob (There is no such thing as a RINO.....CINO on the other hand has meaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Nice try. But, you’re locking the barn door and the cows have done run off.

We did not get in this mess just off this election cycle. Like it or don’t, but our most recent Republican presidents have been far from conservatives of the brand that we hope for. The party has moved left and McCain is a good fit.

I already voted (for Mitt - Huckabee won Tennessee) and I do hope that a brokered convention might happen and someone besides McCain get the nod. If he does, may once again swallow the same spit as I have done several times in the past when voting


98 posted on 02/09/2008 12:25:50 PM PST by don-o (Do the RIGHT thing. Become a monthly donor. End Freepathons forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane; Jim Robinson
I don't get it.

It's not about who conservatives want, it's about who the whole country wants that wins the presidency.

Bush (himself not conservative enough to many here) barely won both elections (in fact didn't Gore even get more of the popular vote?).

Does anybody here think the country's become more conservative since?

Whatever candidate the republicans run, he'd better be more to the left of what people here are comfortable with, or we'll end up with Clinton or Obama.

How nuts can anyone here be to want one of those two elected?

99 posted on 02/09/2008 12:27:20 PM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tabsternager
McCain is the one who gave Soros actual real political influence.

John McCain Gets Soros Cash

McCain/Soros by Rabbi Areyh Spero

Soros' "Reform" (an article about Soros‘ instrumental hand in McCain/Feingold)

Do you want to know why we lost in 2006? McCain/Feingold. Do you think McCain will actually win in Nov? Not on your Soros, pal.

Stop the McCain/Soros trashing of America!

100 posted on 02/09/2008 12:27:48 PM PST by TigersEye (I'm a maverick. I'm sticking with conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 421-434 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson