Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Thompson Backs McCain
Washington Post ^ | 2/8/08 | Michael D. Shear

Posted on 02/08/2008 6:53:23 PM PST by NoGrayZone

Fred Thompson, the one-time Republican presidential candidate, endorsed Sen. John McCain Friday, calling on the party to "close ranks" behind the presumed nominee

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; conservatives; elections; endorse; fredthompson; juanmccain; mccain; mcmexico; mcstain; ourmexicanoverlords; rinostampede; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720721-740741-760 ... 1,541-1,548 next last
To: Gondring

Try being a Texan, being dismayed by the initial GOP lineup, then getting behind Fred, then Romney, and still we Texans, with a Mar. 4 primary, will only see on our R ballot McCain.


721 posted on 02/08/2008 10:54:15 PM PST by txhurl (Don't sausage me, bro!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 710 | View Replies]

To: egginanest

...Oh yes, they have files on her on her also. Plus have you noticed all the support that Obama is getting? On Monday in Hartford, the capital of my homestate, CT, there was a rally at the local arena, up to 17,000 people, it even overflowed into the hall. Standing room bigtime. Like as I have said, this could be 1960 all over again bigtime. In other words, another Kennedy vs. Nixon race.


722 posted on 02/08/2008 10:55:58 PM PST by Biggirl (A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation, with 4 cats in my life as proof. =^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 712 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Huck is finished thank God. As much as I loved trashing him for sport, the party is over. He’s dead and doesn’t realize that he is not Jesus and will not resurrect in 3 days.

I’ll vote for Paul as a 3rd party just to make a point. If I actually thought he could win I wouldn’t.

It reminds me of that old Eddie Murphy skit from 1984...a bunch of rednecks get drunk in the bar and decide to walk into the voting booth and vote for Jesse Jackson as a joke....

“heee, heee, heeee (hiccup)...I’m gonna vote for Jesse Jackson”

Then they wake up the next morning hungover and go “What the heck do you mean he won????”


723 posted on 02/08/2008 10:56:13 PM PST by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 703 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Jim Robinson; Spiff; Reaganesque; elizabetty; bethtopaz; gpapa; Tennessee Nana; ...
smile!:)


Another nice mess you Fredheads got us Freepers in! click


724 posted on 02/08/2008 10:56:13 PM PST by restornu (...how many are missing from earth taken to another planet to do slave labor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Jim Robinson; Spiff; Reaganesque; elizabetty; bethtopaz; gpapa; Tennessee Nana; ...
smile!:)


725 posted on 02/08/2008 10:57:09 PM PST by restornu (...how many are missing from earth taken to another planet to do slave labor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
It escapes me why any soul could possibly be surprised by this. Thompson and McCain were joined at the hip in the Senate, and Fred carried the water for McCain-Feingold more than any other single individual. Both Feingold and McCain’s chief of staff publicly credited Thompson with being the prime mover of the bill through the Congress.

You ain't the only one who can't figure out why this surprises anyone. Denial and blinders, I guess.

726 posted on 02/08/2008 10:57:10 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Hattie

...Or more likely, if it is Obama like 1960, JFK vs. R. Nixon.


727 posted on 02/08/2008 10:57:19 PM PST by Biggirl (A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation, with 4 cats in my life as proof. =^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 719 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Absolutely. I would never disrespect my nana.


728 posted on 02/08/2008 10:57:20 PM PST by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 717 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
It sends a pro-republican message

Yeah - that drum beat in 2006 gave us Reid and Pelosi - yeah, THAT worked out well.

729 posted on 02/08/2008 10:57:22 PM PST by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
"Now go back to telling me why losing in 2006 was going to set us up for a big win in 2008."

No, losing in 2006 set us up for losing in 2008 and 2010 and 2012...... maybe by 2016 we'll be ready for the next Reagan Revolution...... or maybe not.....
730 posted on 02/08/2008 10:57:38 PM PST by Enchante (Hillary Clinton: As a little girl near Chicago I always dreamed of the NY Giants in the SuperBowl!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 522 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

My focus is that we have two candidates running in the presidential race for the GOP, and Mike Huckabee is far better than John McCain. So, I will do all that I can to support Huckabee.

Huckabee is strongly pro-life, and strong about protecting our 2nd amendment rights:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1967535/posts

A week ago, I called Dr. Richard Land’s radio show to say that not only did Senator McCain support human embryonic stem cell research, but according to the late Congressman Henry Hyde, John McCain wanted to WEAKEN the pro-life plank of the Republican Party platform, so he is different behind the scenes, than the picture he tries to portray to us.

Here’s where I got my information from:

“Hyde, who has criticized McCain for advocating weakening of the Republican Party’s pro-life platform plank.

Pro-abortion leaders also see a big difference. Following McCain’s win in the New Hampshire primary, the Republican Pro-Choice Coalition said that based on exit polls, “pro-choice Republicans overwhelmingly preferred McCain above all the other candidates.”’

excerpt from: http://www.peopleforlife.org/mccainthreatensprolife.html

And here’s why Duncan Hunter endorsed Huckabee out of the remaining candidates:

http://issuesthatmatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/hunter-endorses-huckabee/#comment-276


731 posted on 02/08/2008 10:58:29 PM PST by Sun (Duncan Hunter:pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Oh give it a rest! Fred was deadly serious about his run for the Presidency. He just didn’t play the silly games that apparently too many GOP voters wanted to see. They weren’t interested in substance this time around, even though they’ve been claiming for years that it was what they truly wanted in a candidate. They allowed themselves to be led by the MSM and some in the alleged conservative media into thinking that since he didn’t come out and do the old soft shoe that he really didn’t want to be President.


732 posted on 02/08/2008 10:58:46 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

You forgot Mary Matlin, Dick Cheney’s girl, was the leader for Fred Thompson. LOL They were worried about Mitt. Boxed him in pretty good. You have to give them credit though, I never would have thought of a preacher.


733 posted on 02/08/2008 10:59:30 PM PST by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies]

To: txflake

Why is Dr. Paul being taken off? He was on the absentee ballots!


734 posted on 02/08/2008 10:59:33 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 721 | View Replies]

To: txflake

Texas, you got shafted bigtime!


735 posted on 02/08/2008 10:59:33 PM PST by Biggirl (A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation, with 4 cats in my life as proof. =^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 721 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

That is my prediction, Ron Paul will go 3rd party bigtime just to attract all the unhappy conservitives.


736 posted on 02/08/2008 11:01:18 PM PST by Biggirl (A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation, with 4 cats in my life as proof. =^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 723 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

Sure he was. You could just feel the enthusiasm oozing from his pores. /s


737 posted on 02/08/2008 11:01:47 PM PST by TigersEye (I'm a maverick. I'm sticking with conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 732 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Love that picture.

That is what I have been feeling the last few days about some of the FR threads and posts.


738 posted on 02/08/2008 11:02:45 PM PST by Biggirl (A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation, with 4 cats in my life as proof. =^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 714 | View Replies]

To: Hattie

They played it good.


739 posted on 02/08/2008 11:03:04 PM PST by TigersEye (I'm a maverick. I'm sticking with conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 733 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
No, losing in 2006 set us up for losing in 2008 and 2010 and 2012...... maybe by 2016 we'll be ready for the next Reagan Revolution...... or maybe not.....

Exactly. Facing reality involves admitting a defeat is a defeat. Claiming that a win for the socialists is somehow a good thing is delusional thinking.

If anything should be clear by the excitement over Obama or the first female president it's that we've been bitching and whining about the liberals in our schools and our media but not DOING anything about it. We think "Well, at least I'm cranky about the propaganda pushed on my kids, that's SOMEthing."

No, it's not. And letting the Dems have ANOTHER 'strategic" win is not winning--it's losing.

We will never have a perfect conservative candidate. We can only play the hand we're dealt--and sometimes, like now, that's a very bad hand. But just folding and letting the other guy collect the pot isn't a win, no matter how one wants to claim it is such.

740 posted on 02/08/2008 11:03:12 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Six SCOTUS justices will be 70 or older in January of next year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 730 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720721-740741-760 ... 1,541-1,548 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson