Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darkwolf377
"Now go back to telling me why losing in 2006 was going to set us up for a big win in 2008."

No, losing in 2006 set us up for losing in 2008 and 2010 and 2012...... maybe by 2016 we'll be ready for the next Reagan Revolution...... or maybe not.....
730 posted on 02/08/2008 10:57:38 PM PST by Enchante (Hillary Clinton: As a little girl near Chicago I always dreamed of the NY Giants in the SuperBowl!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 522 | View Replies ]


To: Enchante
No, losing in 2006 set us up for losing in 2008 and 2010 and 2012...... maybe by 2016 we'll be ready for the next Reagan Revolution...... or maybe not.....

Exactly. Facing reality involves admitting a defeat is a defeat. Claiming that a win for the socialists is somehow a good thing is delusional thinking.

If anything should be clear by the excitement over Obama or the first female president it's that we've been bitching and whining about the liberals in our schools and our media but not DOING anything about it. We think "Well, at least I'm cranky about the propaganda pushed on my kids, that's SOMEthing."

No, it's not. And letting the Dems have ANOTHER 'strategic" win is not winning--it's losing.

We will never have a perfect conservative candidate. We can only play the hand we're dealt--and sometimes, like now, that's a very bad hand. But just folding and letting the other guy collect the pot isn't a win, no matter how one wants to claim it is such.

740 posted on 02/08/2008 11:03:12 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Six SCOTUS justices will be 70 or older in January of next year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 730 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson