Skip to comments.
ANN COULTER Will Campaign For Hillary Clinton
Hannity and Colmes ^
| January 31, 2008
| Ann Coulter
Posted on 01/31/2008 9:29:37 PM PST by Yosemitest
ANN COULTER Will Campain For Hillary Clinton
Click on the photo to go to "youtube.com" to listen and watch it for yourself.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; conservatives4obama; elections; hillary; jumpedshark; lethillarywin; loveyouannie; mccain; republican; traitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 701-714 next last
To: Earthdweller; All
Type in Romneytruthfile in the serch engine on the top of the forum page if you dare...
To: Yosemitest
Well, it’s looking like that minority is going to get smaller, considering how flamingly liberal the Republican party has become.
I’m surprised they haven’t moved their headquarters to San Francisco yet...
462
posted on
02/01/2008 8:11:57 AM PST
by
gogogodzilla
(Live free or die!)
To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
She lived with a liberal. You take this media circus as serious political discussion?
Hard to imagine anybody typing those two sentences and not catching the irony before hitting the "post" button.
bwahahaha... that is just classic.
463
posted on
02/01/2008 8:16:13 AM PST
by
cgk
(I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
To: Yosemitest
She endorsed Hillary the same way Rush endorsed Clinton for about an hour in 96... I can’t believe people fell for it..
464
posted on
02/01/2008 8:19:12 AM PST
by
mnehring
(Glenfiddich/Macallan 08)
To: Irish Eyes
That it was satire was my hope too. I still don’t know.
Things are getting curiouser and curiouser in this election
cycle!
465
posted on
02/01/2008 8:21:41 AM PST
by
luvie
(“Life is a precious gift from God, and we should embrace it.” \:D/)
To: Froufrou
Couter logic of hate: (Wiki) On March 5, 2007, Coulter appeared on Hannity and Colmes and said, “[f]aggot isn’t offensive to gays; it has nothing to do with gays. It’s a schoolyard taunt meaning ‘wuss’”.[
466
posted on
02/01/2008 8:23:07 AM PST
by
meandog
(Please pray for future President McCain--day minus 333 and counting! <b>Vote Mitt=Get Billary!))
To: tallyhoe
I never saw to many cowboys from New Jersey!
Google "cowtown rodeo" sometime. There are even a couple good country music radio stations round our patch.
467
posted on
02/01/2008 8:24:23 AM PST
by
Antoninus
(The other guys s#ck so I'm stuck with Huck!)
To: cgk
At least one of my responses to the guy wasn’t removed... yet.
To: Yosemitest; notbuyingit2
469
posted on
02/01/2008 8:27:50 AM PST
by
kinsman redeemer
(The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
To: savedbygrace
Look, as long as we have 41 reliable votes in the Senate, we can block nearly everything a Prezdent Hillary would want to do. But, with a pubbie Prez, those 41+ would be hard pressed to take the same stands and draw the same lines in the sand.
I've made exactly that point--which is why I will not vote for Romney if he's the GOP nominee. That said, I would never, ever pull the lever for a Democrat marxist like Hillbama. I'll go 3rd party.
Ann could have said that and had the same strategic effect. She's either serious about campaigning for Hillary or just trying to grab some headlines by throwing bombs.
470
posted on
02/01/2008 8:28:12 AM PST
by
Antoninus
(The other guys s#ck so I'm stuck with Huck!)
To: Grunthor
“McAmnesty would rather we be nuked than to use water boarding on a terrorist.”
that is about the ONLY concern I have as far as national security and McCain. He has a good record on military and war on terror stuff.
He is light years ahead of Hilda-bama for sure.
That is the reality.
Yes, it sucks. McAmnesty sucks in almost ALL other ways.
But getting nuked is of a slight concern to me.
Bubba set us up very well for 9-11. I dont want to see history repeat itself.
We have such wonderful choices don’t we?
To: Mean Maryjean
Heard BOR yesterday say that he thought McManiac would pick Romney for VEEP because Romney would be good for raising money, which will be very challenging for McManiac to do. He also added Rudy in the mix there somewhere...stay tuned.
McCain MUST pick someone from the south, in my opinion, or else he can't win.
If he picks Flip, I think a serious 3rd party candidate with some financial wearwithall has a shot at taking it.
472
posted on
02/01/2008 8:29:29 AM PST
by
Antoninus
(The other guys s#ck so I'm stuck with Huck!)
To: VictoryGal
473
posted on
02/01/2008 8:34:13 AM PST
by
Antoninus
(The other guys s#ck so I'm stuck with Huck!)
To: Earthdweller
What in the hell are you talking about? Please explain why you think Romney will go after your freedom? Geesh, some people should not be allowed to vote.
To: thomasjefferson1215
A lot of “republicans” are name calling “conservatives” on this thread. This place is turning into DU. People should read Peggy Noonan’s collumn.
475
posted on
02/01/2008 8:37:58 AM PST
by
omega4179
(Romney-my 4th choice)
To: Yosemitest
Coulter is making the point in the strongest possible terms that McCain should not be the GOP nominee.
Anyone who was not brain-dead during the 90s knows you don't want the Clintons anywhere near the White House, unless of course you think Republicans should spend another 40-year vacation wandering in the wilderness while Dems install another New Deal-Fair Deal-Great Frontier-Great Society-Great Disaster program and consolidate their power.
Meanwhile, allowing the Supreme Court to go Left for the next 40 years while Dems put a lock on Congress insures that no conservative policies will be enacted probably in your lifetime. Kiss all your pet principles goodbye.
There will be no anti-Clinton bounceback for conservatives this time. Dems have tilted the playing field in nearly every major institution and conservatives will be powerless to prevent a tyranny of absolute power, including curbs on free speech that will affect the Internet and every Freeper. Let's not be the Stupid Party in 2008.
You need to vote to insure McCain is not the nominee, to regain control of Congress, and to defeat Hillary. It's independents and Democrats with the connivance of the liberal press who have given McCain, our "dirty tricks charlatan," his lead and will crush him as soon as he gets the nomination. Now he will have to compete in states that do not allow cross-over voting. This is important.
.
476
posted on
02/01/2008 8:39:40 AM PST
by
OESY
To: dinoparty
“So, please, can we all agree that McCain is not the best nominee, but he is definitely better than Clinton, and a vote for McCain will not be seen as a showing of support, but rather as an anti-Hillary vote?”
With respect, no we can’t all agree on this one. Your premise is that Sen. McCain would be less of a disaster for conservatives than Sen. Clinton would be. Myself and many, many, other conservatives would disagree with you on this. I personally see little meaningful difference in the political views of either candidate.
Perhaps what we could agree on instead is that GOP relies upon the threat of the latest boogeyman of the left to browbeat conservatives into voting for their candidate. What’s different this year is that many conservatives are loudly rejecting the probable GOP nominee as being any better of a choice.
477
posted on
02/01/2008 8:42:14 AM PST
by
RKBA Democrat
(Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
To: Antoninus
It’s you. You need to start paying psychiatrist hazardous duty cash.
478
posted on
02/01/2008 8:43:26 AM PST
by
SlayerOfBunnies
(An Indian friend of mine wishes to remind everyone... Indians <> muslims)
To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
Ah yes. The old default for those who can’t stand ‘serious political discussion”: hit abuse when confronted with truth.
Nice work! Now let the petty little beings simper alone. Your wit & wisdom is wasted on the likes of them.
479
posted on
02/01/2008 8:44:19 AM PST
by
cgk
(I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
To: Antoninus; Jim Robinson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 701-714 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson