Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ANN COULTER Will Campaign For Hillary Clinton
Hannity and Colmes ^ | January 31, 2008 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 01/31/2008 9:29:37 PM PST by Yosemitest

ANN COULTER Will Campain For Hillary Clinton


Click on the photo to go to "youtube.com" to listen and watch it for yourself.


(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; conservatives4obama; elections; hillary; jumpedshark; lethillarywin; loveyouannie; mccain; republican; traitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 701-714 next last
To: Earthdweller; All

Type in Romneytruthfile in the serch engine on the top of the forum page if you dare...


461 posted on 02/01/2008 8:10:01 AM PST by Earthdweller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Well, it’s looking like that minority is going to get smaller, considering how flamingly liberal the Republican party has become.

I’m surprised they haven’t moved their headquarters to San Francisco yet...


462 posted on 02/01/2008 8:11:57 AM PST by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
She lived with a liberal.

You take this media circus as serious political discussion?

Hard to imagine anybody typing those two sentences and not catching the irony before hitting the "post" button.


bwahahaha... that is just classic.
463 posted on 02/01/2008 8:16:13 AM PST by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
She endorsed Hillary the same way Rush endorsed Clinton for about an hour in 96... I can’t believe people fell for it..
464 posted on 02/01/2008 8:19:12 AM PST by mnehring (Glenfiddich/Macallan 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irish Eyes

That it was satire was my hope too. I still don’t know.

Things are getting curiouser and curiouser in this election
cycle!


465 posted on 02/01/2008 8:21:41 AM PST by luvie (“Life is a precious gift from God, and we should embrace it.” \:D/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Couter logic of hate: (Wiki) On March 5, 2007, Coulter appeared on Hannity and Colmes and said, “[f]aggot isn’t offensive to gays; it has nothing to do with gays. It’s a schoolyard taunt meaning ‘wuss’”.[


466 posted on 02/01/2008 8:23:07 AM PST by meandog (Please pray for future President McCain--day minus 333 and counting! <b>Vote Mitt=Get Billary!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: tallyhoe
I never saw to many cowboys from New Jersey!

Google "cowtown rodeo" sometime. There are even a couple good country music radio stations round our patch.
467 posted on 02/01/2008 8:24:23 AM PST by Antoninus (The other guys s#ck so I'm stuck with Huck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: cgk

At least one of my responses to the guy wasn’t removed... yet.


468 posted on 02/01/2008 8:27:47 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard ("I didn't raise taxes. I raised hope" - The Huckster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest; notbuyingit2

I agree.


469 posted on 02/01/2008 8:27:50 AM PST by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
Look, as long as we have 41 reliable votes in the Senate, we can block nearly everything a Prezdent Hillary would want to do. But, with a pubbie Prez, those 41+ would be hard pressed to take the same stands and draw the same lines in the sand.

I've made exactly that point--which is why I will not vote for Romney if he's the GOP nominee. That said, I would never, ever pull the lever for a Democrat marxist like Hillbama. I'll go 3rd party.

Ann could have said that and had the same strategic effect. She's either serious about campaigning for Hillary or just trying to grab some headlines by throwing bombs.
470 posted on 02/01/2008 8:28:12 AM PST by Antoninus (The other guys s#ck so I'm stuck with Huck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

“McAmnesty would rather we be nuked than to use water boarding on a terrorist.”

that is about the ONLY concern I have as far as national security and McCain. He has a good record on military and war on terror stuff.

He is light years ahead of Hilda-bama for sure.

That is the reality.

Yes, it sucks. McAmnesty sucks in almost ALL other ways.

But getting nuked is of a slight concern to me.

Bubba set us up very well for 9-11. I dont want to see history repeat itself.

We have such wonderful choices don’t we?


471 posted on 02/01/2008 8:28:51 AM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Mean Maryjean
Heard BOR yesterday say that he thought McManiac would pick Romney for VEEP because Romney would be good for raising money, which will be very challenging for McManiac to do. He also added Rudy in the mix there somewhere...stay tuned.

McCain MUST pick someone from the south, in my opinion, or else he can't win.

If he picks Flip, I think a serious 3rd party candidate with some financial wearwithall has a shot at taking it.
472 posted on 02/01/2008 8:29:29 AM PST by Antoninus (The other guys s#ck so I'm stuck with Huck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal
Beware the government-media complex, sheeple.

Yep. Jives perfectly with my theory...

Why media conservatives hate John McCain
473 posted on 02/01/2008 8:34:13 AM PST by Antoninus (The other guys s#ck so I'm stuck with Huck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

What in the hell are you talking about? Please explain why you think Romney will go after your freedom? Geesh, some people should not be allowed to vote.


474 posted on 02/01/2008 8:36:42 AM PST by AllseeingEye33 (ney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: thomasjefferson1215

A lot of “republicans” are name calling “conservatives” on this thread. This place is turning into DU. People should read Peggy Noonan’s collumn.


475 posted on 02/01/2008 8:37:58 AM PST by omega4179 (Romney-my 4th choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
Coulter is making the point in the strongest possible terms that McCain should not be the GOP nominee.

Anyone who was not brain-dead during the 90s knows you don't want the Clintons anywhere near the White House, unless of course you think Republicans should spend another 40-year vacation wandering in the wilderness while Dems install another New Deal-Fair Deal-Great Frontier-Great Society-Great Disaster program and consolidate their power.

Meanwhile, allowing the Supreme Court to go Left for the next 40 years while Dems put a lock on Congress insures that no conservative policies will be enacted probably in your lifetime. Kiss all your pet principles goodbye.

There will be no anti-Clinton bounceback for conservatives this time. Dems have tilted the playing field in nearly every major institution and conservatives will be powerless to prevent a tyranny of absolute power, including curbs on free speech that will affect the Internet and every Freeper. Let's not be the Stupid Party in 2008.

You need to vote to insure McCain is not the nominee, to regain control of Congress, and to defeat Hillary. It's independents and Democrats with the connivance of the liberal press who have given McCain, our "dirty tricks charlatan," his lead and will crush him as soon as he gets the nomination. Now he will have to compete in states that do not allow cross-over voting. This is important.

.

476 posted on 02/01/2008 8:39:40 AM PST by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty

“So, please, can we all agree that McCain is not the best nominee, but he is definitely better than Clinton, and a vote for McCain will not be seen as a showing of support, but rather as an anti-Hillary vote?”

With respect, no we can’t all agree on this one. Your premise is that Sen. McCain would be less of a disaster for conservatives than Sen. Clinton would be. Myself and many, many, other conservatives would disagree with you on this. I personally see little meaningful difference in the political views of either candidate.

Perhaps what we could agree on instead is that GOP relies upon the threat of the latest boogeyman of the left to browbeat conservatives into voting for their candidate. What’s different this year is that many conservatives are loudly rejecting the probable GOP nominee as being any better of a choice.


477 posted on 02/01/2008 8:42:14 AM PST by RKBA Democrat (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

It’s you. You need to start paying psychiatrist hazardous duty cash.


478 posted on 02/01/2008 8:43:26 AM PST by SlayerOfBunnies (An Indian friend of mine wishes to remind everyone... Indians <> muslims)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

Ah yes. The old default for those who can’t stand ‘serious political discussion”: hit abuse when confronted with truth.

Nice work! Now let the petty little beings simper alone. Your wit & wisdom is wasted on the likes of them.


479 posted on 02/01/2008 8:44:19 AM PST by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus; Jim Robinson
Is Jim Robinson part of this unjust anti-McCain crusade?

John McCain, you treasonous bastard, I challenge you or any of your traitorous cohorts...

480 posted on 02/01/2008 8:45:18 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard ("I didn't raise taxes. I raised hope" - The Huckster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 701-714 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson