Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rohrabacher, Hunter call for agents' pardon
Wash Times ^ | 1/17/08 | Jerry Seper

Posted on 01/17/2008 11:37:31 PM PST by pissant

Two California Republican congressmen yesterday called on President Bush to pardon two former U.S. Border patrol agents sent to prison a year ago this week for shooting a drug-smuggling suspect in the buttocks as he fled back into Mexico.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher accused Mr. Bush of being "arrogant and heartless" for refusing to pardon or commute the sentences of former agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean, who were ordered last January to serve 11- and 12-year prison sentences, respectively.

He said they had spent the past year in solitary confinement "suffering conditions worse than detainees at Guantanamo Bay.

"It has been a year since Border Agents Ramos and Compean entered prison," Mr. Rohrabacher said. "This marks a year of shame for President Bush, who has been fully aware of the details of this blatant miscarriage of justice and chosen to do absolutely nothing about it.

"The president has shown us his arrogant and heartless side by permitting the wrongful incarceration of Ramos and Compean to continue," he said.

Rep. Duncan Hunter, a Republican presidential candidate who in- troduced a still-pending bill last year to pardon the agents, said Congress and the American people have "repeatedly expressed their outrage that such an injustice has been allowed to occur."

"These agents were convicted solely on the testimony of the drug dealer, who has since been indicted on federal drug charges for running drugs into the United States while serving as a federal witness," Mr. Hunter said. "Most disturbingly, he did so with border crossing cards he obtained for his cooperation."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; agents; aliens; border; compean; duncanhunter; immigrantlist; immigration; ramos; seper; septer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-210 next last
To: Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit

Is 12 years long enough for you?


141 posted on 01/18/2008 7:34:40 PM PST by airborne (Proud to be a conservative! Proud to support Duncan Hunter for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant
There'll be a pardon-fest later this year alright, rivaling BillyJeff's in late 2000.

But unfortunately Ramos and Compean won't be on the list.

Bush pardons drug dealers, not those who shoot them in self defense.

142 posted on 01/18/2008 7:46:10 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjaneangels@aolcom

“They did know that the van came into this country illegally. The van set off an alarm as it crossed into this country.”

You haven’t even bothered to read the transcripts, have you.


143 posted on 01/18/2008 7:46:50 PM PST by Bob J ("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one is striking at it's root.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: airborne
I bet if they converted to Islam they’d get red carpet treatment!

They might even get to be the guests of honor at the next White House Ramadan dinner.

144 posted on 01/18/2008 7:47:46 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: mjaneangels@aolcom

Okay. How bout we agree when we say “pelvis” we mean “pelvic bone”?


145 posted on 01/18/2008 7:48:38 PM PST by Bob J ("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one is striking at it's root.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: mjaneangels@aolcom

“Do you know how our court system works? It is not the job of the legislature to determine criminal sentences. That is the job of the courts.”

Hmmm. So you’re saying of congress were to pass a law saying a 10 year mandatory sentence was required of anyone convicted of using a firearm during the commission of a felony, that would be unconstitutional or a violation of the separation of powers?


146 posted on 01/18/2008 7:52:02 PM PST by Bob J ("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one is striking at it's root.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Amazing post...lol


147 posted on 01/18/2008 7:54:58 PM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

What is shotpolitics FR username?

/sarc, or is it?


148 posted on 01/18/2008 8:22:28 PM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: mjaneangels@aolcom

They did know that the van came into this country illegally. The van set off an alarm as it crossed into this country.


Could you tell us what volume, page and line number this testimony is within the trial transcript?..... I’d like to read it.


149 posted on 01/18/2008 8:29:09 PM PST by deport (Tomorrow.... South Carolina -- 17 days Super Tuesday -- [ Meanwhile:-- Cue Spooky Music--])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

“Hmmm. So you’re saying of congress were to pass a law saying a 10 year mandatory sentence was required of anyone convicted of using a firearm during the commission of a felony, that would be unconstitutional or a violation of the separation of powers?”

No. I am saying that any new law would still have to go through the courts because the courts are who determine sentencing in criminal cases. The new law can say what you suggested it say, but Ramos and Compean would still have to go back to court. Not only that, but any future cases would still be decided by the court as to what the intention of the law was and sentence according to their interpretation.

Of course if the judges have any reading comprehension skills they will come to the same conclusion as to the interpretation and will sentence accordingly.


150 posted on 01/18/2008 8:50:12 PM PST by mjaneangels@aolcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Bob J; Cyropaedia
All I’m asking, and NO ONE is answering, is why hasn’t anyone taken the easiest and quickest route to solve this dilemma?

Bull crap. We answered, we challenged, you ducked.

151 posted on 01/18/2008 9:07:41 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

And an attempted “cover up” while their damn supervisors were there as they picked up casings. AN administrative fine at best.

Too bad they did not flatline the druggie. Would have saved them from Sutton and his kneepadders.


152 posted on 01/18/2008 9:09:10 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: DaGman

WHich is an even bigger mystery, since their supervisors were there after the incident.

That crime, cover up, if it even ocurred, was a slap on teh wrist. Instead some dumb prick of a prosecutor decided to be the first in the country to try to use a law that adds 10 years to a sentence. Complete and utter misapplication.


153 posted on 01/18/2008 9:12:31 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: pissant; Bob J; Congressman Billybob; Cyropaedia
it is not a bad idea to revisit that law and put in more specificity and a retroactive component

The problem is, the constitution prohibits ex-post facto law. You can't make it retroactive--at least no one has provided any rationale how to get around that. BobJ claims that BillyBob told him in a private freepmail it can be done by "undeclaring" the law. But CBB he did not respond to several pings asking him to address what seem like obvious limitations (how can you "undeclare" the law for Ramos and Compean and not the others convicted under the same law? Yet BobJ continues to spam the threads stating authoritatively (with no support) that it can happen if only Hunter or someone else writes a bill.

154 posted on 01/18/2008 9:14:48 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

It’s called blowing smoke. Out his arse.


155 posted on 01/18/2008 9:16:14 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Giuliani firm tied to monitoring developer

Just wait til they start reporting on his interests in alternative energy firms that will benefit from his space-program-like spending spree!

156 posted on 01/18/2008 9:17:58 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
I read the entire transcripts and the doctor on the stand said it entered his left buttock, severed his urethra, franctured his pelvis and then entered and lodged in his right thigh.

LOL! You just keep makin this stuff up, doncha? Fractured his pelvis? NOT! As to "lodged," are you familiar with the meaning of palpable?

12 A. Surgically, we made an incision over the area where you
13 could palpate the bullet -- it was very superficial -- and
14 removed it.



157 posted on 01/18/2008 9:39:16 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: mjaneangels@aolcom; Bob J
“One was even quoted saying “It’s sad when the testimony of a drug mule is more believeable than that of the officers.””

I thought you said the jury hardly paid attention to what OAD said?

I'd love to see sources for both. I won't hold my breath.

158 posted on 01/18/2008 9:40:41 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Bob J; flattorney
One more thing, don’t even think about going after me. This thread along with your ABOUT PAGE is being sent to my litigation attorney who will be getting off a nice note to your law firm.

I suggest you visit your doctor instead. ;-)

159 posted on 01/18/2008 9:42:20 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: mjaneangels@aolcom
Someone who testified at the trial referred to the pelvic bone being shattered, I believe he was referring to the left hip bone.

Actually, the bullet fractured the right pubic symphysis and severed his urethra. "Shattered" was not part of the testimony--that was the prosecutors inflated claims in her opening statement (among many lies) that the bullet "shattered the pelvic bone." No matter, it was a nasty injury.

160 posted on 01/18/2008 9:51:34 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-210 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson