Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When Ron Paul Lunatics Attack (Ron Paul Lunatics Attack Hannity)
fimc.net via Hannity.com ^

Posted on 01/07/2008 1:57:23 PM PST by mnehring

Ron Paul Lunatics

Sean returns to his hotel after crazy Ron Paul protesters rallied outside of a restaurant he was visiting in Manchester, New Hampshire.

Video Link: http://zshn.fimc.net//Article.asp?id=543226

--my comments--

According to Ron Paul forums, about 200 Paul supporters were part of this attack on Sean. They claim they were only throwing snowballs but the videos make it clear they were throwing bottles and other items other than snowballs.

Warning, foul language by Paul supporters.


TOPICS: Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: brownshirts; nh2008; punks; ronpaul; sa; talkradio; therapy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 701-706 next last
To: nicmarlo

His voting on the illegal immigration is usually taken out of context as he votes against numerous bills attached to spending increases that he otherwise would vote for (like for example AuntB listed he voted against a wall a few years ago but fails to mention he voted for it this year, I haven’t looked into it much but I’m sure there was more attached to it both times).


561 posted on 01/08/2008 8:39:17 AM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

SJackson, do you happen to be listening to Boortz? Apparently he is an eye witness and agrees with the things being thrown and lots of cursing account. I am getting this second hand though, I would like to find someone who is actually hearing him on the radio now.


562 posted on 01/08/2008 8:39:31 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Well....I’d like to have some better video/audio then, as there was absolutely no sign of any kind of obscenities being made, sounds of glass breaking, or anything thing being thrown at him.

As was earlier observed, though I dislike Hannity, I do believe he would ensure that the woman standing in close proximity to him would have been shielded from harm by him or by his direction and she would have been pulled to safety into the building ahead of him.

That was also not observed on the video....just his “casual” walk into the building, along with his smile.


563 posted on 01/08/2008 8:39:37 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Navy Fighter Jets Crash in Persian Gulf (All Pilots Ejected Safely)" has 65 posts while this gay-ass thread is approaching 600.

"Welcome to FreeRepublic 2008!"

Such a sad commentary on the state of things. Both here and across America.

564 posted on 01/08/2008 8:40:05 AM PST by airborne (Proud to be a conservative! Proud to support Duncan Hunter for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

I am no Hannity fan either by the way.


565 posted on 01/08/2008 8:40:56 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: rb22982
His voting on the illegal immigration is usually taken out of context as he votes against numerous bills attached to spending increases

That is a possibility; however, it appears that he has often voted against bills proposed by conservative Duncan Hunter and in favor of or sponsorship of bills proposed by, for example, Loretta Sanchez, who only obtained her seat through an illegal election with illegals voting....that is my memory, as I had only recently moved away from So.Cal. at the time a good conservative man (B. Dornan) was thereby ousted.

566 posted on 01/08/2008 8:43:14 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Well, he’d definitely eliminate any and all benefits immediately regardless. You are right though that Hunter is a far better presidential candidate than Paul, but Paul’s record on some of these conservative sites is distorted by he votes against them because they aren’t conservative enough.


567 posted on 01/08/2008 8:45:01 AM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: All
They remind me of the brownshirts I read about that would attack the opposition back in pre-war Germany.
And they wonder why Ron Paul isn’t taken seriously.
I guess the “love revolution” means assault. Sounds Clintonian if you ask me.
568 posted on 01/08/2008 8:46:18 AM PST by newnhdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
If you agree “100%”, then it would not make a fly-fart of difference if the Clinton or Carter administrations ever existed. Yes, Clinton and Carter did things to exacerbate issues and actually bring the mullahs to power in Iran, but that is not the issue. The real and sole issue is that this religion is violent and jealous of all others, in the extreme. Their hunger for power knows no end and their respect for human beings (especially women!) is zero. Their religion was initially spread by violence, intimidation and mob brutality. That has not changed since it began.

Dr. Paul willfully ignores these facts and would let this enemy detonate a nuclear weapon in the our country BEFORE he would act. In my opinion, that would be too late.
569 posted on 01/08/2008 8:47:00 AM PST by Mr. Jazzy (The United States Marines: Finest and most feared fighting force in the history of mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: rb22982
Paul’s record on some of these conservative sites is distorted by he votes against them because they aren’t conservative enough.

I speculate that may often be the case. I am more than troubled, however, that he would not support almost any bill that Duncan Hunter proposed, sponsored, voted in favor of, but would side with, what appears to be, more liberals consistently, in areas (that Hunter didn't).

570 posted on 01/08/2008 8:47:32 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo; AuntB
AuntB, do you have that article link from the Houston Chronicle a few months ago that had Paul’s comments about immigration from the 90s in it?

Nicmarlo, his immigration stance he has now is pretty new. Up until a few years ago, he took the classic libertarian stance that the ‘US should NOT have a national immigration policy and should welcome anyone who wants to come here to work in.’ I’ve pinged AuntB for the source article & quote.

571 posted on 01/08/2008 8:48:41 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jazzy
Dr. Paul willfully ignores these facts and would let this enemy detonate a nuclear weapon in the our country BEFORE he would act.

I am not convinced that would be the case, at all.

572 posted on 01/08/2008 8:49:26 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
LOL!

Its fun to watch Paultards become militant in their anger against things militant.

After reading some of the Paultard comments on Youtube, I will always be specially prepared defensively, if I am ever around this crowd.

573 posted on 01/08/2008 8:50:16 AM PST by lormand (Ron Paul 08' - Cult of the Insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling; AuntB
his immigration stance he has now is pretty new. Up until a few years ago, he took the classic libertarian stance that the ‘US should NOT have a national immigration policy and should welcome anyone who wants to come here to work in.’

AuntB has already made me aware of these...I read dozens of them which she posted....it is thanks to her that I am aware of his past v. present stance on immigration.

574 posted on 01/08/2008 8:51:05 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

home


575 posted on 01/08/2008 8:51:06 AM PST by sauropod (Welcome to O'Malleyland. What's in your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Better turn on Rush Better turn on Rush .. Hurry!!!!


576 posted on 01/08/2008 8:51:09 AM PST by cva66snipe (Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 562 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

Why, special guest today?


577 posted on 01/08/2008 8:52:16 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 576 | View Replies]

To: lormand
After reading some of the Paultard comments on Youtube, I will always be specially prepared defensively, if I am ever around this crowd.


578 posted on 01/08/2008 8:52:24 AM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
No but I hear there is gonna be a gathering of commentators and their gonna use ORielly’s Body Language method to decode the secret video. Rush has the gift though so you never know.
579 posted on 01/08/2008 8:55:19 AM PST by cva66snipe (Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
http://grades.betterimmigration.com/testgrades.php3?District=TX&VIPID=787

He has a C in border control lifetime, B- recently. Otherwise he looks pretty good.

580 posted on 01/08/2008 8:55:40 AM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 701-706 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson