Well, he’d definitely eliminate any and all benefits immediately regardless. You are right though that Hunter is a far better presidential candidate than Paul, but Paul’s record on some of these conservative sites is distorted by he votes against them because they aren’t conservative enough.
I speculate that may often be the case. I am more than troubled, however, that he would not support almost any bill that Duncan Hunter proposed, sponsored, voted in favor of, but would side with, what appears to be, more liberals consistently, in areas (that Hunter didn't).