Posted on 01/07/2008 1:57:23 PM PST by mnehring
Ron Paul Lunatics
Sean returns to his hotel after crazy Ron Paul protesters rallied outside of a restaurant he was visiting in Manchester, New Hampshire.
Video Link: http://zshn.fimc.net//Article.asp?id=543226
--my comments--
According to Ron Paul forums, about 200 Paul supporters were part of this attack on Sean. They claim they were only throwing snowballs but the videos make it clear they were throwing bottles and other items other than snowballs.
Warning, foul language by Paul supporters.
“I don’t see what Sumter has to do with the post you are responding to. His point was that slavery would have eventually gone away with or without the civil war, just like it did in every other country.”
Thanks for keeping us on topic!
Darkmatter - what he said. :)
Brownshirt eh? So much for rational argument.
Nope. This person did not post to me.
You did.
Get it now?
Nice copout.
This thread is a fraud, yet it stays in Breaking News.
You defend it by your silence.
I didn’t try to hold you accountable for someone elses post - I wanted you to be accountable for your own post. You accused me of being rude - yet other posters who tell others their son should burn in hell for the candidate you support magically escape your notice.
Then you try to play Hurt Hillary in order to avoid answering direct questions.
Have fun.
Getting late, I'm forgetting to put words in my sentences now. Either that or I'm just do for a midnight snack.
And now you're being rude to Russert. Sheesh, does it ever end with you ill mannered Paul supporters? ;-D
So people aren't allowed to get excited over a presidential candidate? "Well, I'm so sorry Master, I go back on the GOP plantation and just vote for the RINO yes sirree!"
And they somehow think this is going to change people's minds about Paul.
Well, someone's obviously supporting Paul. The guy didn't haul in $4 and $6 million in separate days on his good looks alone.
But as he keeps his trap shut about the looneys and losers he attracts
Uh he has stated a million times he does not endorse their views.
Oh ok well as long as no rocks were thrown and it was only snowballs then I guess it wasnt “disgusting” and those Paulbots werent behaving like thugs and savages. (sarcasm off)
Ya know you would have more credibility if you claimed that those “Warrior” movie rejects were not representative of Paulistinians.
I would laugh if you said that, but it would be more believable than trying to pass what went on in that video off for civilized behavior.
“Get it now?”
Yes - your repeated dodges show that your opinions are not worthy of regard.
You are selectively blind to posts.
You have shown a total lack of intellectual integrity on this thread.
Say all you like - anyone honest who follows it back will see what you’re made of.
Not even Jon Cary can halp yuo. ;)
“I would laugh if you said that, but it would be more believable than trying to pass what went on in that video off for civilized behavior.”
I guess civilized behavior to you is shilling for RINO ROOTY the pro-abortionist.
Or Fox News deciding who can and can’t be in the NH debate - over the protests and withdrawal of the NH GOP as sponsors.
I would laugh if you said that, but it would be more believable than trying to pass what went on in that video off for civilized behavior.
No less civilized than Fox leaving him out of the debate despite the fact that he destroyed Rudy in Iowa and is polling at 10% in NH which is the same level of support of Rudy/Huckabee and ahead of Thompson. I wouldn't be there, but I can certainly understand these Paul supporters frustration.
“Uh he has stated a million times he does not endorse their views”
Apparently your fellow Paulbots on this thread do. They have been defending it for hours now.
What say you?
Indeed the character of his supports is an indicator of who he is. Why is it that all other candidate supporters dont act like thugs and savages the way these idiots do?
Where does anyone on this thread support Neo-Nazis and Marxist?
And that's what's so great about Paul. You can be yourself and he doesn't care, because he believes freedom is for everyone.
Why is it that all other candidate supporters dont act like thugs and savages the way these idiots do?
Probably because they don't have supporters to begin with? I don't know.
1 more addition to my last response to this post: You'd have a lot more credibility if you chastized the original poster for flat out lying in this 'breaking news' post. That is far more savage and thug like than one person throwing a snowball and being told by the other supporters to stop.
Night all, hopefully we can have more truthly and actual real ‘breaking news’ in the FR “Breaking News” column tomorrow. *fingers crossed that Thompson does well tomorrow*
“No less civilized than Fox leaving him out of the debate despite the fact that he destroyed Rudy in Iowa and is polling at 10% in NH which is the same level of support of Rudy/Huckabee and ahead of Thompson”
You may find Fox News decision to be unfair or biased, but to put in the same class as a mob of 20-40 people chasing down a guy they disagree with and throwing snowballs is asinine. Every word you say that defends that lunacy only makes you look more and more stupid.
Fox’s actions may or may not be fair, but those Paulbots were acting like a bunch of savages! There is no comparison.
The more you defend this behavior the less anyone will take you or your “Fuhrer” seriously. You would think with 10% of the vote you would try to bring in converts, not defend thuggish behavior, because your candidate was excluded from a debate.
Worked for Hitler.
Worked for Lenin.
Worked for Stalin.
Just get rid of the ones you no longer need as things progress.
Ooooh, you Paultards are soooo persuasive! I think I'll send my next paycheck to him now! </sarcasm>
You said anti-Paul people don't have lives. I say people WITH lives don't act like the A.N.S.W.E.R. nuts and the 9/11 truthers who seem to always be available on weekdays to annoy people who HAVE lives...and steady jobs.
Well, someone's obviously supporting Paul. The guy didn't haul in $4 and $6 million in separate days on his good looks alone.
Not enough people do or ever will. He'll go down in history as a minor-league Perot. And you know it.
Uh he has stated a million times he does not endorse their views.
Hyperbole aside, he has said he doesn't endorse their views, you are right. But he refuses to return their donations.
Paul rejected the idea that it is a principled stand to return donations from corrupt sources, telling Fox News' Neil Cavuto that doing so (as Hillary did in light of the exposure of Norman Hsu) is "pandering" and "politically correct." He said he won't send $500 back to white supremacist activist Don Black because, said Paul, he had already spent his money (weeeeak!), and if he gave it back to Black, he might do something bad with it.
In my opinion, he already did. He sent it to Paul.
Looked more like a wince.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.